Why I Still Can't Get Behind NQ Mobile Inc.

Look, I get it. Trading under five times next year's expected earnings, shares of NQ Mobile  (NYSE: NQ  ) look ridiculously cheap right now. But I'm still not biting.

Sure, NQ stock roared 34% higher in a single day last week, after the Chinese Internet services company stated its special committee's independent investigation yielded no evidence of fraud. At first glance -- and contrary to my previous assertion its battle was far from over -- it appeared NQ Mobile had cleared its name in the face of extensive fraud allegations brought by noted short seller Muddy Waters.

Investors are waiting on two key items
So why, then, have shares of NQ Mobile steadily given up most of those gains over the past week? Look no further than the fact NQ still hasn't received an unqualified audit, or filed its twice-delayed annual report on form 20-F as required by the SEC. Until investors see both of these things happen, the stock is likely to remain under pressure.

And that's not to mention the fact NQ's own report admitted the investigation team "observed indications that some information might be missing," and this on "many devices" it collected from senior management and from professionals "related to the company's activities as referred to in the Muddy Waters allegations."

Carson Block of Muddy Waters unsurprisingly pounced on this point, stating, "Given that there was data tampering during an investigation that dragged on far longer than should have been allowed, it is clear that management was able to stay a step ahead of the investigation by changing and deleting data."

What's more, Block speculates the admission in NQ's report was "undoubtedly the result of a negotiation between the advisors and the company, and [...] almost certainly understates the severity of the problem."

And I agree: If NQ truly wants to be transparent, it needs to release the full report so we know the extent of its data tampering.

Why the divestments?
Keeping in mind NQ Mobile ended 2013 with a total cash position of $283 million, I also find myself unconvinced by the timing and need for NQ to sell small stakes in its subsidiaries.

Roughly two weeks ago, NQ Mobile announced it would sell up to 5.88% of its wholly owned gaming subsidiary FL Mobile for $25 million -- $15 million from China-based Bison Capital and $10 million from "other investors." That valued FL Mobile at approximately $425 million.

Then, earlier this week, NQ agreed to sell 3.4% of NationSky for $18 million to Beijing Guorun Qilian Venture Capital Center, which gives the subsidiary alone at $530 million valuation. NQ also states it will sell another 2.3% of NationSky for $12 million to "other investors within the next two months," and plans to use the funds for research and development, marketing, working capital activities and the expansion of NationSky's core operations."

The kicker? NQ goes on to tease the investors have the right to "demand the redemption of their shares" if NationSky doesn't complete a qualified IPO or find a third-party buyer for a valuation of at least $550 million within 24 months. A similar caveat went for its FL Mobile announcement, which comes with a redemption right if FL Mobile doesn't complete an IPO within 12 months.

And that's all well and good, especially considering the combined post-money valuations of FL Mobile and NationSky are said to be $955 million, or more than twice NQ Mobile's entire market cap of $465 million as of this writing.

But here's my question: Why in the world would these hedge funds want to purchase small stakes in NQ Mobile's subsidiaries at these valuations, when they could instead simply buy NQ's own massively undervalued common stock? Or perhaps NQ is just that convincing, and maybe the deals were struck more to highlight the underlying value of NQ Mobile's combined businesses to investors.

Foolish takeaway
In the end, though, there are just too many red flags that continue to crop up, and something just doesn't smell right to me. That's not to say NQ Mobile couldn't fully exonerate itself going forward, in which case its loyal investor base would be handsomely rewarded. But if this unravels and NQ is eventually exposed as a fraud, the risk is a total loss. Call me crazy, but that's a risk I'm not willing to make.

Consider these top dividend stocks for the next decade
After all, there's a better way to put your money to work and rest easy. In fact, the smartest investors know that dividend stocks simply crush their non-dividend paying counterparts over the long term. That's beyond dispute. They also know that a well-constructed dividend portfolio creates wealth steadily, while still allowing you to sleep like a baby. Knowing how valuable such a portfolio might be, our top analysts put together a report on a group of high-yielding stocks that should be in any income investor's portfolio. To see our free report on these stocks, just click here now.


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (4)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 12, 2014, at 8:08 PM, abigchocoholic wrote:

    In the end, though, there are just too many red flags that continue to crop up, and something just doesn't smell right to me.

    -----------------------

    The only red flag I see is the one comment from the independent investigation. "observed indications that some information might be missing," and this on "many devices" it collected from senior management and from professionals "related to the company's activities as referred to in the Muddy Waters allegations."

    But this would be things like deleted texts or messages off mobile phones right? How in the world could these propagate a fraud when the investigators got to look at sales receipts and bank account records? I mean it's not that difficult to look at sales receipts is it? Either the sale was made and the revenue booked and the money deposited in the bank or it wasn't. The rest is pretty much immaterial. The only fraud here that would count would be lying about sales--meaning revenue and cash that is in reality much lower than reported. If they actually made all the money they said they made and actually have all the cash in the bank they say they have, it's a legit company.

  • Report this Comment On June 14, 2014, at 10:13 AM, investor2 wrote:

    NQ get off the fence, this outfit is right in a good place The company enriches your smartphone experience and provides security and cloud storage. There is no hoter market sector.I was wondering why then was the stock going down. Why would the board let these short sellers get away with what they are doing. Simple answer Nq is buying back its shares and lots of em. . Better get a piece of the pie before its gone. If the company is buying back its shares at bargain prices why not let short sellers have their ridiculous claims. The truth is the only thing found by the audit was they understated a small insignificant amount of income. Remember the claim was they overstated the income.Earnings are good and not surprising smartphones almost considered the best thing since the invention of the computer. I would be quite surprised if anyone in the smartphone,cloud storage,wimax,internet security business could find a way to lose . Income is increasing at a good pace for NQ as money pours into smartphones and anything that goes along with them. The only way to keep the price down on this stock would be to divert attention from the truth. I found that almost everything the shorts have said about this company is completely without merit. I guess we live in a time when people believe it OK to lie about anything that will produce a paycheck even at the expense of great innovators and all the people who are standing behind them. I for one believe these short sellers should have to make restitution for false allegations made.This company has proved these shorts to be the only "Massive Fraud" This company has a great product to sell,these short sellers have nothing but the proceeds stolen from the company and its shareholders in this scheme . I have learned how to tell if these short sellers are lying, if their lips are moving.BUY,BUY

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2992494, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/22/2014 6:30:00 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement