Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.



Is This Intel Corporation's Biggest Risk?

Every business faces certain risks, and management must disclose their biggest worries in annual and quarterly SEC filings. Today, I'll take a look at the biggest real danger I see in the latest risk recap from semiconductor giant Intel (NASDAQ: INTC  ) . As an Intel shareholder myself, this is a topic of burning interest.

In the latest available Section 1A risk factors listing, Intel walks us through 26 different warnings. Some are mundane, industry wide, or even broader, like the stern look at climate change, or the need to attract and retain key personnel. Investors everywhere already worry about these ultra-generic issues, and I'm looking for something more specific to Intel this time.

On that end, Intel stares down a plethora of company-specific challenges. The company worries about monetizing its intellectual property portfolio, hackers stealing or damaging vital data, and misjudging production levels along the complex process of manufacturing microprocessors.

Even so, one warning stands out like a sore thumb...

A new chip factory under construction in Hillsboro, Oregon. Source: Intel.

No. 1 with a few bullets!
At the very top of Intel's list of risk factors, you'll find this beast: "Changes in product demand may harm our financial results and are hard to predict."

Yes, indeed. And that's just the title of this risk factor.

Diving deeper into the enclosed paragraph of management's discussion, you'll find lots of thorns ready to poke a hole in Intel's business.

  • Macroeconomic issues can hurt Intel's sales.

  • So can soft consumer confidence and shrinking corporate IT budgets.

  • Rivals can launch price wars or present game-changing innovations.

  • System builders could prefer another chip designer's chip designs.

  • Natural disasters, sudden market shifts, or simple human error can put unexpected bottlenecks in Intel's supply chain.

All of these issues can conspire to turn one of Intel's biggest business advantages into a costly problem. I'm talking about the company's network of in-house manufacturing facilities.

Intel helped invent the semiconductor as we know it, and continues to drive the state of the art forward. A generous portion of the company's $2.8 billion quarterly research budget goes toward improved manufacturing technologies. Intel puts these theoretical advances into action, too. Intel spent $11 billion on capital improvements last year, and almost all of these costs go toward building factories.

For a deeper look into the risks and benefits of running semiconductor factories, check out slides 14 through 23 of this handy slideshow.

Intel's dormant Fab 42 in Ocotillo, Arizona. Source: Intel.

How dangerous is this particular risk?
You can imagine the pain Intel feels when its market predictions go astray. For example, Intel added a new facility to its Arizona campus in 2011 and pumped $5 billion into equipping this state-of-the-art manufacturing line. But the new factory was supposed to churn out desktop and laptop chips, and the market for these products kind of died in 2012.

Now Intel has a fully built, but only partially equipped, factory in Arizona, collecting dust until its services are needed again. Five billion spent for no immediate return. This is the downside of long-term planning and leading the market.

Intel just announced that parts of the dying PC market might not be terminally ill after all. The company hasn't promised to restart Fab 42 in Arizona, but that's a possibility if these trends stay intact. So the Arizona adventure is an instructive example of how Intel's biggest, baddest risk factor actually plays out from time to time. The risks are real.

This week's PC sales reversal is also a useful companion piece, because it shows how some short-term problems don't last forever. Some analysts speculated that Intel might want to sell Fab 42 rather than sitting out this production-less period. It looks like Intel made the right decision, after all.

Leaked: A huge small-cap opportunity
This device -- kept secret until now -- could mark a new revolution in smart tech (with big implications for health care). It's a gigantic market opportunity -- ABI Research predicts 485 million of its type will be sold per year. Intel will certainly play a big role in this burgeoning market, but there's bigger money to be made in smaller and more-focused competitors. To learn about the small-cap stock making this device possible -- the stock that could mint millionaires left and right when its full market potential is realized -- click here.

Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 16, 2014, at 7:52 PM, mtechac wrote:

    Unluckily Intel is about to get hit with the second ARM wave.

    The first disruptive hit was the 32-bit ARM processors, the second one even bigger hit, is going to be the 64-bit ARM processors being built by Apple, Samsung, AMD, Qualcom, NVIDIA, TI, etc.

    The latter companies will be eroding the high-profit areas of Intel: 64-bit servers, workstations, laptops, etc. Intel market share in these areas are going to begin getting hit in the same way as the 32-bit ARM wave.

    Intel marketing is very good, but it can't fool the market forever.

    ARM companies like Apple, AMD, Samsung, NVIDIA, etc. are all putting nails in Intel's coffin, since Intel does not have the low-profit product business model to compete with these and other companies.

    Intel is just a laptop company, since they do not own any high-end GPU so no high-end machine can be built without NVIDIA or AMD high-end GPUs.. and it is not that Intel did not try to build a high end GPU, because they tried hard, but they failed miserably on their Larrabee project and they are too late for another try..

    64-bit ARM chips will significantly erode Intel profits over the next two years, and after that, who knows how Intel will fair out...

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2994063, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/30/2015 6:03:43 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Anders Bylund

Anders Bylund is a Foolish Technology and Entertainment Specialist. Where the two markets intersect, you'll find his wheelhouse. He has been an official Fool since 2006 but a jester all his life.

Hypoallergenic. Contains six flavors not found in nature. Believes in coyotes and time as an abstract.

Follow Anders on Twitter, LinkedIn, and Google+.

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 16,643.01 -11.76 -0.07%
S&P 500 1,988.87 1.21 0.06%
NASD 4,828.33 15.62 0.32%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

8/28/2015 4:00 PM
INTC $28.42 Up +0.70 +2.53%
Intel CAPS Rating: ****