Why Electronic Arts Will Finally Pay Current and Former NCAA Football Players

EA Sports and Collegiate Licensing Company have settled with three classes of plaintiffs, consisting of current and former football and basketball student athletes, for $40 million

Jun 4, 2014 at 11:47AM

Last Friday, Electronic Arts' (NASDAQ:EA) Sports and Collegiate Licensing Company announced a settlement resulting from several class action lawsuits that revolve around use of players' likenesses. The reported $40 million settlement could see as many as 200,000 former and current college football and basketball players be compensated for past use of their likenesses in EA Sports college football and basketball video games.

How much will each current and former student athlete receive?

That depends on how many of the current and former student athletes who are eligible file claims, but estimates have it anywhere from as low as $48 for each year an athlete was on the roster to $951 for each year the image of an athlete was used in a game, according to the Star-Telegram. To be eligible to file a claim, the current or former student athlete must believe his likeness, which can be a combination of his physical characteristics and biographical information like his home state, was used in video games created since 2003.

EA Sports has repeatedly defended its position that the physical characteristics of players in the games are not based on current or former student athletes, but evidence in the case, including emails from university presidents, paints a different picture. For example, former Big 12 Commissioner Dan Beebe once penned an email stating the conference's board was "uneasy with the exploitation of players' names and likenesses for commercial purposes."

Even more damning for EA Sports, Tim Tebow's name was found in the 2010 version of NCAA Football.

The class administrator will have the task of determining when a player's likeness was appropriated in the games. EA Sports is disclosing electronic spreadsheets that detail the players from the games, including their uniform number, position, and home state. 

One question that remains is whether current student athletes will be able to file claims and collect their share without losing their NCAA eligibility. Current NCAA rules prohibit student athletes from profiting off their likeness. However, Steve Berman, co-lead counsel for the plaintiffs in the Keller case, says the NCAA has already released statements saying they won't object to current student athletes who are eligible for the settlement filing claims.

Meanwhile, the lead plaintiffs in the three class actions this settlement covers – the Keller, O'Bannon, and Hart cases – will receive anywhere from $2,500 to $15,000 each. And, of course, the lawyers take home a big slice of the pie: $13.2 million, plus up to $2.5 million in legal fees.

What are the future implications of this settlement?

Although the settlement has no precedential value when it comes to the class action suits moving forward with the NCAA as a defendant, those who support the plaintiffs' claims see it as a victory.

Attorney Jeffrey Kessler, who filed an antitrust lawsuit against the NCAA in March claiming player compensation is unlawfully capped, says the settlement is one more step in the right direction.

"[The settlement] has implications as a precedent for the idea that these restrictions that prevent schools from letting the athletes earn any money for their likenesses need to come to an end."

Although the settlement doesn't directly impact the outcome of the O'Bannon case, set to go to trial next week, Kessler says it's consistent with the argument being made by the plaintiffs in that case. U.S. District Court Judge Claudia Wilken, who will preside over the O'Bannon case, has already indicated she will allow discussion about the video games.

How much did schools really make off the EA Sports video games?

I did some research on this last year, and I was shocked by the results. Five school shared with me their revenue numbers for both the football and basketball games produced by EA Sports for 2012-2013:


NCAA Football

NCAA Basketball













Texas A&M



Although none of the administrators were able to tell me the exact formula used by EA Sports to distribute revenue from the video games, they did tell me a school's ranking in the polls and appearances in either bowl games or March Madness play a role. They also told me the formula is calculated on a multiyear, rolling basis.

At this time, it appears neither schools nor student athletes will be banking cash from EA Sports in the future. The NCAA Basketball game was discontinued in 2010, and EA Sports announced with the recent settlement that it would also be discontinuing NCAA Football.

Taking into account that industry analysts have pegged EA Sports revenue from NCAA Football at $125 million annually (5% of EA Sports' total revenue), it makes sense they would agree to a $40 million settlement to avoid protracted and costly litigation in the three class action suits, which could have ultimately resulted in a far greater liability.

Are you ready for this $14.4 trillion revolution?

Have you ever dreamed of traveling back in time and telling your younger self to invest in Apple? Or to load up on Amazon.com at its IPO, and then just keep holding? We haven't mastered time travel, but there is a way to get out ahead of the next big thing. The secret is to find a small-cap "pure-play" and then watch as the industry -- and your company -- enjoy those same explosive returns. Our team of equity analysts has identified one stock that's ready for stunning profits with the growth of a $14.4 TRILLION industry. You can't travel back in time, but you can set up your future. Click here for the whole story in our eye-opening report.

Kristi Dosh has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information

Compare Brokers