Which Oil Majors Have the Greatest Exposure to Russia?

A closer look at BP plc, Royal Dutch Shell plc, and ExxonMobil’s exposure to Russia and whether that should worry investors.

May 19, 2014 at 6:00PM

As Vladimir Putin continues to test the limits of the Western world's patience with aggressive actions in Ukraine, investors are growing increasingly concerned about Western energy companies' exposure to Russia. With the threat of additional sanctions against Russia looming large, let's take a closer look at some of the major Western integrated oil companies that have the most at stake in the country.

Bp Thunderhorse

Photo credit: BP plc.

BP: the most exposed oil major
Of all the large Western oil majors, BP plc (NYSE:BP) is the most heavily exposed to growing geopolitical risk in Russia through its 19.75% stake in Rosneft. BP acquired the stake back in 2012 in exchange for selling its 50% interest in TNK-BP, one of Russia's biggest oil companies, to Rosneft -- a deal that also brought in $12.5 billion in cash for the British oil giant.

Geopolitical risk aside, the deal has so far been extremely beneficial to BP. In the fourth quarter, Rosneft accounted for about nearly 36% of BP's underlying profit of $2.8 billion. It also contributed production of 985,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day, or boe/d, representing about 30% of companywide fourth-quarter production of 3.2 million boe/d.

So far, BP's business hasn't been affected by Western sanctions, which have mainly included visa bans and asset freezes on Russian individuals and a Russian bank. But some worry that if geopolitical conditions worsen, the West could enforce additional measures aimed at crippling the Russian economy, including sanctions against Russia's energy sector, which would jeopardize BP's close relationship with Rosneft.

Other majors with significant Russia exposure
Other oil majors with a significant presence in Russia include ExxonMobil (NYSE:XOM) and Royal Dutch Shell plc (NYSE:RDS-A). Exxon formed a joint venture with Rosneft back in 2011 to explore for oil in western Siberia and in Russia's Arctic seas, ventures for which it will foot the majority of the more than $3.2 billion in exploration costs.

As of year-end 2013, the Irving, Texas-based oil giant held 85,000 net acres in Sakhalin and 11.3 million net acres in the Kara and Black seas through its joint venture with Rosneft. Though it doesn't disclose its production figures for Russia, analysts at Raymond James estimate that its operations in Russia accounted for about 6% of its total production last year.

Similarly, Shell is working with Gazprom on a huge LNG venture in the far east of Russia called Sakhalin-2, which is Russia's first offshore gas project and accounted for about 5% of global LNG capacity in 2012. The Anglo-Dutch oil major also owns a 100% interest in three major Russian exploration and production licenses, as well as a 50% interest in western Siberia's Salym fields alongside Gazprom.

Though Shell has previously stated that it plans to expand Sakhalin-2's capacity by as much as 50% to capitalize on growing gas demand from nearby Asian countries, the company's chief financial officer, Simon Henry, recently stated that Shell won't be "jumping into new investments [in Russia] in the short term."

Should investors be concerned?
BP, Exxon, and Shell all have significant exposure to Russia. If the U.S. and its allies were to impose a ban on the export of Western oil and gas technology to new projects being undertaken by Kremlin-controlled companies, it would probably dash Exxon and Shell's ambitions to explore areas like western Siberia and the Arctic seas.

The fallout would probably be even greater for BP, since the imposition of such sanctions would almost certainly reduce Rosneft's share price even further. On the plus side, however, sanctions currently being prepared wouldn't affect existing projects and therefore would have a minimal impact on these companies' production levels, not including natural declines.

All told, BP, Exxon, and Shell's exposure to Russia is a meaningful risk -- albeit one that may already be priced in -- and one that investors should carefully consider before investing in these companies. While there's a good chance that the situation won't escalate out of control, given the codependent relationship between Russia and the West, there's always the possibility that things could get worse.

I'd stay away from these stocks until the dust settles, because they're just not worth the risk -- especially considering their increasingly challenged business model and generally poor prospects for production growth -- with the exception of BP, whose valuation, strong prospects for cash flow growth, and high dividend yield are quite compelling.

OPEC is absolutely terrified of this game-changer
While there's trouble brewing in Russia, America's energy picture is rosier than it has been in decades. Oil exports from America continue to rise as our country gains energy independence. And there is one company front and center that is poised to make its investors rich. Warren Buffett has already committed to it, and you can too. Click here to learn about this company in The Motley Fool's special report: "OPEC's Worst Nightmare."

Arjun Sreekumar and The Motley Fool have no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information