Should IBM's POWER 8 Worry Intel?

When it comes to server processors, Intel (NASDAQ: INTC  ) is by far the most financially successful. While Intel is well known for having the highest-performing microprocessors in the industry, this isn't strictly true. Indeed, if there is one company out there that builds bigger, hotter, and more powerful processors than Intel does for ultra-high end Unix servers, it's IBM (NYSE: IBM  ) with its POWER line of microprocessors. With IBM's recent launch of its POWER 8 processors, should Intel be worried?

The power of POWER 8
IBM's POWER 8 is truly a technical tour de force:

Source: IBM.

The POWER 8 CPU core is extremely wide, clocks quite high, and offers what seems to be unmatched single-threaded performance. In fact, if we look at performance results of a system packing four of the six core variants of the POWER 8 clocked at 3.52 GHz, and compare it ith a system packing four of Intel's most recently launched Xeon E7-4890 v2 (codenamed Ivy Bridge-EX), IBM's solution compares quite favorably on a per-core basis.

The four-socket Xeon E7-4890 (which packs 60 Ivy Bridge CPU cores clocked at 2.8 GHz) scores 138,900 SAPS (higher is better) while the four-socket POWER 8 (which packs 24 CPU cores clocked at 3.52 GHz) scores 115,870 SAPS. The Intel system offers greater performance, but on a per-core basis the IBM is much more powerful. Also, from a more geeky technical perspective, the IBM CPU is much wider, the chip has significantly more cache, and it offers much higher memory bandwidth than the Intel chip.

Great, IBM's POWER 8 is a beast. So what?
While the performance of the IBM POWER 8 is not at all in question (this is a magnificent piece of engineering), this has never actually been a problem for IBM's POWER line of processors. The POWER 7 was a much beefier and powerful processor relative to its Intel Xeon competition, yet Intel has continued to gain share in the overall server processor market. So what are the important questions investors need to ask about POWER 8?

Intel's success has never just been due to performance leadership; a 6-core POWER 8 about matches a 15-core Intel Xeon, and the 12-core variant of the POWER 8 would utterly embarrass it in performance. The problem for IBM is that the equation for data-center dominance isn't simply about performance, but is instead about performance per watt per dollar. While it's too soon to get a read on the performance per watt of the IBM POWER 8 (although it's likely that this kind of performance doesn't come cheaply), the real problem that is likely to plague it is the cost.

IBM doesn't have Intel's scale
The POWER 8 is built on IBM's custom 22-nanometer SOI process (finely tuned for high-performance CPUs) using 15 metal layers and weighing in at a hefty 650-square-millimeter die size. Further, note that the volumes of this processor are likely extremely low and, in case you haven't been following IBM's financial statements, the sales of systems using these processors continue to plummet. On top of that, given that this is quite a large, exotic design, yields may still be difficult (but for what machines based on this chip sell for, IBM can afford it).

IBM's Systems & Technology group continues to bleed out. Source: IBM. 

On the other hand, Intel's Xeon E7 (Ivy Bridge-EX) is a 4.31 billion-transistor machine weighing in at 541 square millimeters built on a quite mature 22-nanometer FinFET process in factories that have to date pumped out hundreds of millions of 22-nanometer FinFET processors. While the volumes on this part are low, and while yields on this chip are almost assuredly trickier than a 1.4 billion-transistor Haswell notebook CPU, they are probably better than the IBM POWER 8's at this stage of the game.

In short, even if the performance per watt is better than or equal to Intel's, Intel is likely to be able to offer its product much more cheaply as a result of the massive design leverage, as well as the manufacturing leverage it gets from its PC chip and other segments of its server business.

Foolish bottom line
A big round of applause for IBM's technical teams in executing one of the most interesting and exotic processors on the planet today. While IBM appears to hope for a better future for POWER by opening up the architecture and designs for third-party licensing via its OpenPOWER initiative, the markets that IBM's niche high-end servers that it builds POWER for are still very difficult and not getting any easier.

The key things to watch for:

  • Licensing uptake with OpenPOWER.
  • IBM POWER server sales as POWER 8 systems ramp.

If neither of these points to renewed signs of life for POWER, then the fate of these technically beautiful POWER processors may be sealed and Intel will have nothing to worry about. If, on the other hand, OpenPOWER gets POWER 8 into more markets, then Intel may indeed have something to worry about. 

The biggest thing to come out of Silicon Valley in years
If you thought the iPod, the iPhone, and the iPad were amazing, just wait until you see this. One hundred of Apple's top engineers are busy building one in a secret lab. And an ABI Research report predicts 485 million of them could be sold over the next decade. But you can invest in it right now, for just a fraction of the price of Apple stock. Click here to get the full story in this eye-opening new report.

