Why AstraZeneca plc Shareholders Should Be Furious

It's difficult to overstate the shock I'm feeling over AstraZeneca's (NYSE: AZN  ) rejection of Pfizer's (NYSE: PFE  ) generous offer. The floundering company is in the middle of a much needed transformation, but the commercial potential of its pipeline is full of unknowns. Upcoming patent losses and recent difficulties successfully launching new drugs have investors rightfully nervous. Let's take a look at the company's recent track record and see why the board's decision to gamble on an uncertain future rather than accept an enormous gain in the present seems mistaken.

Rose-tinted lab goggles
In an effort to inflate Pfizer's offer AstraZeneca has touted a handful of clinical-stage assets with lofty expectations. One of these is MEDI4736, an anti-PDL1 candidate that takes the brakes off the immune system, allowing it to more aggressively attack tumors. Earlier this month the company announced the beginning of a pivotal lung cancer trial with the candidate, to follow a successful phase 1 assessment.

The early stage results are promissing, but AstraZeneca's peak sales estimate of $6.5 billion annually is hard to swallow. The figure doesn't seem to account for potential pressure from other immuno-oncology drugs, many of which are in later-stage trials and may come to market earlier. Hopefully AstraZeneca will have promising data at the ASCO conference that supports the lofty sales estimate; if not, I expect we'll hear more grumbling from shareholders.

Expirations
While the future of AstraZeneca's oncology assets are uncertain, losses due to major patent expirations are imminent. Sales have fallen hard over the past couple years, and the loss of the company's top two products -- Crestor and Nexium -- will make reversing the trend increasingly difficult.

AZN Revenue (TTM) Chart

AZN Revenue (TTM) data by YCharts

Combined the drugs comprised more than 35% of first quarter revenue. Sales of heartburn blockbuster Nexium should feel the heat of generic competition beginning next month. After winning a patent fight with Actavis last year, AstraZeneca isn't expecting its statin Crestor to lose exclusivity until May 2016.

Recent launches
With a great deal of luck AstraZeneca's clinical stage assets might begin plugging holes left by exclusivity losses a couple years from now, but the bulk of responsibility lies on recently launched products. Sadly, the company's track record for new product launches is less than inspirational.

Brilinta has been a disappointment for several reasons. US doctors have been reluctant to adopt the new medication, and a US Justice Department probe into the study that led to its approval isn't helping either. The company is predicting billions annually, but more than two-and-a-half years following FDA approval, US sales of Brilinta reached just $28 million in the first quarter.

On a brighter note, AstraZeneca's oral type 2 diabetes therapy Forxiga -- Farxiga in the US -- beat Johnson & Johnson's (NYSE: JNJ  ) Invokana to approval in the EU by nearly a year. Unfortunately this is another potential blockbuster off to a slow start. AstraZeneca hasn't published sales data for the drug since fully acquiring it from Bristol-Myers Squibb, but the former partner sold just $23 million of the first-in-class therapy last year.

What a Fool believes
Soriot insists the company can bring 2017 revenue in line with 2013, but even that dismal projection includes a great deal of luck. Looking forward, the clinical stage cancer immunotherapy assets have potential, but the company needs to adjust its estimates downward to account for general development and market risk. Looking back, the (at least thus-far) problematic launches of both Brilinta and Forxiga hardly inspire confidence.

Over the next several years I find it hard to believe investors will see share prices anywhere near what Pfizer is offering now. It's the combined tax advantages of a UK domicile, and potential partnership synergies make the deal worthwhile, which makes Pfizer the only company positioned to profit from a $118 billion acquisition of the transitioning behemoth. I believe this is a great opportunity -- if management doesn't squander it.

Why gamble when you can invest in a clear winner along with Warren Buffett today?
Imagine a company that's renting a very specific and valuable piece of machinery for $41,000... per hour (that's almost as much as the average American makes in a year!). And Warren Buffett is so confident in this company's can't-live-without-it business model, he just loaded up on 8.8 million shares. An exclusive, brand-new Motley Fool report details this company that already has over 50% market share. Just click HERE to discover more about this industry-leading stock... and join Buffett in his quest for a veritable landslide of profits!


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (4)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On May 25, 2014, at 4:09 PM, cajun1958 wrote:

    I agree wholeheartedly, When the takeover by Pfizer was first put forward, AZN had 3 logical responses that would benefit owners:

    1) agree but get more money from PFE and some vague guarantees of keeping some AZN research centers open & people working (this guarantee does nothing for AZN shareholders but increases chance that the deal will not be blocked by UK & EU).

    2) find a white knight with a better offer & let the bids roll in.

    3) acquire a large biologic like Gilead or Cubist financed with debt to act as a poison pill and to give AZN a pipeline now rather than later; this could be justified as being in shareowners interest barely.

    Instead they have determined to remain another big pharma (BMY, ENDO) with expiring patents and hopeful oncology trials which every company has; meanwhile Crestor a drug that is arguably better than Lipitor for some patients will expire and leave them with a lot of expired patents and niche market treatments along with a large consumer portfolio.......sounds like BMY or GSK. It gas traded in mid 60s for a long time, now that PFE has pointed out its value, it may trade in low 70s and pay a reliable dividend which some share owners may find just fine but I think they missed the boat.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2966976, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/24/2014 7:23:54 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement