Does it Make Sense for Apple to Buy Beats?

For Apple  (NASDAQ: AAPL  ) the Dr. may soon be in the house.

Multiple news outlets have reported that Apple is in talks to acquire headphone maker and music-streaming service Beats Electronics for $3.2 billion. The acquisition would be the biggest ever for the company that makes the iPhone, iPads, and Mac computers. If the deal goes through Apple would not only be purchasing Beats' popular line of high-end (and high-priced) headphones, it would also be buying the Beats Music service that started earlier this year. Unlike Apple's ad-supported iTunes Radio service (which many see as the company's answer to Pandora  (NYSE: P  ) ), Beats Music uses a subscription model charging users $10 a month for unlimited access to songs in the service's catalog through a smartphone, tablet, or Web browser.

Beats was founded by music-industry executive Jimmy Iovine and legendary hip-hop artist/producer Dr. Dre. Beats has sort of gone down this road once before as HTC once held a 50% share of the company, but has since been bought out of its investment, according to GeekWire. 

The Beats line of headphones, which appeals to both audiophiles and the style-conscious, would give Apple another high-end line to market through its online and physical retail channels. The subscription-based music service would give the company a hedge against falling sales in its iTunes music store and a way to prepare for a possible future where people stop owning music.

The day of the download may be past

Downloads have been a tremendous source of revenue and continued growth for digital music sales, but signs point to the possibility that sales for downloads have peaked while streaming and subscription-based services have tremendous room for growth.

Global digital music revenues reached an all-time high of $5.9 billion in 2013 as revenues from streaming services, both ad-supported (+17.6%) and subscription-based (+51.3%), saw strong growth that outweighed a slight decline in download sales (-2.1%), according to IFPI, a music business trade association. The chart below shows that over the past five years downloads are up by more than 50% but the 2013 dip suggests the rise of streaming services will eventually supplant the need for most people to actually own music. 

The iTunes Store generated $9.3 billion in net sales during 2013, a 24% increase from 2012. Growth in the iTunes Store, "reflects continued growth in the installed base of iOS devices, expanded offerings of iOS apps and related in-App purchases, and expanded offerings of iTunes digital content," according to the company's annual report. Apple does not break out how much of that revenue comes from music sales, but the number is likely huge and the company may see the writing on the wall for downloads.

"They are buying into the future and the future is going to be streaming and subscription," Jon Irwin, the former president of rival music service Rhapsody, told Bloomberg. "Revenue from streaming and subscription is growing. Files and downloads are shrinking. Everyone has to engage in streaming and subscription." 

Subscription services were something former Apple CEO Steve Jobs was long resistant to pursue, but current CEO Tim Cook seems more than open to the idea. Buying Beats gives Apple a ready-made platform that should let it compete with Spotify, the current subscription leader.

The devices are good too

Apple makes high-end products that it charges a premium for. It also makes stylish computers and devices that are almost as much fashion accessory as they are tech items. The Beats headphones -- which retail for between $170 and $450 -- were designed with exactly the same logic. In many ways the Beats line feels like an Apple product already and Apple already sells the line in its online and retail stores.

Adding Beats to the Apple family of products should be a natural fit and it opens up opportunities for the company. Imagine Beats-branded headphones paired with a special edition iPhone or Beats-designed earbuds. This is new territory for Apple, which usually buys smaller companies, shuts down their products, and integrates some technology into existing (or new) Apple devices. With Beats, Apple will be buying a successful product that it should be able to market alongside its own offerings while expanding sales through its stores.

This deal just makes sense

But the purchase isn't just about headphones and a music service. Apple is also buying some street cred. Apple has a reputation as a pretty hip company but adding the cache that comes with being in business with Iovine and Dr. Dre makes Apple cooler. Apple is geek hip now (and geeks are in at the moment), but Iovine brings music exec hip, and Dre is on the hip hop Mount Rushmore and he has crossed over to a mainstream audience while retaining his rap credibility.

Apple (or any company) faces an uphill battle competing for paying subscribers with a music service, but it needs to be in that space. Apple should be able to exponentially increase sales of Beats products by optimizing and integrating the line for its devices. It should also be able to increase sales of the already-successful headphones by featuring them more prominently in its stores. Overall, this acquisition -- should it occur -- makes sense for Apple and it's hard to see a downside.

The biggest thing to come out of Silicon Valley in years
If you thought the iPod, the iPhone, and the iPad were amazing, just wait until you see this. One hundred of Apple's top engineers are busy building one in a secret lab. And an ABI Research report predicts 485 million of them could be sold over the next decade. But you can invest in it right now... for just a fraction of the price of AAPL stock. Click here to get the full story in this eye-opening new report.


Read/Post Comments (4) | Recommend This Article (8)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On May 12, 2014, at 7:32 AM, jdmeck wrote:

    Where is the research? Beats is NOT high end, only high priced. Audiophiles hate them, and the subscription service is a barely ran. I don't see this as good for Apple.

  • Report this Comment On May 12, 2014, at 8:05 AM, Exanut wrote:

    Nice article except that the headphones are no where near "audiophile" quality. They distort the sound significantly, having an exaggerated base response and a somewhat harsh high end. Sennheiser makes some audiophile quality headsets in a similar price range. Please provide a reference for your claim of "audiophile quality". I have never seen any respectable journal or magazine in the industry make that claim.

  • Report this Comment On May 12, 2014, at 12:42 PM, madbulk wrote:

    Not audiophile. But perceived as audiophile. Irrelevant though. There's nothing in this ecosystem that is audiophile. Not for our purposes on Fool.com at least.

    For the most part, this is a "good enough" ecosystem. Compressed audio, Buds, Beats, Streaming services, walking around town or the gym listening to your music... there's nothing audiophile involved with any of this.

    Beats are portable, stylish, more immersive than buds and you pay dearly for them. It's a brand and a streaming service and it's gonna generate like mad.

    Audiophile talk is of no consequence. Bit players, as it were.

  • Report this Comment On May 13, 2014, at 7:18 AM, mlindl wrote:

    I am always stunned at how people miss Apple's point: this is a WEARABLE. While Google Glass users are thinking about having a camera over their eye, the Beats headphones range can actually offer enormous bits of cool stuff that might not yet be offered. If you are listening to your music via the iPhone or iPad touch and you have Siri access and there is a camera on the headphones and, and, and..... I do believe the streaming music is a big part of this but I also think that as a wearable, headphones have yet really to meet the computer age. There must be some HUGE software development opportunities here, otherwise Apple would NOT be going after it. I predicted 3 years before the iPhone that the iPod would morph into an iPhone. Imagine your headphones with a SIM card in it controlled by Siri with no keyboard, a camera, maybe controlled via your iWatch. The phone inside the headphones?

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2952666, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/24/2014 8:41:02 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement