Pfizer and AstraZeneca: There Are No Winners Here

AstraZeneca may have fended off Pfizer, but both companies have some explaining to do

May 27, 2014 at 7:00PM

U.S. stocks started this abbreviated trading week on a high note -- literally -- as the benchmark S&P 500 rose 0.6% on Tuesday to another all-time high. The narrower Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJINDICES:^DJI) gained 0.4%, with the technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index (NASDAQINDEX:^IXIC) was up 1.2%.

For a value investor like me, a one-way market makes me a little nervous. By the end of next month, assuming the market remains calm, we will have gone 1,000 days without a 10% correction in the S&P 500 -- and this is already the third longest such streak on record, according to the Bespoke Investment Group. Here's another statistic I came across this morning that does nothing to extinguish my concern: According to data compiled by Goldman Sachs and Bloomberg, a basket of 50 companies that rank lowest in terms of balance-sheet quality has risen 94% since the end of 2011, outperforming the S&P 500 almost 2-to-1 over that period. Despite that performance, I'd like to remind long-term investors that favoring quality businesses with pristine balance sheets (bought at reasonable valuations, naturally) is a much easier, less time-consuming, and less stressful way to invest.


The show's over, folks! Pfizer (NYSE:PFE) is going home empty-handed from its hunt after it formally renounced its pursuit of AstraZeneca (NYSE:AZN) yesterday. According to the City Code of Takeovers and Mergers (the City refers to the City of London, a city within London and its financial district), Pfizer's statement is binding for the next six months, unless AstraZeneca were to approach Pfizer at the end of August.

A week ago, I wrote:

Pfizer's final offer looks limp-wristed. By taking the possibility of a hostile offer off the table, Pfizer was just begging AstraZeneca to reject its offer. Frankly, I think Pfizer is relieved to have the opportunity to walk away.

Pfizer simply did not appear to have much taste for a fight, particularly as the deal became a political issue in the U.K. -- and, to a lesser extent, in the U.S.

For AstraZeneca, rebuffing Pfizer may have been a smart move in terms of protecting the longevity of its operations and its employees. On the other hand, Pfizer's final offer would have handed AstraZeneca shareholders a healthy premium for their shares:

Undisturbed AstraZeneca closing share price on April 17, before reports of Pfizer's interest

GBP 37.82 (1)

Average closing price over the 30-day period through April 17

GBP 38.97 (2)

Best Pfizer offer

GBP 55.00 per share

45% premium to (1), 41% premium to (2)

Highest closing price since April 17

GBP 48.24

Today's closing price

GBP 42.52

Sources: Yahoo! Finance, AstraZeneca.

However, the numbers in the table also suggest that the market never had much confidence in the odds of a successful Pfizer bid – witness the 12% discount that separates Pfizer's best offer and the highest closing price of AstraZeneca shares.

Still, I think the burden remains on the AstraZeneca board to give a better accounting of why the company wasn't even willing to sit down to begin negotiations with their pursuer. At 55 pounds per share, Pfizer's final offer appeared to offer full value -- and more! -- for AstraZeneca shares. Perhaps the firm's institutional investors will persuade the board to engage with Pfizer in three months' time, but my sense is that would come too late, as Pfizer appears to have lost all appetite for the deal.

If that is the case, Pfizer has a challenge of its own with regard to its shareholders: convincing them there is a path to growth that isn't predicated on a megaacquisition. That would be no mean feat, as M&A has been the linchpin of Pfizer's strategy for nearly 15 years.

Beyond Pfizer or AstraZeneca: Investing in the next wave of health care innovation
The Economist compares this disruptive invention to the steam engine and the printing press. Business Insider says it's "the next trillion-dollar industry." And the technology behind is poised to set off one of the most remarkable health care revolutions in decades. The Motley Fool's exclusive research presentation dives into this technology's true potential, and its ability to make life-changing medical solutions never thought possible. To learn how you can invest in this unbelievable new technology, click here now to see our free report.

Alex Dumortier, CFA, and The Motley Fool have no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information