NVIDIA's Latest Move Makes Sense

PCWorld reported that NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA  ) no longer plans to develop a processor for servers. This comes after NVIDIA's 2011 announcement of an ARM (NASDAQ: ARMH  ) compatible CPU core known as Project Denver. NVIDIA claimed the CPU was intended to extend the range of ARM systems upward to PCs, data center servers, and supercomputers.

However, today, it looks as though Project Denver -- along with any potential successors -- will be aimed at the "traditional" Tegra processor markets of tablets, automobiles, and so on.

NVIDIA initially wanted to sell HPC-oriented CPUs
From NVIDIA's initial Project Denver announcement, it seemed the company wanted to make a play at grabbing more content share in the high-performance computing market. The company already sells very high-performance accelerators (based on the same silicon as NVIDIA's consumer GPUs but with specialized firmware/drivers), which is a good, high-margin business.

However, grabbing the CPU/platform with its own host processors could have driven potentially meaningful incremental revenue for NVIDIA.

Intel (NASDAQ: INTC  ) has significant structural advantages in this market via its Xeon family of processors. Perhaps NVIDIA management did not feel comfortable sinking hundreds of millions of dollars to develop host processors for high-performance computing that could ultimately fail to generate the proper return on investment. 

Partnering with IBM and the ARM vendors makes sense
In a bid to diversify away from being attached solely to Intel systems in high-performance computing (Intel is trying to cut NVIDIA's GPUs out with its own Xeon Phi products), NVIDIA is partnering with IBM -- which sells POWER-architecture based systems -- and Applied Micro, a company making a play at bringing the ARM architecture to servers.

Source: NVIDIA via AnandTech. 

It's unclear whether the ARM vendors will make progress here (though IBM's POWER 8 looks very compelling as an alternative architecture), particularly as Intel's Xeon products are quite strong and enjoy both incumbency and a very large research and development budget. However, making sure its HPC-oriented GPU products are compatible with all potential solutions on the market seems like the correct business decision for NVIDIA. 

Foolish takeaway
Though it would have been interesting to see what sort of monster HPC-oriented host processor NVIDIA would have come up with, the economic realities of this market likely led the company to take a more "horizontal" approach. NVIDIA's HPC-oriented GPUs are the best in the world at what they do, and investing to make sure that they stay that way and attaching them to others' platforms seems like the right strategy for NVIDIA at this time.

Like buying NVIDIA in the 90's, this small tech stock could deliver monster returns
Apple recently recruited a secret-development "dream team" to guarantee its newest smart device was kept hidden from the public for as long as possible. But the secret is out, and some early viewers are claiming its everyday impact could trump the iPod, iPhone, and the iPad. In fact, ABI Research predicts 485 million of this type of device will be sold per year. But one small company makes Apple's gadget possible. And its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early in-the-know investors. To be one of them, and see Apple's newest smart gizmo, just click here!


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (3)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 23, 2014, at 5:41 PM, masterwallstreet wrote:

    In my opinion only, this article is a pretty decent and very informative article. I like this article I give you credit because it is interesting. This one part I really like Intel is trying to cut NVIDIA out with its own Xeon products. NVIDIA is partnering with IBM which sells power architectural based systems and applied micro a company making a play at bringing the ARM architecture system to servers. It seems like there is a war going on between NVIDIA and Intel. Intel is not playing fair with NVIDIA. Intel is not playing fair with AMD. Since NVIDIA is not in 64 bit ARM servers there is a lot less competition in this field now. AMD has an advantage because they are the only ones who could provide both 64 bit and 86 bit ARM server capabilities over the competition even over Intel.

  • Report this Comment On June 23, 2014, at 7:28 PM, TMFAeassa wrote:

    @ masterwallstreet

    Glad you liked it. Thanks for reading and the comment.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 3004220, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/23/2014 2:26:51 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement