Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.



Here’s Why Intel Shouldn’t Copy Hewlett-Packard’s Layoff Strategy

With shares of Hewlett-Packard (NYSE: HPQ  ) soaring on continued cost cutting despite an unfavorable revenue growth picture, a common sentiment among some frustrated Intel (NASDAQ: INTC  ) shareholders is that the company should – in the absence of a revenue growth story – start cutting costs by laying off employees. While this may seem like an attractive measure in the short term to juice earnings per share, this would be a long-term mistake.

HP is soaring, but it's not very richly valued
Take a closer look at HP's stock price increase. While the shares have roughly tripled from their $12 trough hit back in 2012, it's important to note that HP has "soared" because the stock was – in hindsight – ridiculously undervalued. After the initial pessimism after it took a rather large writedown as a result of its botched acquisition of Autonomy (that totally tanked GAAP net income), the market began to realize that the stock was dirt cheap at a mid-single digit multiple of free-cash-flow.

Today, even after tripling, the stock trades at a hair under 12 times GAAP net income. The good news is that HP is still "cheap," but the bad news is that because the company is still fundamentally grappling with a multi-year revenue decline, the market doesn't really want to pay a premium for the stock. Further, given that HP has juiced its bottom line by cutting expenses (the company announced that it would be laying off yet another 11,000 to 16,000 employees), investors may worry that HP may be cutting more than just fat (although to HP's credit, R&D spending seems to be trending up despite the cuts).

Intel is trying to become a growth name
Unlike HP, which seems to be more trying to become a "cash-cow" type of business, Intel has pretty clear ambitions to return to meaningful financial growth. The company's revenue peaked in 2011 at about $54 billion and has sort of hovered in the $53 billion-$54 billion for the last several years. This has largely been due to the fact that the company's PC Client Group business has been in decline while the firm's Data Center Group has been growing well enough to offset that decline.

While this "balancing act" can keep Intel's revenue roughly flat, it is unlikely that Intel can deliver meaningful revenue/profit growth or multiple expansion without growth in adjacent markets. The company's "Internet of Things" group is actually growing quite nicely, but it's still too small to alone drive growth in the face of a weakening PC Client Group. The Mobile & Communications Group offers the largest potential for upside, but of course this requires a very significant R&D investment.

Cost cutting is not the answer
Intel could lay off a bunch of employees and then eventually bring its cost structure down, boosting earnings. Done carefully to trim dead-weight, this is OK, but cutting into the company's core talent (either on the R&D side or the SG&A side) would be a long-term death sentence for the company. Sure, it could plod on for years while generating a ton of cash, but share price appreciation would be hard to come by as it would become increasingly difficult to grow net-income.

The dilemma that Intel faces is that it is just so wildly successful in the PC and server/data-center markets that in order to drive meaningful growth from current levels – especially in the face of the decline in PC-related revenues – it needs to tackle a big, adjacent market. That, whether investors like it or not, is ultra-mobile computing which requires high levels of R&D spend and is generally a cutthroat business. Intel's only way out of this revenue decline is pushing through into mobile. It's not going to be pretty -- nor is it going to be easy, but it's really the only way.

Foolish bottom line
If Intel reports continued revenue stagnation/declines in 2-3 years, then perhaps it will be time for Intel's management to reevaluate its growth ambitions. However, despite the lack of success the company has had so far with its mobile products (which have driven up R&D considerably), the products are becoming better with each iteration and hopefully will begin to drive profitable growth. Investors can't wait forever, but it's still far too soon for Intel to throw in the proverbial towel on its growth ambitions.

Leaked: Apple's next smart device (warning, it may shock you)
Apple recent recruited a secret-development Dream Team to guarantee their newest smart device was kept hidden from the public for as long as possible. But the secret is out...and some early viewers are even claiming its everyday impact could trump the iPod, iPhone, AND the iPad. In fact, ABI Research predicts 485 million of these type of devices will be sold per year. But one small company makes this gadget possible. And their stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early in-the-know investors. To be one of them, and see Apple's newest smart gizmo, just click here!

Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On May 27, 2014, at 9:11 PM, wastemaker wrote:

    I think the analysis on HP is not complete in this article. I guess the missing point is that HP had many mergers over the last few years. If someone worked in any multinational company where mergers (or spin-off) took place, would be able to appreciate the the current move of HP (workforce cuts). "Too many cooks spoil the stew" paradigm is best suited here to explain these cuts, and again just in my opinion, it is a smart and the right move (and most probably would be a continuous resource management task). This in turn does help in making the right decisions (deciding about growth aspects and getting rid of naysayers!).

    So, basically, I think HP is on the right track. I'm long HP with high-single digit forward PE, positive cash-flow, about 2% yield, and motivated smart executive management... nothing gets better than that in investing (at least the risk-reward equation makes it, if not great, a good buy).

  • Report this Comment On May 28, 2014, at 3:47 AM, kutani123 wrote:

    Lay-off is NOT bad at all and company MUST lay-off as condition got worse....

    Actually companies MUST lay-off (or clean up) after they wrongly hired tons of workers ( know to walk and breath and you're hired as Cisco did it at the .com boom) based on non-sense prediction growth or wrongly acquired many companies etc...

    Companies these days have lot of "talker", "abused" remote working system or "work from home", non-existing positions etc..

    Companies only keeps a bit of "talkers" presenting talking for the entire department but keep lot of "doer" workers whoare willing to do "more with less" and get appropriate award as mutual communication

    I believe HP has lot of those above mentioned workers

  • Report this Comment On May 30, 2014, at 9:18 AM, Danno98 wrote:

    HP is a cluster and not in the networking sense. Their acquisition strategy has been shown to be the result of being over served at happy hour. Phones, services, software and storage all overvalued, all over spent. The feet on the street get cut while the knuckleheads who made the decisions get their bonuses and parachutes.

    Cut the feet on the street - AFTER you have cut the ineffective VPs who smile, fill monthly spreadsheets, and provide NO tangible value.

    Yeah right, that will happen.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2970729, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/2/2015 10:31:37 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Ashraf Eassa

Ashraf Eassa is a technology specialist with The Motley Fool. He writes mostly about technology stocks, but is especially interested in anything related to chips -- the semiconductor kind, that is. Follow him on Twitter:

Today's Market

updated 1 hour ago Sponsored by:
DOW 16,351.38 293.03 1.82%
S&P 500 1,948.86 35.01 1.83%
NASD 4,749.98 113.87 2.46%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

9/2/2015 4:02 PM
HPQ $28.00 Up +0.19 +0.68%
Hewlett-Packard Co… CAPS Rating: ***
INTC $28.60 Up +0.78 +2.80%
Intel CAPS Rating: ****