Prospect Capital Corporation Earnings Take an Interesting Turn

The SEC wants Prospect Capital to restate its earnings to consolidate the financials of its many wholly-owned operating companies.

May 7, 2014 at 1:21PM

Prospect Capital (NASDAQ:PSEC) reported earnings yesterday, but all eyes are on a few particular items in the company's recent filings.

The quarterly report reveals that the SEC may require Prospect Capital to restate its historical financials to account for its operating companies.

The specifics
Prospect Capital is chock-full of operating companies -- companies in which it owns a majority stake. Normally, the financial results of majority-owned, or "control" companies would have to be included in the financials of the public company.

For example, Prospect Capital owns First Tower, one of its biggest operating companies. Because it holds 100% ownership of a holding company that owns 80.1% of the operating company, the financials for First Tower and other majority-owned companies, the SEC argues, should be included in the financials at Prospect Capital.

Right now, Prospect Capital does not consolidate the results from First Tower in its own financials. Instead, First Tower maintains its own balance sheet. What insight we have into a company like First Tower is limited to the disclosures in the company's SEC filings. The recent quarterly report shows third-party debt, total assets at First Tower, and finance receivables (First Tower loans to customers), but not fully fledged financials.

Does it matter?
Yes, for two reasons.

First, Prospect Capital management noted on the conference call that it had previously recorded more interest and fee income from its operating companies than the operating companies earned. They insist that their focus remains on cash flow, and thus, so long as cash flow covers cash paid back to Prospect by their operating companies, there shouldn't be a problem.

If consolidated, however, Prospect Capital would only be able to report a portfolio company's reported net income in any given quarter. Since the companies' net income has been historically lower than the amount of interest and dividends paid to Prospect Capital, restated earnings would be lower.

Secondly, there's the issue of leverage. BDCs are limited to 1:1 leverage. Should the financials of its operating companies be consolidated into Prospect Capital's results, Prospect Capital will have significantly higher debt levels than reported today. In First Tower's case, there is roughly $272 million of additional, third-party debt that would have to be reported on the Prospect Capital balance sheet, which could affect its required 1:1 leverage limit imposed on BDCs.

The dizzying world of BDC accounting
The complexities of the current accounting methodologies make it difficult to understand the true profitability of Prospect Capital's operating companies.

This quarter, Nationwide Acceptance and Credit Central, two of Prospect Capital's operating companies, paid Prospect Capital dividends of $5 million and $2 million respectively. However, this same quarter, Prospect Capital invested a combined $6.5 million in the two companies.

The accounting as it exists today makes this a bit of a shell game to those looking in from the outside. Prospect loaned its portfolio companies $5.525 million, added $975,000 in equity, then paid itself dividends of $7 million.

Said another way, $6.5 million left Prospect Capital to go to Nationwide Acceptance and Credit Central. Then, $7 million came back to Prospect Capital (on the income statement) as a dividend. Of course, there are adjustments to the equity valuations likely as a result of the dividends paid, but the impact is murky at best.

Equity is valued with "unobservable inputs," and any adjustment to expected future business volumes, a change in unknown discount rates, or movement in default rates on Nationwide Acceptance and Credit Central's loan book, etc. could have just as much effect on the equity line as a dividend. 

Prospect Capital is appealing the SEC's request to consolidate its financials, so for now, it's just one giant waiting game.

Are these dividend stocks better than BDCs?
Recent tax increases have affected nearly every American taxpayer. But with the right planning, you can take steps to take control of your taxes and potentially even lower your tax bill. In our brand-new special report "The IRS Is Daring You to Make This Investment Now!," you'll learn about the simple strategy to take advantage of a little-known IRS rule. Don't miss out on advice that could help you cut taxes for decades to come. Click here to learn more.

Jordan Wathen has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information