No One Else Wants to Buy B/E Aerospace, So Why Should You?

With an embarrassing dearth of bidders for its business, B/E opts to split in two.

Jun 10, 2014 at 1:15PM

More than a month after manufacturer of aircraft interiors B/E Aerospace (NASDAQ:BEAV) first confirmed the rumors that it was for sale, not a single serious bidder has stepped up to the plate.

According to Bloomberg, France-based aircraft part suppliers Safran SA and Zodiac Aerospace were both potential bidders for B/E, after management of the latter confirmed the company was for sale. Not a peep has been heard out of either French companies since. Airplane builder Airbus (NASDAQOTH:EADSY) publicly denied interest in acquiring B/E in early May. A few weeks later, German aerospace supplier Diehl did likewise.

So, now that apparently no one in the entire global airplane industry is interested in buying it, B/E announced this morning that it's going to just split itself into two parts in hopes of generating some value for shareholders that way. Will it work?

The details
In a statement this morning, B/E outlined how it intends to divvy up its loot among shareholders, in a tax-free distribution set to take place in Q1 2015. The first half, which is what we today think of as B/E and what the company now dubs Manufacturing Co., will be the company's marquee airplane interiors business. This is the company that builds the innards of aircraft -- what you see when you enter the cabin of your Boeing (NYSE:BA) or Airbus passenger jet, and start hunting up and down the aisles for your seat -- or make a quick visit to the lavatory.

With $2.5 billion in annual sales and $510 million in annual earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, B/E says this business is earning EBITDA profit margins of 20.4%.

The other half of B/E, which includes the world's largest distribution business for the bolts and fasteners that hold airplanes together, as well as other "consumable" parts sales and aircraft services, will be monikered Services Co. B/E says this business did $1.6 billion in sales over the past year, and earned $365 million EBITDA thereon -- so about a 22.8% EBITDA margin.

So far, so good. But now we get to the tricky part: Are either of these two new, soon-to-be-separate companies worth buying?

Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?
For the life of me, I can't imagine why anyone would want to. While B/E Aerospace is certainly a fine business either as a whole or in parts -- it quite simply costs too much for an investor to profit from an investment in it.

Consider B/E's so-called Manufacturing Co. Entire and unsplit, B/E as a unified whole sells for 25.5 times trailing earnings, for a company which (according to S&P Capital IQ data) earns a 21.4% EBITDA profit margin. But Manufacturing Co. will supposedly be less profitable than that, with an EBITDA margin of only 20.4%.

With thousands of civilian planes sitting in the work backlogs of Airbus and Boeing, waiting to be outfitted by B/E, I see strong growth prospects for Manufacturing Co. But I can't imagine the part fetching a better valuation than the whole -- not if it's less profitable than the whole.

And consider the case of Services Co. Here we've got a modestly more profitable business, earning a 22.8% EBITDA margin. On the one hand, you might think this would win Services Co a P/E ratio superior to the 25.5 P/E at B/E as a whole. But rival fasteners producer Precision Castparts (NYSE:PCP) sells for only 22.5 times earnings, making B/E more expensive. And Precision Castparts boasts an EBITDA profit margin of 30.8%!

Foolish takeaway
If the idea of paying 13% more for a company that's 26% less profitable than Precision Castparts doesn't appeal to you -- then congratulations. I think you've just figured out why no one has bid to buy B/E so far.

As for the chances of someone paying a premium for B/E now that it's promised to split -- well, I'm not too keen on that prospect, either. Even if B/E succeeds in hitting the 19% long-term-growth target that analysts have set for it, the stock looks expensive at 25.5 times earnings. And S&P Capital IQ data reveal that the company is generating only about $202 million in free cash flow annually, or barely half of what B/E reports as its "net income" under GAAP.

Together as a whole, or split into pieces, this stock is quite simply too expensive to buy.

B/E won't make you money, but this stock could
Give us five minutes and we'll show how you could own the best stock for 2014. Every year, The Motley Fool's chief investment officer hand-picks one stock with outstanding potential. But it's not just any run-of-the-mill company. It's a stock perfectly positioned to cash in on one of the upcoming year's most lucrative trends. Last year his pick skyrocketed 134%. And previous top picks have gained upwards of 908%, 1,252% and 1,303% over the subsequent years! Believe me, you don't want to miss what could be his biggest winner yet! Just click here to download your free copy of "The Motley Fool's Top Stock for 2014" today.

Rich Smith has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Precision Castparts. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

A Financial Plan on an Index Card

Keeping it simple.

Aug 7, 2015 at 11:26AM

Two years ago, University of Chicago professor Harold Pollack wrote his entire financial plan on an index card.

It blew up. People loved the idea. Financial advice is often intentionally complicated. Obscurity lets advisors charge higher fees. But the most important parts are painfully simple. Here's how Pollack put it:

The card came out of chat I had regarding what I view as the financial industry's basic dilemma: The best investment advice fits on an index card. A commenter asked for the actual index card. Although I was originally speaking in metaphor, I grabbed a pen and one of my daughter's note cards, scribbled this out in maybe three minutes, snapped a picture with my iPhone, and the rest was history.

More advisors and investors caught onto the idea and started writing their own financial plans on a single index card.

I love the exercise, because it makes you think about what's important and forces you to be succinct.

So, here's my index-card financial plan:


Everything else is details. 

Something big just happened

I don't know about you, but I always pay attention when one of the best growth investors in the world gives me a stock tip. Motley Fool co-founder David Gardner (whose growth-stock newsletter was rated #1 in the world by The Wall Street Journal)* and his brother, Motley Fool CEO Tom Gardner, just revealed two brand new stock recommendations moments ago. Together, they've tripled the stock market's return over 12+ years. And while timing isn't everything, the history of Tom and David's stock picks shows that it pays to get in early on their ideas.

Click here to be among the first people to hear about David and Tom's newest stock recommendations.

*"Look Who's on Top Now" appeared in The Wall Street Journal which references Hulbert's rankings of the best performing stock picking newsletters over a 5-year period from 2008-2013.