Read/Post Comments (5) | Recommend This Article (3)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On May 11, 2014, at 10:59 PM, GarySchuster wrote:


    Thanks for this review. I had read articles suggesting that IBM was likely to gain market share with their Power 8 processor and wondered whether this was truly likely to occur? Your article does a good job of explaining the Power 8 and Xeon chips along with projected manufacturing costs and power consumption considerations. As always, the market will decide if the Power 8 chip is a winner. But, after reading your article, I think chances are good that the Xeon chips will continue to dominate--Thanks Again

  • Report this Comment On May 12, 2014, at 10:04 AM, jus4fun wrote:

    Very nice article. However, its tasted like Sauerkraut. The angle were mixed ..technical detail to stock marked values. Stock market analysis sounds right, but on the technical detail, really need really attend their technical seminar or read up. I attend one earlier this year with same mindset as yours and was pleasantly blown away.. I think tried it out myself and comparing Power 7 with Intel and they were right. Xeon chip...(pick any you like) will not come close to the Power 7 processor. Also..all those per core, sixe weight, saps and what not.. does not really matter. As any end-user, I would look at what thruput I get and in what time and in what time..and at what effective cost ..not just equipment cost but overall.

    My buddy can chew up 10 hotdogs in a minute,but take about 2 minutes to swallow it.. Whereas my other buddy can chew up only 7 but also gulp it down in 1 minute.

    The current industry is changing in a way things are looked upon. Speed is not the only factor....the whole end to end timing and volume is the key things. Unless Intel does something in that line, I see it getting tough competition.

    But from cost of purchase, it definitely has an edge. And also ease of use. I dont like they maintained their simplicity and affordability. If IBM plays their cards right..they could win, but I hear the fat management is the problem. Trimming is happening at work force level and management is just getting fatter.

    Again.. a good article, wish facts were more upto date and separated out well.

    I would gladly take your finance outlooks. :)

    Good day.

  • Report this Comment On May 12, 2014, at 10:14 AM, tempest669 wrote:


    Could you please tell all of the story? I mean you, as a former IT person, should know better. First, x86 is only 1/3 of total server market with Power (and it's RISC brethren) dominating the overall server market. Second, it's pretty clear POWER is targeting big data, where cost per watt is not the primary condition to meet. If you have big, big data and servers, yes saving $$ on energy is nice, but that is secondary. Reliability is primary regardless of what it costs to feed.

    So POWER's new chips are significantly larger than the new Xeon's. Why would that be? Maybe thermal dissipation, and long-life in a server that will run nonstop and likely be serviced by IBM for years. In markets INTC has been unable to penetrate effectively.

    Everyone reading your work knows you're a fan of INTC. Fine. But there is a lot more going on in this article than most readers are aware of that you could have touched on.

  • Report this Comment On May 12, 2014, at 1:59 PM, TMFAeassa wrote:

    @ tempest669

    I would be more than happy to explore any aspect that you would like in a future article.

    Perhaps a look at the RAS features of POWER 8 versus Xeon E7 v2?

    Let me know, and I'll be happy to explore anything you'd like!


  • Report this Comment On June 03, 2014, at 9:08 AM, PowerInsider wrote:

    Good Article, but the real issue with Power 8 is the lack of a vibrant ecosystem. Power 7 was at war with Oracle(Exadata) SAP(Hana), and Cisco Systems(VCS). Co-selling with Oracle and SAP declined sharply. It began in 2012 and from that time period to January 1, 2014 hardware revenues overall have declined by about 4 Billion. Intel on the other hand has made the right investments, in the right companies to ensure dominance in a scale out - SHARDED WORLD! It's the APPS and where they run will decide who wins. The speed of the processor will not compel startups, Mobile developers, and the Millennial's to embrace Power 8.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2952269, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/1/2015 4:24:42 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Ashraf Eassa

Ashraf Eassa is a technology specialist with The Motley Fool. He writes mostly about technology stocks, but is especially interested in anything related to chips -- the semiconductor kind, that is. Follow him on Twitter:

Today's Market

updated 7 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 16,528.03 -114.98 -0.69%
S&P 500 1,972.18 -16.69 -0.84%
NASD 4,776.51 -51.82 -1.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

8/31/2015 4:02 PM
IBM $147.89 Down -0.09 -0.06%
International Busi… CAPS Rating: ****
INTC $28.54 Up +0.12 +0.42%
Intel CAPS Rating: ****