Congressional Inaction Could Lead to Additional Future Bailouts for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

The latest news is yet another roadblock preventing shareholders from seeing any profit.

May 4, 2014 at 12:31PM

To say the future for Fannie Mae (NASDAQOTCBB:FNMA) and Freddie Mac's (NASDAQOTCBB:FMCC) shareholders is uncertain would be quite an understatement! The latest news about the possibility of Fannie and Freddie needing another huge bailout if another downturn happened is just another "what if" shareholders have to deal with. We already know the U.S. Treasury takes all profits earned by both companies, and shareholders are suing in order to change this arrangement. In addition, there are a bunch of Senators who aim to dismantle both agencies and give all proceeds to the government, wiping out shareholders in the process. After the dramatic rise in their stock prices over the past year, is now a good time to cash in?

Fannie Mae


Fannie and Freddie would need how much more?
The FHFA issued a report stating that a "stress test" had been performed on Fannie and Freddie, using the same assumptions the Federal Reserve uses to decide how well the nation's biggest bank would weather a recession.

Many investors were surprised to learn the banks would need up to $190 billion in additional bailouts by the end of 2015 in a severe downturn. This is more than the $187.5 billion in taxpayer-funded assistance they received in 2008.

While it sounds like a lot  -- and it is -- there is a pretty valid reason why the companies don't have much capital in reserve. Under their agreement with the Treasury, the companies have to hand over all of their quarterly profits. This prevents Fannie and Freddie from building up their capital levels to withstand a sudden financial emergency. It also sounds like less of a "bailout" when you consider the nearly $203 billion in payments the government has already collected.

While I don't think the need for another big bailout is very likely, it does help make the government's case for keeping Fannie and Freddie 100% government-controlled. Basically, I think the government will say something to the effect of "Why shouldn't we keep all of the profits? We'll be on the hook for billions if things go sour."

Other drama...will shareholders ever see some profit?
There are two other issues facing Fannie and Freddie which shareholders don't want to see happen. First, under the current arrangement, 100% of profits go to the Treasury. Well, with the companies profitable and making some serious money now, shareholders who stuck with Fannie and Freddie feel they should share in the rewards. Makes sense, right?

A group of shareholders have filed a lawsuit in an attempt to force the Treasury to more equitably distribute the profits. Who knows if they will prevail, but the new stress test results certainly don't help their case.

Nor does it help stop the Senate's efforts to dismantle both companies. There is a bill in the Senate Banking Committee which would wind down Fannie and Freddie, giving all proceeds from asset sales to the government. The bill is delayed temporarily right now, but the fight continues. If the bill did pass in its current form, shareholders would likely be totally wiped out.

There seem to be a collection of forces working together to ensure the government keeps reaping the profits of the two housing finance giant. Will shareholders ever see any profit? Only time will tell.

If you sell, make sure to use your tax loopholes!
Recent tax increases have affected nearly every American taxpayer. But with the right planning, you can take steps to take control of your taxes and potentially even lower your tax bill. In our brand-new special report "The IRS Is Daring You to Make This Investment Now!," you'll learn about the simple strategy to take advantage of a little-known IRS rule. Don't miss out on advice that could help you cut taxes for decades to come. Click here to learn more.

Matthew Frankel has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

A Financial Plan on an Index Card

Keeping it simple.

Aug 7, 2015 at 11:26AM

Two years ago, University of Chicago professor Harold Pollack wrote his entire financial plan on an index card.

It blew up. People loved the idea. Financial advice is often intentionally complicated. Obscurity lets advisors charge higher fees. But the most important parts are painfully simple. Here's how Pollack put it:

The card came out of chat I had regarding what I view as the financial industry's basic dilemma: The best investment advice fits on an index card. A commenter asked for the actual index card. Although I was originally speaking in metaphor, I grabbed a pen and one of my daughter's note cards, scribbled this out in maybe three minutes, snapped a picture with my iPhone, and the rest was history.

More advisors and investors caught onto the idea and started writing their own financial plans on a single index card.

I love the exercise, because it makes you think about what's important and forces you to be succinct.

So, here's my index-card financial plan:


Everything else is details. 

Something big just happened

I don't know about you, but I always pay attention when one of the best growth investors in the world gives me a stock tip. Motley Fool co-founder David Gardner (whose growth-stock newsletter was rated #1 in the world by The Wall Street Journal)* and his brother, Motley Fool CEO Tom Gardner, just revealed two brand new stock recommendations moments ago. Together, they've tripled the stock market's return over 12+ years. And while timing isn't everything, the history of Tom and David's stock picks shows that it pays to get in early on their ideas.

Click here to be among the first people to hear about David and Tom's newest stock recommendations.

*"Look Who's on Top Now" appeared in The Wall Street Journal which references Hulbert's rankings of the best performing stock picking newsletters over a 5-year period from 2008-2013.