Intel Corporation Can Claim Lost Glory

Larger organizations are often reluctant to change, and this reluctance can be very damaging especially for technology giants like Intel (NASDAQ: INTC  ) , which has demonstrated such resistance to change for quite a while, and has instead been relying too much on its personal computer segment. The rapid decline of the PC segment is finally forcing the company to consider other avenues of growth. While the initial handheld incursions have not been rewarding, Intel is in a position to regain past glory by embracing ARM. 

Segments
The company generated approximately 63% and 21% of revenue from its PC and data-center groups, respectively, during 2013. In short, the company relies heavily on the PC and server industry, and the changing fortunes of the PC industry are forcing Intel to explore new avenues of revenue generation.

Fundamental performance
The company posted revenue of $12.8 billion in Q1 2014, as compared to $13.8 billion in the previous quarter. This translates to a decline of 8%, sequentially, and a growth of 1.4% on a year-over-year basis. The decline, compared to the previous quarter, may be due to seasonal effects, as the revenue shows growth when compared to prior year. The PC and datacenter groups were the primary revenue-generating segments for the company, as usual. The main reason for the meager growth was the fact that the 4.8% growth in data-center revenue was partially offset by the decline in PC group revenue. The 61% decline in the mobile segment, despite Intel's efforts in that space, is alarming.

Source: SEC filings

Intel is trying to offset its PC losses by exploring growing segments like the Internet of Things, or IoT, and the smartphone/tablet front. It is not gaining traction in the mobile space, despite its efforts, because of factors like x86's power and price disadvantages compared with ARM.

Moreover, the company is lacking economies of integration, as its first integrated SoC, SoFiA, has yet to be released. The IoT gained market share because medical and automotive-embedded applications are not power critical like smartphones and tablets, and the high-performing x86 is a viable solution for embedded systems.

The company posted net income of $1.97 billion in Q1 2014, which translates into a 5% year-over-year decline. Intel posted an EPS of $0.38, compared to $0.40 in the same quarter last year. Note that the EPS surpassed analyst estimates of $0.37 for the quarter, but net income declined, despite an increase in revenue due to relatively high R&D and M&A expenses.

Future prospects
Intel shipped chips for 5 million tablets this quarter, and management believes the company is on track to achieve the 40 million target set for 2014. The main design wins were from ASUS and Lenovo.

Intel is targeting white-box tablets and there have been reports that it will provide subsidies and sell processing parts for $5 to compete with local manufacturers like Rockchip. Presently, Rockchip's parts are manufactured using the 28nm process, while Intel's parts will be using at least 20nm. It is assumed that Intel will not roll out 14nm for the low-end market due to the high cost structure of the manufacturing process. 20nm x86 cannot compete with 28nm ARM as far as cost basis, which is why subsidies are being offered to manufacturers.

Intel may gain some market share and achieve the target of 40 million this year but a loss will be reported in the mobile segment due to subsidy based-marketing. This is only a short-term solution and Intel must earn high-end design wins to stay relevant in the mobile space. This is not going to happen until it rolls out an integrated LTE SoC, because Qualcomm offers integrated SoCs and achieves economies of integration. Plus, the latest Qualcomm SoC offers enriched support (in terms of camera), which Intel does not offer.

The foundry business is the answer to PC industry misfortunes. If Intel embraces ARM and starts manufacturing for ARM on its leading edge process technologies, it can gain a significant presence in the mobile space and the management has shown its intent to do so. In a departure from his predecessors, Intel's CEO, Brian Krzanich, said that he is willing to build chips that compete with Intel's own. The decision to use foundries for ARM manufacturing will be a critical success factor for Intel in the coming years.

Bottom line
Recent financial results reveal that PC is declining but the rate has slowed down. Intel's server business prospects are bright as always. However, the mobile situation is not positive and it is not expected to recover in the next year or so, at least not on the revenue and income front. Subsidized marketing may help Intel gain market share in the low-end Chinese market, but the main growth driver will be the effective use of foundries, i.e. the manufacture of ARM based chips. All in all, data-center revenue will help Intel sustain its earnings for now, but it should embrace ARM to continue as the leader of the semiconductor industry.

Top dividend stocks for the next decade
The smartest investors know that dividend stocks simply crush their non-dividend paying counterparts over the long term. That's beyond dispute. They also know that a well-constructed dividend portfolio creates wealth steadily, while still allowing you to sleep like a baby. Knowing how valuable such a portfolio might be, our top analysts put together a report on a group of high-yielding stocks that should be in any income investor's portfolio. To see our free report on these stocks, just click here now.

 

Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On May 22, 2014, at 8:49 AM, Bagehi wrote:

    The PC isn't in the of oft spouted decline you have repeated here. That is a misreading of statistics. While computer life is longer than in the early years of the personal computer, it has been this way for almost a decade and stabilized years ago. While small computer assemblers have gone out of business, it has been due to the rise of self-built computers. While Intel has recently seen a decline in processor sales, it has matched closely to the rise in sales of their competitor, AMD (primarily due to a shift in sourcing for gaming consoles).

    Mobile is a low margin, highly competitive market already. It is a fairly mature processor market. It is not a market that companies like Intel "have" to enter to survive, it is a market that Intel is attempting to carve out some space in because it is a similar enough market to their bread and butter to have a low cost of entry for them, and thus fairly low risk.

    While I agree with you that the x86 processors are the wrong chip design (due to power consumption) for mobile applications right now, I would contend that Intel is betting on rapidly improving battery technology to eventually catch up and make the difference between ARM and x86 negligible (in that both would last at least a day of use), leading to the processor with more potential for improved processing speed winning out in a few years.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2967026, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/21/2014 12:37:38 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement