Why Are the Same Movies Always on Cable TV?

Movies airing on TV have always been reliable options for networks, but a new study finds "new classics" are being replayed a surprising rate. What does that mean for the industry?

May 3, 2014 at 8:16AM

Does it seem like every time you turn on the TV you see the same movie playing?

It's not your imagination. A new study by IHS Technology is reporting that while the quantity of movie content on U.S. basic cable hit a three-year high last year, fewer unique movies were broadcast in 2013 than in the previous three years. (For a fun challenge, try to guess the top 10 most-played movies. Answers to follow.) In other words, the cable networks are sticking with reliable classics -- but for a few different reasons.


Source: Fox.

Second life
Showing movies as lead-ins for a network's original programming, or during weekends as part of a theme marathon, is nothing new. It's a time-tested model that works for both sides. They boost ratings for the network, and the lucrative deals behind them help studios offset a movie's production budget and achieve greater profitability.

The study from the El Segundo, Calif.-based company showed that Twenty-First Century Fox (NASDAQ:FOXA) led all other studios with nearly 90,000 hours of movie content being shown on cable last year. The report also speculates that total airtime is projected to be even higher this year and will represent an increase in both movie hours and share of airtime on TV. Movie consumption on basic cable is growing and logging more hours than ever before.

Cable leaders
It's not just Fox utilizing this trend. Warner Brothers, a subsidiary of Time Warner (NYSE:TWX), also was identified as a significant player in this market. Both have movie channels on basic cable, including Fox Movie Channel and Turner Classic Movies, but they also have content channels such as FX, TNT, and TBS that supplement their original programs and acquired series with films.

It's no surprise FX plays a big role in this practice -- the network seems to be the leader in locking up the TV rights to major motion pictures. Just look at 2013 when the channel picked up a slew of films, including blockbusters Man of Steel, Fast & Furious 6, World War Z, Despicable Me 2, and The Heat all before the summer was over. At the time of the deal FX CEO John Landgraf was quoted as saying he expected 21 movie premieres on the FX spinoff network FXX in 2014, which is a massive number.

Rules & restrictions
The study also goes into detail about the type of content that is more valuable. Titles from 2000 onwards are considered prime time, but that comes with a cost. The movies in that group are more expensive and are saddled with restrictions, including a lengthy wait time until a network can first air them.

Remember the standard life cycle for a movie is theaters, home entertainment (VOD/DVD/Blu-Ray/streaming), premium channels (HBO/Showtime/Starz), and then basic cable. Independent films often carry a different set of rules and the report found 78% of movies being aired in 2013 were from those studios.

Cable networks also tend to rely on classics from the '80s and '90s, as those films have looser restrictions and carry a built-in audience. In fact, six of the top 10 most shown moves on TV last year came from the 1990s including the most watched: 1993's Mrs. Doubtfire (which not coincidentally was distributed by Fox).

The full list, along with the number of times it ran on cable TV last year:

1. Mrs. Doubtfire (1993): 66
2. She's All That (1999): 59
3. Juno (2007): 53
4. Austin Powers in Goldmember (2002): 51
5. Ice Age (2002): 49
6. There's Something About Mary (1998): 47
7. Sleepless in Seattle (1993): 46
8. A Few Good Men (1992): 44
9. The Shawshank Redemption (1994): 44
10. Catwoman (2004): 44

Personally, I don't get Catwoman, but the rest of the names look right. Every time I see A Few Good Men or The Shawshank Redemption on TV, I get sucked in for at least 15 minutes.

With that in mind, this growing trend of intense focus on a few good films provides the rare win-win-win scenario: for networks (which capture viewers who can't flip away before they learn if Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan get together), for studios (which get funding to make new "new classics" ... or at least we can hope), and for viewers (who can take heart knowing Freddie Prinze, Jr. is never far away).

Your cable company is scared, but you can get rich
Even with weekly airings of Mrs. Doubtfire, you know cable's going away. But do you know how to profit? There's $2.2 trillion out there to be had. Currently, cable grabs a big piece of it. That won't last. And when cable falters, three companies are poised to benefit. Click here for their names. Hint: They're not Netflix, Google, and Apple. 


Brett Gold has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information