Which NHL Playoff Team Gets the Most Bang for its Buck?

While the New York Rangers' opponent in the Stanley Cup Finals has yet to be decided, the winner of the Fiscal Cup might already be apparent.

May 31, 2014 at 7:25AM

For NHL fans, seeing their team hoist the Stanley Cup is what matters most. But now there's some pride to be had by winning the Fiscal Cup, the award that goes to the most cost-effective use of the money spent on players' salaries.

Bbickell With

Money is what drives professional sports, and hockey is no exception. Teams pay players based on a fixed salary cap, which has a basement and a ceiling. Teams have to spend a minimum of around $44 million, but they can spend up to the projected 2013-14 cap of $64.3 million, according to CapGeek.com.

The money that goes into the cap is largely based on the league's television rights deals with Rogers Communications Inc. (NYSE:RCI) in Canada and Comcast Corp. (NASDAQ:CMCSA) in the United States. Rogers has a $5.2 billion, 12-year deal with the NHL while Comcast paid $2 billion for a 10-year deal to air games on NBC and NBC Sports Network.

All teams share equally from the TV revenue pool, but all teams do not spend their money equally.

Which team paid the least per win?

I examined the eight teams to make it past round one of the playoffs (all salary numbers come from CapGeek unless otherwise indicated) to see which one had the greatest chance of winning the Fiscal Cup. Turns out the strongest team on a dollars-per-playoff-win basis might not be the team that wins it all.

I compared each of the teams' total salary to the number of wins they earned in the postseason. Unsurprisingly, big spenders like the Chicago Blackhawks and the L.A. Kings are doing well, although two other high-salary teams -- the Boston Bruins and the Pittsburgh Penguins -- fell much earlier than expected to teams that paid significantly less per player and, consequently, per win. The Bruins, with a payroll of nearly $62 million, paid dearly for each postseason win -- $8,854,234.71 per win. 

Meanwhile, the Montreal Canadiens had the lowest overall payroll of the eight teams left after round one, coming in at approximately $45 million. That means the team paid $4,464,833.30 for each of its 10 postseason wins, by far the cheapest per win of any of the eight teams that made it to round three. If I declare a Fiscal Cup winner right now, based on the current win/loss record for all four teams in the Conference finals, the Canadiens would have clinched the title.

The season is not over, however, and Montreal can still be caught.

Projecting out into the Stanley Cup Finals, the Canadiens are officially done with hockey for the 2013-2014 season leaving the New York Rangers as the best bet for the Fiscal Cup winner. Should the Rangers win three games in the Stanley Cup finals, they will have paid a projected $3,599,500 per win, lower than either the Blackhawks or the Kings could come (after winning all 16 games and the actual Cup, by the way).

Here is a look, as of Friday, May 30, with at least one game left in the Western Conference, where each of the eight teams that at least escaped the first round of the playoffs stand on a dollars-per-win basis:

  • Boston Bruins: $8,854, 234.71 per win
  • Minnesota Wild: $8,062,542.67 per win
  • Pittsburgh Penguins: $7,874,166.71 per win
  • Anaheim Ducks: $6,949,761.85 per win
  • Chicago Blackhawks: $6,642,929.50 per win
  • L.A. Kings: $5,269,717.63 per win
  • New York Rangers: $4,499,375 per win
  • Montreal Canadiens: $4,464,833.30 per win

It's not all about how much you spend

It is important to keep in mind, however, that simply looking at overall salaries versus wins will not tell the whole story.

As teams advance, not only does their cost-per-win decrease, but their potential for other earnings increases. Merchandise and ticket sales over the next few seasons will increase as more fans become further invested in their team's narrative, and teams have the opportunity to raise ticket prices for each Stanley Cup round. Alternate revenue sources rise as well, such as requests for appearances by teams and team members, articles written, links clicked, and so on.

Popularity for a sports team is the greatest revenue source it could ask for. It leads to more money pumped into their system in various ways over the next several seasons. 

With games left to play, the Rangers are the most likely to kiss the Fiscal Cup, but the Kings still have a chance. Sadly, the Blackhawks won't crack $4 million per win, even winning all 16 games and the Stanley Cup. Though they still may be Stanley Cup winners, they are Fiscal Cup losers. However should the Kings advance to the Stanley Cup Finals and hold the Rangers to two wins or fewer, they will win the Fiscal Cup and have paid a mere $3,622,930.88 per win.

Speaking of winners...
Give us five minutes and we'll show how you could own the best stock for 2014. Every year, The Motley Fool's chief investment officer hand-picks one stock with outstanding potential. But it's not just any run-of-the-mill company. It's a stock perfectly positioned to cash in on one of the upcoming year's most lucrative trends. Last year his pick skyrocketed 134%. And previous top picks have gained upwards of 908%, 1,252% and 1,303% over the subsequent years! Believe me, you don't want to miss what could be his biggest winner yet! Just click here to download your free copy of "The Motley Fool's Top Stock for 2014" today.

Kate Cimini has no position in any stocks mentioned. She is a Chicago Blackhwaks fanatic. The Motley Fool recommends Rogers Communications (USA). Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information