This Might Be About As Good As It Gets

The job market might be about as good as it gets right now. 

That sounds crazy, with almost 10 million Americans unemployed and an unemployment rate of 6.3%, still well above normal.

And, to be clear, the economy could still grow for years to come. 

But dig into the characteristics of the unemployed, and there's an important trend that shows the jobs market is actually pretty strong already. 

The short-term unemployment rate, measuring those out of work for fewer than 14 weeks, is currently about 3%. That's near the lowest it's been in half a century. In fact, we went more than three decades, from 1968 to 2000, without short-term unemployment becoming as low as it is today:

If you lose your job today, the odds of finding a new job in the next month or two are about as good as they've ever been. Maybe you'll take a pay cut, or have to move, but there's a good chance you'll find work quickly. Short-term unemployment is lower today than it was for all of the 1990s, which we consider one of the most prosperous decades in history. 

There aren't many periods in history where short-term unemployment dropped much lower than it is right now. That’s important, because unemployment has a natural floor. If it gets too low, inflation rises, the Fed raises interest rates, the economy slows down, and unemployment goes back up. It's hard to know where that floor is, or if it's entirely tied to short-term unemployment. If history is any guide, though, we're near it.

But if things are so good, why is overall unemployment still so high? 

Long-term unemployment -- those out of work for more than six months -- is still incredibly high historically:

What’s dangerous about this is that those stuck in long-term unemployed may never recover.

“I'm concerned that people who have been without work for years will lose skills, lose hope, and lose contact with the labor market,” Justin Wolfers, an economist at the Brookings Institute told me in 2012. "If this were to happen, we could see a generation remain jobless for much of their lives."

There’s some evidence this is happening. According to Princeton economist Alan Krueger, only 22% of those who fell into long-term unemployment in 2008 had steady, full-time jobs by the first half of 2013. Another one-third stopped looking for work, and just under a third were working part time – that’s part of why the long-term unemployment rate has come down. Less than 15% of those who went into long-term unemployment in 2008 are currently looking for work.

The longer you remain out of work, the harder it is to regain employment. According to the Council of Economic Advisors, those unemployed for less than five weeks have a 31% chance of getting a job in the next month. At 27 weeks of unemployment, it's 12%. After a year out of work, it's just 9%.

Even when the long-term employed do get back to work, it’s usually a big, permanent step down from where they were before. Testifying before Congress in 2010, Till von Wachter of Columbia University explained: "The average mature worker losing a stable job at a good employer will see earnings reductions of 20% lasting over 15-20 years" when laid off during a recession. And then there's the stress. In deep recessions like we just had, losing your job can reduce life expectancy by as much as 1.5 years, von Wachter found.

So, short-term unemployment is great, maybe about as low as it will get. And those stuck in long-term unemployment are increasingly, day by day, less likely to ever recover.

Things are looking better for the economy now than they have in years. But before you get excited about how strong a recovery could be, keep in mind: For most of the economy, things are already pretty good. Maybe about as good as it gets.

Check back every Tuesday and Friday for Morgan Housel’s columns on finance and economics.

For more:

Free 30-day trial: The Motley Fool's flagship service
Tom and David Gardner founded The Motley Fool over 20 years ago with the goal of helping the world invest...better. Their flagship service, Stock Advisor, has helped thousands of investors take control of their financial lives and beat the market. Click here to sign up today.


Read/Post Comments (5) | Recommend This Article (24)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 20, 2014, at 1:20 PM, hbofbyu wrote:

    How does someone go from "unemployed" to "stopped looking for work"? Are they winning the lottery? Going on disability? Collecting welfare? Who is buying them food?

    The only thing that kind of makes sense is if they decide to reduce their standard of living and take an early retirement. I think there is something screwy with this statistic.

  • Report this Comment On June 20, 2014, at 9:04 PM, DavidDavis wrote:

    Many people don't to work, but the most don't like to do what the don't want to do - maybe here is the truly answer.

  • Report this Comment On June 23, 2014, at 12:10 PM, Eudemonic wrote:

    One can also go from "unemployed" to "stopped looking for work" by becoming self-employed. It happens all the time.

  • Report this Comment On June 24, 2014, at 5:58 AM, Mathman6577 wrote:

    It took this long to recover all of the jobs lost from the recession. Since the population and labor force have increased this means less employment. If this is the best we can do it's pretty bad. Things are not going well in the labor market no matter how the numbers are spinned.

  • Report this Comment On June 24, 2014, at 9:31 AM, randallw wrote:

    Skills, Skills, Skills. There are employers desperate to find qualified workers in certain fields. We don't have an unemployment problem, we have a re-education/skills problem.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2999346, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/23/2014 12:32:37 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement