Which NHL Playoff Team Gets the Most Bang for its Buck?

Don't let it get away!

Keep track of the stocks that matter to you.

Help yourself with the Fool's FREE and easy new watchlist service today.

For NHL fans, seeing their team hoist the Stanley Cup is what matters most. But now there's some pride to be had by winning the Fiscal Cup, the award that goes to the most cost-effective use of the money spent on players' salaries.

Money is what drives professional sports, and hockey is no exception. Teams pay players based on a fixed salary cap, which has a basement and a ceiling. Teams have to spend a minimum of around $44 million, but they can spend up to the projected 2013-14 cap of $64.3 million, according to

The money that goes into the cap is largely based on the league's television rights deals with Rogers Communications Inc.  (NYSE: RCI  ) in Canada and Comcast Corp.  (NASDAQ: CMCSA  ) in the United States. Rogers has a $5.2 billion, 12-year deal with the NHL while Comcast paid $2 billion for a 10-year deal to air games on NBC and NBC Sports Network.

All teams share equally from the TV revenue pool, but all teams do not spend their money equally.

Which team paid the least per win?

I examined the eight teams to make it past round one of the playoffs (all salary numbers come from CapGeek unless otherwise indicated) to see which one had the greatest chance of winning the Fiscal Cup. Turns out the strongest team on a dollars-per-playoff-win basis might not be the team that wins it all.

I compared each of the teams' total salary to the number of wins they earned in the postseason. Unsurprisingly, big spenders like the Chicago Blackhawks and the L.A. Kings are doing well, although two other high-salary teams -- the Boston Bruins and the Pittsburgh Penguins -- fell much earlier than expected to teams that paid significantly less per player and, consequently, per win. The Bruins, with a payroll of nearly $62 million, paid dearly for each postseason win -- $8,854,234.71 per win. 

Meanwhile, the Montreal Canadiens had the lowest overall payroll of the eight teams left after round one, coming in at approximately $45 million. That means the team paid $4,464,833.30 for each of its 10 postseason wins, by far the cheapest per win of any of the eight teams that made it to round three. If I declare a Fiscal Cup winner right now, based on the current win/loss record for all four teams in the Conference finals, the Canadiens would have clinched the title.

The season is not over, however, and Montreal can still be caught.

Projecting out into the Stanley Cup Finals, the Canadiens are officially done with hockey for the 2013-2014 season leaving the New York Rangers as the best bet for the Fiscal Cup winner. Should the Rangers win three games in the Stanley Cup finals, they will have paid a projected $3,599,500 per win, lower than either the Blackhawks or the Kings could come (after winning all 16 games and the actual Cup, by the way).

Here is a look, as of Friday, May 30, with at least one game left in the Western Conference, where each of the eight teams that at least escaped the first round of the playoffs stand on a dollars-per-win basis:

  • Boston Bruins: $8,854, 234.71 per win
  • Minnesota Wild: $8,062,542.67 per win
  • Pittsburgh Penguins: $7,874,166.71 per win
  • Anaheim Ducks: $6,949,761.85 per win
  • Chicago Blackhawks: $6,642,929.50 per win
  • L.A. Kings: $5,269,717.63 per win
  • New York Rangers: $4,499,375 per win
  • Montreal Canadiens: $4,464,833.30 per win

It's not all about how much you spend

It is important to keep in mind, however, that simply looking at overall salaries versus wins will not tell the whole story.

As teams advance, not only does their cost-per-win decrease, but their potential for other earnings increases. Merchandise and ticket sales over the next few seasons will increase as more fans become further invested in their team's narrative, and teams have the opportunity to raise ticket prices for each Stanley Cup round. Alternate revenue sources rise as well, such as requests for appearances by teams and team members, articles written, links clicked, and so on.

Popularity for a sports team is the greatest revenue source it could ask for. It leads to more money pumped into their system in various ways over the next several seasons. 

With games left to play, the Rangers are the most likely to kiss the Fiscal Cup, but the Kings still have a chance. Sadly, the Blackhawks won't crack $4 million per win, even winning all 16 games and the Stanley Cup. Though they still may be Stanley Cup winners, they are Fiscal Cup losers. However should the Kings advance to the Stanley Cup Finals and hold the Rangers to two wins or fewer, they will win the Fiscal Cup and have paid a mere $3,622,930.88 per win.

Speaking of winners...
Give us five minutes and we'll show how you could own the best stock for 2014. Every year, The Motley Fool's chief investment officer hand-picks one stock with outstanding potential. But it's not just any run-of-the-mill company. It's a stock perfectly positioned to cash in on one of the upcoming year's most lucrative trends. Last year his pick skyrocketed 134%. And previous top picks have gained upwards of 908%, 1,252% and 1,303% over the subsequent years! Believe me, you don't want to miss what could be his biggest winner yet! Just click here to download your free copy of "The Motley Fool's Top Stock for 2014" today.

Read/Post Comments (0) | Recommend This Article (2)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2977865, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/3/2015 3:36:19 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Kate Cimini

Kate Cimini is a writer, editor, Spanish-speaker and rabid hockey fan. Her work can be seen on sites such as SportsMockery, LightsTheLamp and Feministing, as well as in publications such as the Hartford Courant and Hartford Women Magazine. She resides in Connecticut. You can catch her on twitter @lightsthelamp where she mostly talks hockey and feminism with the occasional business thrown in there.

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 16,393.94 42.56 0.26%
S&P 500 1,950.84 1.98 0.10%
NASD 4,748.54 -1.44 -0.03%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

9/3/2015 3:20 PM
CMCSA $56.28 Up +0.40 +0.72%
Comcast Corp CAPS Rating: ***
RCI $33.80 Up +0.94 +2.86%
Rogers Communicati… CAPS Rating: ****