Can This MIT Start-Up Challenge Google's High-Flying Plans for Wind Energy?

The Makani Airborne Wind Turbine may power your home for less than a coal-fired power plant as soon as 2015. Source: Makani Power.

Step aside, Google (NASDAQ: GOOGL  ) (NASDAQ: GOOG  ) , an MIT start-up has its own plans for the future of tethered wind power. Altaeros Energies has developed the Buoyant Air Turbine, or BAT, to compete with the fixed-wing Airborne Wind Turbine, or AWT, from Google-owned Makani Power. The rationale for designing such systems is quite simple: higher-altitude winds are faster and more consistent than those in lower altitudes, the costs associated with installment and production are greatly reduced, and the number of economical sites for wind energy increases substantially.

The opportunity is enormous. Knowing that, can a start-up really compete with Google in the quest to expand the world's wind capacity beyond tower-based wind turbines operated by producers such as NextEra Energy (NYSE: NEE  ) ?

Not so fast
While both the BAT and AWT will take to the skies to access more reliable winds to produce cheaper energy, Altaeros and Google are pursuing radically different commercialization strategies. The 30-kilowatt BAT is not designed to compete with or replace conventional tower turbines. Instead, Altaeros will commercialize its technology platform in pursuit of rapidly deployable applications in remote regions. The market opportunity is actually quite enormous, encompassing rural communities, agricultural operations, disaster relief, military efforts, offshore power applications, and more. Furthermore, the BAT could enable electricity costs of just $0.18 per kilowatt-hour.

Google, on the other hand, aims to disrupt tower-based turbines and steal power-generating customers such as NextEra Energy from traditional turbine manufacturers. After successfully demonstrating a small 30-kilowatt AWT, the company is pursuing a utility-scale product with a capacity of 600 kilowatts, or enough to power 300 homes, called Wing7. At just 10 metric tons, Wing7 will be designed with 90% fewer materials than the average onshore turbine, which weighs 100 metric tons and sports a capacity of 1,000 kilowatts. In other words, Google's design will be six times more efficient at producing power on a per-mass basis.

The varying strategies are also exemplified by the differing operating altitudes between BAT and AWT.

Design

Capacity

Altitude Range

BAT

30 kW

1,000 ft to 2,000 ft

AWT

30 kW

130 ft to 360 ft

AWT (Wing7)

600 kW

460 ft-1,020 ft

Source: Altaeros Energies, Makani Power.

Despite each having a 30-kilowatt design, there doesn't appear to be much crossover in approach. Google seems focused on the larger utility-scale market, while Altaeros Energies will focus on niche markets. That doesn't mean traditional manufacturers won't take notice, however.

Disrupting land turbines
Google could become a big headache for manufacturers of traditional tower-based wind turbines and a favorite partner for wind-energy leader NextEra Energy for three reasons: installation costs, production costs, and geographic reach. Installation costs would be reduced by 50% by eliminating 90% of the materials required. Similarly, a smaller footprint would result in faster deployment and construction. Production costs would be lower thanks to reduced installation costs and higher capacity factors, or how often the unit produces at its rated capacity. It all comes down to reaching higher altitude winds and a larger cross section of winds than even the largest tower-based turbines.

Source: Makani Power.

That allows the AWT to generate more power at more wind speeds, which significantly outdoes the reach of tower-based turbines. Imagine how much further NextEra Energy could expand its 10,200 megawatts of wind capacity with AWTs.

Geographic feasibility of tower-based turbines (blue) at 100 meters and AWT (yellow) at 250 meters. Source: Makani Power.

You'll notice that the reach of Google's design extends farther offshore than traditional designs, too. That's because 75% of the estimated 4,000 gigawatts of wind capacity offshore the United States resides in waters at least 30 meters deep -- depths that are unserviceable by tower-based systems. By contrast, the AWT could operate in waters hundreds of meters deep.

Foolish takeaway
Altaeros Energies and Google's Makani Power will probably not cross paths based on their initial commercialization strategies. One will focus on power generation in remote regions for specific applications, while the other will push to develop utility-scale projects and products. In any case, the energy market has plenty of room for both, even if they were directly competing. At any rate, the biggest winners of successful deployment of both technologies will be industrial project managers and power producers, who can pass savings to taxpayers and consumers while capturing higher profits for investors. I'll certainly be keeping an eye on both disruptive technologies.

Get blown away by these dividend stocks
NextEra Energy sports a healthy dividend and a growing business, but it may be too reliant on government tax credits to smooth out the installment costs of its tower-based wind farms, which account for 56% of its generation portfolio. Still, knowing how valuable a dividend portfolio might be, you may want to know how to build one of your own. Our top analysts put together a report on a group of high-yielding stocks that should be in any income investor's portfolio. To see our free report on these stocks, just click here now.


Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (2)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On May 26, 2014, at 10:21 AM, MikeBarnard wrote:

    Altaeros is much more realistic than Makani. They've got good hype but unrealistic expectations. They have numerous challenges.

    - Unlike current wind turbines, their devices cannot be placed on existing, working farmland or areas with any secondary uses

    - They must be placed a minimum of 1.5 km from public roads and power lines

    - They may not get permission to fly with unmarked, unlit tethers, and their approach won’t work with increased tether drag

    - They must be spaced further apart than equivalent wind generators, amplifying secondary use issues

    - Maintenance will likely require shutting down portions of the wind farm due to safety concerns

    - Significantly increased maintenance cycles will likely reduce capacity factors to HAWT levels or below

    - They will be unable to operate in a greater range of adverse conditions and will be more susceptible to damage when grounded

    - Avian mortality will likely be higher than for current wind generation technology

    Read more at http://cleantechnica.com/2014/02/19/googles-makani-regulator...

  • Report this Comment On May 26, 2014, at 11:39 AM, TMFBlacknGold wrote:

    @MikeBarnard,

    Thanks for the thoughtful comment and information! I'll check it out and might have to write more on this.

    Maxxwell

  • Report this Comment On May 26, 2014, at 11:27 PM, MikeBarnard wrote:

    Maxxwell, all airborne wind generation is challenged in one of several ways. Altaeros is fairly wise in targeting a specific niche of remote locations, although it's unclear that shipping in increasingly expensive helium to remote locations on a regular basis is cost competitive. Shipping in wind turbines that just sit there costs more initially but has much lower operational costs, and there are lots of remote wind farms.

    Altaeros is quick set up and can provide a platform for aerial surveillance and antennas. That's advantageous sites which expect to be moved around, like drill rigs and military bases. I'm not so sure about towns somehow. The bundling of WiFi with Altaeros is an indicator of potential use cases, but it's also something with limited range as a comms mechanism; even 1000 feet requires high-gain directional antennas at the device. Will people really carry a small dish around and point it at the blimp?

    For a survey of engineering compromises involved in the design decisions for airborne wind energy, have a look at this. In general, it's an interesting place to spend academic research grants, but a much less interesting place to spend commercial investment money.

    http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/03/airborne-wind-energy-pla...

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2966496, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/24/2014 6:09:15 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement