Disney Confirms 3 ‘Star Wars’ Spin-Off Films on the Way

Disney just confirmed that three new "Star Wars" spin-off films have been confirmed. Is this a clever strategy for expanding the Star Wars Universe, or is Disney getting greedy?

May 9, 2014 at 8:25AM

Disney (NYSE:DIS) CEO Bob Iger recently confirmed that "at least three" new Star Wars spin-off films were in the works, running parallel to its three upcoming main films, Episodes VII, VIII, and IX. Disney has stated in the past that the first two spin-off films (also referred to as "origin films" by Disney CFO Jay Rasulo) were tentatively scheduled for 2016 and 2018, to pick up the slack between the upcoming films in the new trilogy. Episode VII is expected to hit theaters in December 2015.

The first two spin-off films will reportedly star fan favorites Han Solo and Boba Fett, while fans have speculated that other future films might star Yoda or Darth Maul. What's clear is that Disney is planning on expanding its Star Wars Universe -- which it acquired by buying Lucasfilm for $4 billion in October 2012 -- the same way it expanded the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

Star Wars Anthology

Source: Lucasfilm.

The economics of Star Wars
Many fans consider George Lucas more of a visionary than the ideal writer and director for the franchise. Lucas -- who wrote and directed Episodes I,II,III, and IV -- is frequently criticized for his writing style and over-dependence on CGI special effects in the later installments.

But whatever your personal opinion of George Lucas, his ultimate plan for Star Wars was brilliant. He first let viewers see the end (Episodes IV to VI), then when those kids grew up, he revealed the beginning (Episodes I to III). Now, as the kids who grew up watching Episodes I through III have kids of their own, Lucasfilm is releasing Episodes VII to IX -- completing a four-decade long domination of three generations of viewers.

By 2010, that master plan had generated $4.55 billion in box office receipts, $9 billion in action figures and toys, and $1.6 billion in video games from LucasArts. Disney plans to replicate that business model, double its efforts with spin-off films, and place it beside Marvel as its second universe of long-term revenue growth.

A clean slate
Disney made it clear that its new trilogy will not take into account events from the Expanded Universe (EU) of Star Wars -- which includes all the comic books, novels, games, and spin-offs that have accumulated over the past few decades.

This erases notable events such as Luke's marriage to Mara Jade (although Mara will possibly appear in Episode VII), her subsequent death at the hands of Han and Leia's son Jacen Solo, and the death of Chewbacca. Disney rebranded the entire EU as "Legends," simply meaning that those events never actually happened.


Mara Jade, one of the most well-known characters introduced in the EU. Source: Comicvine.com

A lot of longtime fans were upset about the reset, but it makes sense -- the average moviegoer would have been confused if the new trilogy included all of the events that occurred in the EU.

The business of origin films
The big problem is that "spin-off" and "origin films" have a lot of trouble measuring up to the original films. Two recent examples are Fox's (NASDAQ:FOX) Elektra (2005) and X-Men Origins: Wolverine (2009).


Production cost

Global box office

Rotten Tomatoes

Elektra (2005)

$43 million

$57 million


X-Men Origins: Wolverine (2009)

$150 million

$373 million


Source: Box Office Mojo, Rotten Tomatoes.

Although neither film completely bombed, both were poorly received by critics. Elektra was spun off from Daredevil (2003), but suffered because it just highlighted the fact that Jennifer Garner's Elektra wasn't actually interesting enough to carry a film without Daredevil. X-Men Origins: Wolverine made a different mistake, by altering Sabretooth's origin to the point that it didn't flow into his previous depiction in X-Men (2000).

The problems Fox experienced with Elektra and X-Men Origins: Wolverine highlight the mistakes that Disney could make with Boba Fett and Han Solo spin-off films.

Although Boba Fett only played a minor role in the original trilogy, his popularity prompted George Lucas to turn Boba and his "father," Jango, into central characters in Episode II: Attack of the Clones -- in which Jango was revealed to be the genetic template for the Clone Army. However, a Boba Fett solo film could suffer the same fate as Elektra -- he's just not interesting enough to carry an entire film.

Boba Fett

Is Boba Fett an overrated character? Source: Starwars.com

Meanwhile, a Han Solo spin-off, possibly starring younger versions of Han, Lando, and Chewbacca, is an interesting concept. However, the actor portraying a younger Han Solo would face the daunting task of filling Harrison Ford's shoes. However, I believe that a Han Solo origin film might succeed if Disney hands the film over to The Avengers director Joss Whedon, who created the similarly themed, cult favorite sci-fi series Firefly.

Do or do not, there is no try...
In conclusion, new spin-off films could quickly turn Star Wars into a second pillar of growth for Disney alongside Marvel. Since Disney started booking full profits from its Marvel films (starting from The Avengers), its Marvel films have grossed more than $4 billion over the course of four films in two years.

Disney's Studio Entertainment revenue has remained fairly unchanged since it acquired Marvel in 2009. The segment generated $5.98 billion in revenue in 2013, compared to $6.14 billion in 2009. Yet during that period, Disney gradually shifted film production to Marvel, Pixar, and Lucasfilm -- letting those popular studios do the heavy lifting to avoid accidentally releasing in-house turkeys like Mars Needs Moms, John Carter, and The Lone Ranger.

However, Disney needs to plan its steps for Star Wars carefully, since missteps could alienate both longtime fans and new audiences. Let's just hope that Disney heeds Yoda's advice to avoid the "quick and easy path" when it comes to the future of Star Wars.

Use the Force, fellow investor...
The one sure way to get wealthy is to invest in a groundbreaking company that goes on to dominate a multibillion-dollar industry. Our analysts have found multi-bagger stocks time and again. And now they think they've done it again with three stock picks that they believe could generate the same type of phenomenal returns. They've revealed these picks in a new free report that you can download instantly by clicking here now.


Leo Sun owns shares of Walt Disney. The Motley Fool recommends Walt Disney. The Motley Fool owns shares of Walt Disney. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information