Why Companies With Women Executives Succeed More Often

A new fund invests specifically in companies with female leadership. Is this simple social justice -- or an astute investment strategy?

Jun 15, 2014 at 1:00PM

Wikipedia / Grace Villamil.

Sallie Krawcheck, a notable Wall Street figure, has partnered with Pax World Management to develop a new index fund. The Pax Ellevate Global Women's Index Fund (NASDAQMUTFUND:PXWEX) invests globally in companies' female executives, board members and female-friendly policies. 

The business case 
While there are obvious social reasons behind the fund, Ms. Krawcheck emphasizes the business angle of her venture: 

Research indicates that companies with more women in senior management have higher returns on capital, lower volatility, greater client focus, increased innovation and greater long-term orientation. As a result, I believe they should also deliver better stockholder returns over time.

Boards with women outperform -- especially in crises 
There is evidence to back up her claims. While some academics don't find any positive effects to gender diversity, Thomson Reuters released a study in 2013 that showed improved share price performance with gender diversity.

Credit Suisse researchers reported similar findings. Looking at 2,500 companies worldwide between 2005 and 2011, it reported that while companies with female board members outperformed slightly in good times, the real benefits appeared from 2008 onwards.

In other words, companies with more gender diversity outperformed during the crisis. To borrow the words of the Credit Suisse researchers, they tend to look defensive, outperform when markets are falling, deliver higher average returns on equity, and experience less volatility in earnings. 

It's the return on equity that's most striking -- while share price is nice, the real long term benefits of an investment comes from the underlying business performance. And indeed, large companies with greater female representation have better returns on equity and sales. 

How can you tell if a company is "Good"? 
While the literature on female board membership seems pretty solid, looking at diversity programs in large organizations yields fewer clear results. What is an investor interested in social policies to do?

One large review paper, published in the academic journal Human Resources Management, emphasizes the importance of support for diversity programs from the top; in other words, when top-level management is perceived to support diversity measures, they're more likely to succeed. Whether or not the fund will use this as a factor in their investment model is anyone's guess; however, it's probably not a bad shorthand for those of us analyzing our investments with fewer resources.

The idea of a shorthand might also be handy because a company's situation is an important part of whether a diversity program will be successful, and this might be hard to analyze from the outside. For example, a company that's already rather diverse will have an easier time than one starting from scratch, and those with cultures of openness and creative conflict might fare better as well.  

The joy of more data
It will be interesting to see the birth of the new fund and to look at its performance over time. I for one am quite interested in the idea of putting one's money where one's mouth is -- perhaps a testament to the overall growth of values-based investments. 

But this could be much more than a social experiment -- we could very well be seeing the birth of an interesting new investment strategy.

Top dividend stocks for the next decade
The smartest investors know that dividend stocks simply crush their non-dividend paying counterparts over the long term. That’s beyond dispute. They also know that a well-constructed dividend portfolio creates wealth steadily, while still allowing you to sleep like a baby. Knowing how valuable such a portfolio might be, our top analysts put together a report on a group of high-yielding stocks that should be in any income investor’s portfolio. To see our free report on these stocks, just click here now.

Anna Wroblewska has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information