NVIDIA's Results Look Good, So Why Did Shares Drop?

NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA  ) , a leading developer of GPU-centric solutions that span a broad range of applications from mobile to the data center, reported solid earnings at its most recent quarterly release. Let's dig into the results and, more importantly, try to get a sense of why, in light of a solid report, shares took a breather.

The numbers look good
For the most recent quarter, revenue came in at $1.103 billion, up a solid 16% year over year, and driven by a strong core GPU business as well as renewed growth in the Tegra business (which was up 35% year over year). While operating expenses grew slightly year over year, the revenue/gross margin dollar growth was more than enough to offset it, leading to a 75% increase in net income and -- thanks to those aggressive buybacks -- about an 85% increase in earnings per share.

As far as the forward guide goes, NVIDIA is calling for $1.1 billion on the top line (which was ahead of sell-side consensus) next quarter (roughly flat quarter-over-quarter), and gross margins to decline slightly to between 53.7% and 54%. The gross margin hit is largely due to the projected increase in Tegra sales for mobile and automotive, which obviously carry lower gross margins than gaming GPUs. Operating expenses are expected to be up to $457 million, a slight increase from $453 million in the prior quarter.

Why is the stock down?
The obvious question at this point, then, is if the numbers look good, why is the stock down? Well, consider for a moment that the stock is already up about 30% over the last year, and a lot of the "fears" that kept the stock in bargain-bin territory have now largely proven false (and the stock price reflects that).

Sell-side expectations are calling for $0.85/share in earnings for the current fiscal year (ending in Jan. 2015) and $0.95/share for the following year. At about $18/share, and with about $5.39/share in net cash, the company is trading at roughly 14.9 times this year's estimates and about 13.27 times next year's estimates. This is by no means an expensive stock, and the downside from current levels is likely limited, but after such a good run, and following "good" but not "blowout" results in a market that seems to punish anything but excellence, a roughly 3% drop is expected and nothing to worry about long term.

Where does it go from here?
At this point, NVIDIA has a lot of growth drivers going for it: GeForce for gaming PCs should continue to be robust, Tegra is getting its bearings, and professional/workstation/HPC continues to be quite a nice and healthy growth segment for the company.

There will always be those who worry that Intel (NASDAQ: INTC  ) will make NVIDIA's GPU business irrelevant with beefier integrated graphics, but this argument hasn't worked in the past, and will likely continue to fail in the future as games continue to become more and more demanding, soaking up every last GPU cycle possible. NVIDIA's core GPU business is safe, and the question here is only one of future potential growth drivers rather than one of long-term viability.

Foolish takeaway
While NVIDIA is certainly not the no-brainer bargain it was in the $12 range, it is still an excellent company with valuable IP, a strong core business, and an aggressive management team unafraid of taking bold risks to try to drive future growth. The shares may be due for a breather after such a nice run over the last year or so (meaning you might want to wait for a pullback before initiating a new position or adding to a current one), but long term -- as long as the company executes on its vision -- shareholders should be nicely rewarded. 

The biggest thing to come out of Silicon Valley in years
If you thought the iPod, the iPhone, and the iPad were amazing, just wait until you see this. One hundred of Apple's top engineers are busy building one in a secret lab. And an ABI Research report predicts 485 million of them could be sold over the next decade. But you can invest in it right now... for just a fraction of the price of AAPL stock. Click here to get the full story in this eye-opening new report.


Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (5)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On May 11, 2014, at 10:11 AM, akaRAV55 wrote:

    @Ashraf

    Do you really want to know why Intel stock dropped?

    Hmmm... how about probably because Intel is losing $3.1 billion per year trying to sell silicon in the tablet and mobile space. Intel can't compete in that space and has to sell silicon at a loss to compete with AMD.

    "In 2013, Intel's mobile chip division lost a hefty $3.15 billion, after posting an operating loss of $1.78 billion in 2012. In the first quarter of 2014 alone, the Mobile and Communications Group saw a $929 million operating loss on a meager $156 million in revenue, according to new financial results issued today by the company."

    http://www.theverge.com/2014/4/15/5618126/intel-is-losing-bi... the really BIG question is Ashraf why desn't this piss you off as an Intel stockholder?

    Why aren't you frothing at the mouth in a perpetual rant about Intel wasting money in the Mobile space?

    Why aren't you being rational for once in you patheltic writing career?

    Intel is eating it's young as well as it's shareholders money by selling silicon at a loss just to try and keep AMD out of that space. Intel has to continue to evolve silicon in that space and that means more outrageous losses.

    So the storey is really Intel talks a great game but it can not deliver.

    This is not a rational act.

    Intel can not grow when the entire Mobile and Communications Group is an absolute and utterly devastating failure.

  • Report this Comment On May 11, 2014, at 11:41 AM, TMFAeassa wrote:

    @ akaRAV55

    This is an article about NVIDIA.

  • Report this Comment On May 11, 2014, at 12:00 PM, CHADBOGA wrote:

    akaRAV55,

    You are making less sense than usual, and you are normally quite illogical.

    If Intel breaks into mobile in a big way with x86, it opens the door for AMD to follow them there.

    Clearly AMD's mobile efforts won't amount to anything without Intel laying the ground work first.

    The situation before us now is like the mid 90's when Intel was trying to become a major player in the Server Market.

    And we will see the same result in Mobile, as we saw in the Server Market.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2951218, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/27/2014 6:54:49 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement