For High Pay and Lavish Bonuses, Check Out These U.S. Government Jobs


Source: Flickr / Images of Money.

There was a time when working in the public sector was considered a bid for job security, but not high wages. For that, the conventional wisdom said, you would pursue private sector employment.

That model seems to be changing. According to the Common Characteristics of the Government 2012 report, the average salary of a non-seasonal, full-time permanent federal employee was $78,467 as of September 2012. In December 2010, the average salary was $76,701.

That's not bad, considering that the average wage in the U.S. was $48,301 in 2011, according to government data. There's nothing wrong with the government paying good wages, either – as long as those salaries are in line with those of the private sector. After all, we are talking about taxpayer money, right?

Here are a couple of instances in which pay levels seem a little too high – and, in many cases, bonuses undeserved.

Internal Revenue Service
The recent brouhaha over bonuses bestowed upon IRS employees with histories of misconduct – including the non-payment of federal income taxes – has shed some light on the compensation practices of the federal government, and the situation looks rather dodgy.

In the report from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration released in March, it was revealed that between the last quarter of 2010 and 2012, more than 2,800 IRS employees with documented conduct problems were awarded over $2.8 million in bonus money, more than 27,000 hours off with pay, and 175 quality step increases. Of these employees, 1,100 had issues with federal tax compliance.

If that isn't annoying enough, the document acknowledges that these "performance" awards are in keeping with government regulations, which "do not provide guidance on providing awards to employees with conduct issues." This begs the question: For what type of performance are these employees being rewarded?

The IRS isn't skimpy with salaries, either. For example, an opening on USAjobs.gov gives the pay range for an Internal Revenue Agent as $69,497 to $107,434. Assumedly, bonuses are extra.

Federal regulators' pay tops that of bankers
A new study by Paul Kupiec of the American Enterprise Institute shows that banking watchdogs on the government payroll do pretty well when it comes to compensation – over 20% better than the average federal employee.

Kupiec took a look at salaries at agencies such as the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Consumer Financial Protection Board.

Compared to the average annual compensation of $69,266 received by a typical American bank employee in 2012, he found that 66% of OCC workers enjoyed a salary and bonus package totaling $100,000, 19% made over $180,000, and 10.5% earned more than $200,000. Similarly, 68% of CFPB and FDIC employees took home over $100,000, as well. Very few employees – less than 7% -- made less than $50,000 at any of these agencies in 2012.

These high compensation schedules come with a price. Not only are taxpayers shelling out for these healthy salaries, but Kupiec points out that bank customers pay, too, through increased banking fees. Shareholders also bear some of the burden, as well.

The federal government, like any employer, should compensate employees equitably for the good work they do. Perhaps these pay rates look incredibly high because so much of private sector pay has stagnated over the past few years. In my view, high wages are not the biggest issue here, since they may be necessary to procure excellent candidates who may feel that they could make more in the private sector.

The bonus system is much more worrying, since it seems unclear exactly why these employees are being given extra compensation. In private industry, workers are usually rewarded in this way for adding to the company's bottom line, which is not the case in government work. As the Treasury Inspector General has pointed out, there is no clear protocol for awarding bonuses. Shouldn't just doing their jobs well be enough remuneration? I think so. How about you?

Take advantage of this little-known tax "loophole"
Recent tax increases have affected nearly every American taxpayer. But with the right planning, you can take steps to take control of your taxes and potentially even lower your tax bill. In our brand-new special report "The IRS Is Daring You to Make This Investment Now!," you'll learn about the simple strategy to take advantage of a little-known IRS rule. Don't miss out on advice that could help you cut taxes for decades to come. Click here to learn more.


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (0)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On May 05, 2014, at 9:39 PM, kimball11 wrote:

    It's no surprise that the AVERAGE of government salaries are higher than the private sector, similarly to any other large professional organization like Google, IBM, Motley Fool etc. The government does not have many or any minimum wage jobs. In fact it has dropped most of its clerks. It does have a lot of lawyers, scientists, analysts, engineers, etc. Do you really want minimum wage workers auditing your taxes, inspecting your food, evaluating your drugs, approving nuclear power plants, or guiding your airliner? As for bonuses - do you really believe that no one in the private sector gets them, too? How about at the Motley Fool?

  • Report this Comment On May 06, 2014, at 9:40 AM, cocodelo wrote:

    Many of the contractors that work within the government, such as housekeeping, cafeteria, and other traditionally low paying jobs are included in the private sector in this analysis - removed from the government, which makes government pay appear higher on average.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2933304, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/24/2014 9:00:12 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement