Will General Electric Company Win a Duel With Siemens?

A look at why GE should avoid entering a bidding war with its German rival.

Jun 18, 2014 at 3:15PM

In the game of poker, a player is "on tilt" if he allows his emotions to cloud his otherwise better judgment. That's when big bets get blown. Right now, shareholders of General Electric (NYSE:GE) are hoping management's not on tilt in a high-stakes bidding war with Germany's Siemens.

On Monday, GE's rival teamed up with Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and submitted an attractive but complicated bid for France's Alstom. In theory, their joint offer opens the door for a counterstrike from GE. But will the American manufacturer take the bait? As the industrial heavyweights go toe to toe, let's look at how this duel could ultimately shake out.

Ge Vs Siemens

Source: Flickr/Jeffrey TurnerWikipedia.

GE's backdoor bid
For starters, we already know what GE brought to the table prior to this week. According to both Bloomberg and The Economist, GE's proposal found its way to Alstom's desk after months of negotiations that took place behind closed doors. The French government was none too pleased with the way it came to fruition, but GE attempted to offer something for everyone, bureaucrats included. Here are the four key components of GE's proposal:

  • GE would pay $16.9 billion ($13.5 billion net-of-cash) for Alstom's power business.
  • Alstom would keep its rail business, which could potentially be bolstered by the addition of GE's cash payment.
  • GE promised to add 1,000 French jobs over three years.
  • GE alluded to a fruitful working relationship with France, one that resembles its successful 40-year joint venture with France's jet engine maker Safran.

The first two elements provide Alstom with some relief at a time when overcapacity in the European turbine business has put a dent in earnings. The latter two, of course, were meant to be the icing on the cake as enticement for French officials.

In the days preceding the Siemens-Mitsubishi offer, GE seemed quite satisfied with its poker hand, from my perspective. But we all know that in gambling, the house always wins, and it seems more and more evident that the French government is the house.

Siemens strikes back (sort of)
Just prior to Siemens' joint offer with Mitsubishi, I suggested that the smart angle for these two companies would be to play up their willingness to cooperate with France and thereby reduce GE's political clout. Siemens was apparently poised to do just that, but it might have stretched all parties a little thin in the process.

The offer it rolled out to Alstom on Monday went over the top on General Electric, amounting to a $19.2 billion bid for the energy assets, which is roughly $2.3 billion beyond GE's proposal. Siemens and Mitsubishi's executives subsequently started to work the room in Paris, promising France's president, Francois Hollande, that they would provide 1,000 jobs and 1,000 apprenticeships should the merger gain acceptance and approval.

Fresh off a successful bid for the assets of Rolls-Royce Holdings, Siemens knows a thing or two about raising the stakes. And the German manufacturer's CEO, Joe Kaeser, was quick to state why Siemens and Mitsubishi should prevail: "Our offer is more attractive from a financial, industrial and political perspective [...] If you want to talk about a dismantling [of Alstom], you have to look at the other offer [from GE]."

The problem with this blanket statement from Siemens is twofold, however. First off, it hardly captures the nuances of a bidding duel taking place across continents. Further complicating this particular duel is the fact that French bureaucrats -- rather than the shareholders of the respective companies -- are positioned to tip the balance in one way or another.

Secondly, Kaeser's statement glosses over the caveat that a Siemens-Mitsubishi victory would result in a highly complicated dispersal of Alstom's assets. For example, should the Siemens-driven tie-up go through, the German conglomerate would wind up with Alstom's gas turbines business, whereas Mitsubishi (and its own partner, Hitachi) would take a minority stake with Alstom in its steam, grid, and hydro divisions. Market power and decision-making authority would hardly remain intact -- or in France for that matter -- and the deal suggests that Mitsubishi could acquire a 10% stake in Alstom from its current leading shareholder, the French conglomerate Bouygues. In the background, there's reason to believe that Bouygues would be perfectly satisfied with GE swooping in as a white knight.

It's not clear, in other words, whether Siemens and Mitsubishi look like a match made in heaven for Alstom or France, so GE's left wondering whether it still indeed holds the upper hand.

Will GE bring out the big guns?
Given what we know, GE seems uninterested in bolstering a $16.9 billion bid by reaching for its wallet. Instead, management could sweeten the deal for the political crowd by guaranteeing additional job growth in France, perhaps matching Siemens and Mitsubishi's promise of 2,000 additional employees. Beyond that, there's speculation about GE selling its train-signal business to Alstom as part of the overall exchange.

Chummy Ge Employees

What matters for GE and Alstom is merging cultures, not raising the price tag. Source: General Electric.

Shareholders of General Electric should hope that these mere token offerings are all that CEO Jeff Immelt and company put forth in the final hour. An "all-in" move that raises its bid could prove futile. France claims that it wants further cooperation in a potential alliance, but I suspect the concentration of industrial power, domestic jobs, and energy security take precedence. If that were the case, then GE's less complicated deal would likely be favorable, since merging two company cultures poses fewer issues than four. The odds of success, then, would be higher, presenting a win-win-win scenario for the three key parties involved. For now, GE can still win by playing its cards close to the chest and leaving its pocketbook in place.

Is GE a top dividend stock for the next decade?
The smartest investors know that dividend stocks simply crush their non-dividend paying counterparts over the long term. That's beyond dispute. They also know that a well-constructed dividend portfolio creates wealth steadily, while still allowing you to sleep like a baby. Knowing how valuable such a portfolio might be, our top analysts put together a report on a group of high-yielding stocks that should be in any income investor's portfolio. To see our free report on these stocks, just click here now.

Isaac Pino, CPA, owns shares of General Electric Company. The Motley Fool owns shares of General Electric Company. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

1 Key Step to Get Rich

Our mission at The Motley Fool is to help the world invest better. Whether that’s helping people overcome their fear of stocks all the way to offering clear and successful guidance on complicated-sounding options trades, we can help.

Feb 1, 2016 at 4:54PM

To be perfectly clear, this is not a get-rich action that my Foolish colleagues and I came up with. But we wouldn't argue with the approach.

A 2015 Business Insider article titled, "11 websites to bookmark if you want to get rich" rated The Motley Fool as the #1 place online to get smarter about investing.

"The Motley Fool aims to build a strong investment community, which it does by providing a variety of resources: the website, books, a newspaper column, a radio [show], and [newsletters]," wrote (the clearly insightful and talented) money reporter Kathleen Elkins. "This site has something for every type of investor, from basic lessons for beginners to investing commentary on mutual funds, stock sectors, and value for the more advanced."

Our mission at The Motley Fool is to help the world invest better, so it's nice to receive that kind of recognition. It lets us know we're doing our job.

Whether that's helping the entirely uninitiated overcome their fear of stocks all the way to offering clear and successful guidance on complicated-sounding options trades, we want to provide our readers with a boost to the next step on their journey to financial independence.

Articles and beyond

As Business Insider wrote, there are a number of resources available from the Fool for investors of all levels and styles.

In addition to the dozens of free articles we publish every day on our website, I want to highlight two must-see spots in your tour of fool.com.

For the beginning investor

Investing can seem like a Big Deal to those who have yet to buy their first stock. Many investment professionals try to infuse the conversation with jargon in order to deter individual investors from tackling it on their own (and to justify their often sky-high fees).

But the individual investor can beat the market. The real secret to investing is that it doesn't take tons of money, endless hours, or super-secret formulas that only experts possess.

That's why we created a best-selling guide that walks investors-to-be through everything they need to know to get started. And because we're so dedicated to our mission, we've made that available for free.

If you're just starting out (or want to help out someone who is), go to www.fool.com/beginners, drop in your email address, and you'll be able to instantly access the quick-read guide ... for free.

For the listener

Whether it's on the stationary exercise bike or during my daily commute, I spend a lot of time going nowhere. But I've found a way to make that time benefit me.

The Motley Fool offers five podcasts that I refer to as "binge-worthy financial information."

Motley Fool Money features a team of our analysts discussing the week's top business and investing stories, interviews, and an inside look at the stocks on our radar. It's also featured on several dozen radio stations across the country.

The hosts of Motley Fool Answers challenge the conventional wisdom on life's biggest financial issues to reveal what you really need to know to make smart money moves.

David Gardner, co-founder of The Motley Fool, is among the most respected and trusted sources on investing. And he's the host of Rule Breaker Investing, in which he shares his insights into today's most innovative and disruptive companies ... and how to profit from them.

Market Foolery is our daily look at stocks in the news, as well as the top business and investing stories.

And Industry Focus offers a deeper dive into a specific industry and the stories making headlines. Healthcare, technology, energy, consumer goods, and other industries take turns in the spotlight.

They're all informative, entertaining, and eminently listenable ... and I don't say that simply because the hosts all sit within a Nerf-gun shot of my desk. Rule Breaker Investing and Answers contain timeless advice, so you might want to go back to the beginning with those. The other three take their cues from the market, so you'll want to listen to the most recent first. All are available at www.fool.com/podcasts.

But wait, there's more

The book and the podcasts – both free ... both awesome – also come with an ongoing benefit. If you download the book, or if you enter your email address in the magical box at the podcasts page, you'll get ongoing market coverage sent straight to your inbox.

Investor Insights is valuable and enjoyable coverage of everything from macroeconomic events to investing strategies to our analyst's travels around the world to find the next big thing. Also free.

Get the book. Listen to a podcast. Sign up for Investor Insights. I'm not saying that any of those things will make you rich ... but Business Insider seems to think so.


Compare Brokers