Q1 Revenue Pops 37%: Why AMC Networks Shares Took a Hit Anyway

Rising costs hit earnings and shares fall to a new 52-week low before recovering slightly. Here's what you need to know.

May 9, 2014 at 9:54AM

AMC Networks (NASDAQ:AMCX) reported earnings early on Thursday, beating expectations on revenue but widely missing the mark on earnings per share. Shares got hammered when the market opened, falling more than 12% in early trading before settling in for a 8% loss at the close. Today we'll quickly address the analyst estimates before digging deeper into the first-quarter earnings for the cable network family.


The Walking Dead is keeping AMC Networks very much alive. Photo credit: Frank Ockenfels 3/AMC

Analyst summary
Though quarterly analyst estimates don't mean much for the long-term health of the stock, they can explain short-term movements, as they did Thursday. Here's a look at what analysts were expecting, and what AMC Networks actually delivered for the first quarter of 2014:








$507.5 million

$525 million

Source: Yahoo! Finance and company release

The network easily surpassed revenue estimates but came up quite short on earnings per share, which grew from $0.85 a year ago to $0.99. A 31% rise in expenses totaling $64 million ate up much of the 37% rise in revenue.

Now that the analysts are out of the way, let's dig into the actual results.

Revenue and costs both climb
The company has slightly restructured its business segments after the Chellomedia acquisition, grouping revenue from AMC Canada, Sundance Canada, and AMC Networks' Broadcasting & Technology into "National Networks," while everything else falls under "International and Other." The former segment accounts for the bulk of the company's revenues right now.

The big first-quarter boost came as advertising revenues for the company's national networks segment climbed 26.8%, topping out at $208 million. Chellomedia drove growth in the international segment, where revenues climbed 634% year over year. There is some overlap between the two segments, and this quarter that amounted to roughly $704 million that was backed out from the final revenue calculation.

Despite the 37% increase in total revenue, adjusted operating cash flow only increased 11%. Management attributed this to two factors: higher programming and marketing expenses in the national networks segment, and Chellomedia expenses.

Cause for concern?
To be sure, the network's key numbers -- advertising revenue, distribution revenue, operating income -- are all moving in the right direction; it's just that operating costs are also moving in that direction, and it's giving investors pause.

Analysts on the network's earnings call were particularly concerned with the adjusted operating cash flow margin, which was lower this year than the first quarter of 2013. Here's a look at the numbers:


Q1 2013

Q1 2014

Net Revenue






Margin %



Source: Company press release

What we see here is that the quality of programming has been a boon for advertising revenue and pushed net revenue straight up, but adjusted operating cash flow lags way behind on a relative basis, so far behind that as a percentage of net revenue it's actually lower than it was last year. What does management have to say for itself? We have this excerpt from the earnings call:

This is a multi-year evolution for each of the channels. ... AMC being more mature ... has a very healthy margin. As we're investing in WE, IFC and Sundance, it obviously is going to take several years to recapture and capture the investments that [are] related to the shows that we're investing in. So to the extent you're seeing margin pressure in the near term and historically in the near term, it has a result of us significantly investing in the shows on those three channels.

Management declined to give guidance on costs going forward, other than we can expect to see something similar next quarter.

The power of original programming
All of the costs the network is incurring are because AMC is investing heavily in its original programming so that it can maintain the success of programs like The Walking Dead, which is the highest rated show on television in the coveted 18 to 49 demographic. It is also intent that its new content be wholly owned, which will increase revenue in the long term. How does this work exactly? Here's some more color from management:

First quarter results reflected a strong double-digit year-over-year increase in non-affiliate revenues due to increases in revenue related to scripted original programs most notably the international and home-video distribution of The Walking Dead, as well as the SVOD [Subscription Video On Demand] availability of Rectify and the international distribution of The Red Road.

When you own your own content, you reap rewards via multiple channels, including digital viewership and international licensing. AMC's vision on this is supported by the Chellomedia acquisition, which gives the network its own international distribution channel.

Bottom line
Unlike many tech stocks you can find on the market these days, AMC Networks is actually profitable as it invests in the long-term health of its business. If you believe in this long-term vision, that is that it will develop and own its original programming, then there is a lot to like about the path the company is taking, especially now that it is expanding its footprint to include comedies. Television development is very expensive, and there may be a short-term squeeze on earnings as costs rise, but the network's ability to increase advertising revenues across channels and grow internationally may be a real opportunity for investors in it for the long run.

Top dividend stocks for the next decade
The smartest investors know that dividend stocks simply crush their non-dividend paying counterparts over the long term. That's beyond dispute. They also know that a well-constructed dividend portfolio creates wealth steadily, while still allowing you to sleep like a baby. Knowing how valuable such a portfolio might be, our top analysts put together a report on a group of high-yielding stocks that should be in any income investor's portfolio. To see our free report on these stocks, just click here now.

Aimee Duffy has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends AMC Networks. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information

Compare Brokers