AstraZeneca Gets a Chance to Prove Its Worth to Pfizer

A positive result at an FDA advisory committee for AstraZeneca's olaparib, which will compete with AbbVie's veliparib, could make the British company more attractive to Pfizer.

Jun 24, 2014 at 2:09PM

A company that rejects a buyout proposal with a 45% stock-price premium had better deliver on its case for being worth more than the offer.

AstraZeneca (NYSE:AZN) gets an early shot to prove its worth tomorrow when a Food and Drug Administration's advisory committee reviews its ovarian cancer drug olaparib. The British drugmaker cited the drug's potential as one reason why Pfizer's (NYSE:PFE) recent acquisition bids were too low.

Good data, but...
The olaparib data look good. Really good. The median progression-free survival for patients with tumors that have BRCA mutations was 11.2 months for those taking olaparib, compared to 4.1 months for the placebo arm. There's an 83% reduction in the risk of progression or death compared to placebo.Pfsolaparib

Source: FDA.

But as with most things is drug development, there's more than meets the eye.

The BRCA group was just a subset of the patients enrolled in the trial. The subgroup was pre-specified, so it's not like AstraZeneca data-mined to find it, but dividing the enrollment means the best data comes from just 96 patients. The FDA is worried that the small size might overemphasize the true magnitude of the effect, especially since the control arm fared worse than one might expect. There's also no statistically significant benefit to overall survival, which is obviously much more important than when the disease progresses, but the lack of statistical significance isn't too surprising given the small sample size.

Side effects
The FDA is quite lenient when it comes to side effects for oncology drugs, considering that most people would rather live longer with these health impacts than die. Serious adverse events occurred in 18.4% of patients taking olaparib, compared to 10.2% of patients in the placebo group, which doesn't look too bad.

The one concern comes from three patients (2.2% of those taking olaparib) who appear to have gotten myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia. If you combine all the trials to date, AstraZeneca said the rate of patients getting the blood cancers is just 0.8% of those taking olaparib, but the FDA is worried the incidence might be underreported if patients developed the secondary cancer after the study ended.

Good news tomorrow?
I think the advisory panel will recommend the FDA approve olaparib tomorrow. The data in the subgroup is so strong that the outside advisers won't be too worried about the side effects. And AstraZeneca is looking for an accelerated approval, so it'll be conditional on the drug passing on ongoing phase 3 trial anyway. The drug won't be on the market for too long before we figure out if there's an issue with the small sample size skewing the data.

The FDA may not see it that way. The agency, which has the final say, tends to be a little more conservative than its advisers. The flip side to "it won't be too long before we figure out if there's an issue" is "why not just wait for the phase 3 trial."

In the long run, an accelerated approval isn't that important for AstraZeneca sales. Either way, the phase 3 trial needs to be successful for the drug to reach and stay on the market; sales in the interim will be minimal compared to total sales over the life of the drug.

The biggest advantage to an accelerated approval is staying ahead of AbbVie (NYSE:ABBV), which has a drug, veliparib, in the same class. AbbVie posted promising phase 2 data in BRCA ovarian cancer patients with a progression-free survival of 8.1 months. While that doesn't look quite as good as olaparib, the veliparib trial did not feature a control group, so it's hard to compare the data. AbbVie appears to be going after breast cancer first, having started a phase 3 trial in breast cancer patients earlier this year, but it seems likely the two -- or perhaps AbbVie and Pfizer? -- will eventually compete for patients in ovarian and/or breast cancer, assuming both drugs are approved.

The first step is getting past the FDA advisory committee.

Success or not, it won't affect AstraZeneca's dividend
The smartest investors know that dividend stocks simply crush their non-dividend paying counterparts over the long term. That's beyond dispute. They also know that a well-constructed dividend portfolio creates wealth steadily, while still allowing you to sleep like a baby. Knowing how valuable such a portfolio might be, our top analysts put together a report on a group of high-yielding stocks that should be in any income investor's portfolio. To see our free report on these stocks, just click here now.

Brian Orelli and The Motley Fool have no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information