3 Reasons Gallup's Assault on Social Media Advertising is Terribly Misleading

A recent Gallup report concludes social media ads are ineffective. Here's why it's wrong.

Jun 25, 2014 at 8:05PM


Are social media ads on sites like Facebook and Twitter effective? Gallup doesn't think so. 

For businesses that want to expand their reach in the modern world, social media seems a logical place to start. But a new poll by research firm Gallup says these businesses are wasting their time.

In a new research report titled "The Myth of Social Media," Gallup begins by describing the perceived opportunity, noting that Facebook (NASDAQ:FB) users post 4.75 billion items of content each day. Meanwhile, Twitter (NYSE:TWTR) users on a daily basis send 400 million tweets, Instagram users "like" 1.2 billion photos, and YouTube viewers watch an incredible 4 billion videos. As a result, Gallup said U.S. companies just last year collectively spent $5.1 billion on social media advertising.

Gallup's argument sounds reasonable
However, Gallup said a whopping 62% of the 18,525 U.S. consumers it polled insisted social media has "no influence at all" on their purchasing decisions. By comparison, just 5% stated it has "a great deal of influence," 30% cited "some influence," and the remaining 3% weren't sure what to think.

The problem, Gallup said, is that "most consumers aren't visiting social media sites to engage with brands -- they are there to interact with people they know." Specifically, when asked their reasons for social media use, 94% answered "To connect with friends and family." By comparison, only 29% cited following trends or finding product reviews and information, and just 20% wanted to "comment on what's hot or new" or to write reviews of products.

That sounds fair enough. It is called "social" media, after all, and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has repeatedly outlined his ambitions of "connecting the world" through his platform. And, to our fickle market's dismay, those ambitions often come at the expense of near-term profitability.

Here's why it doesn't add up
However, a Facebook representative wasted little time chiming in with this: "The only thing this poll shows is that self reported behavioral data is unreliable. For decades, studies that look at people's actual, real-world behavior have shown that ads on all mediums, including social media, effect the things people buy."

I'm with Facebook on this one, and here are three reasons why:

1. Consumer, meet restraint bias
First, have you ever heard of restraint bias? It's the tendency to overestimate our ability to control impulsive behavior. Fellow Fool Morgan Housel touches on how restraint bias affects investors here. But whether consumers admit it or not, restraint bias also plays a huge role in advertising. And, as a collective group, we consumers tend to think we're much better at resisting the allure of advertisements than we really are.

2. Gallup's own generational data
Even so, have a look at this table, taken directly from Gallup's own report and titled "Influence of Social Media on Purchasing Decisions, by Generation."

 % No influence at all % Some influence % Great deal of influence 


43  7
Generation X  57  34 
Baby Boomers  68  26 
Traditionalists  75 16 

You might be tempted to respond to the data with a "Duh." But keeping in mind Gallup's 62% "no influence" stat, consider its broader implications. Gallup's poll only took into account consumers aged 18 and over, and there's a clear trend of younger consumers being more amiable to the effectiveness of social media ads.

This makes perfect sense considering these younger consumers are, by and large, much more comfortable than other groups with social media platforms. Compared to older generations, it's also no mystery that they comprise a larger percentage of the overall user base for burgeoning sites Facebook and Twitter. As today's youth age, it seems reasonable to assume their comfort in accepting social media as a viable ad medium will carry forward.

3. Improving ad platforms
Finally, consider that Gallup's poll was conducted from Dec. 12, 2012, to Jan. 22, 2013. Why does this matter? Because social media sites have gone to great lengths since then to continuously improve the effectiveness of their respective advertising platforms.

Twitter's "Tailored Audiences" product, for one, was only introduced in December 2013, and aims to drive better performance for advertisers by letting them target specific groups of existing and potential customers with more relevant ads.

To Gallup's credit, Facebook formally launched its own equivalent solution -- dubbed "Custom Audience" -- in September 2012, just a few months before Gallup's data collection efforts began. However, Facebook has revamped and expanded its Custom Audience tools several times since then, causing many big-name advertisers that had previously abandoned social media ads to dive back in.

Foolish takeaway
At first glance, Gallup's poll seems to frame a solid case against the effectiveness of social media advertising. But when you dig deeper into the holes created by consumers' own biases, Gallup's generational data, and the fact that social media platforms are continuously improving their advertising skills, the pollster's stated conclusion just doesn't hold water.

Warren Buffett: This new technology is a "real threat"
Social media isn't the only disruptive tech growing its influence. At the recent Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting, Warren Buffett admitted this emerging technology is threatening his biggest cash-cow. While Buffett shakes in his billionaire-boots, only a few investors are embracing this new market which experts say will be worth over $2 trillion. Find out how you can cash in on this technology before the crowd catches on, by jumping onto one company that could get you the biggest piece of the action. Click here to access a FREE investor alert on the company we're calling the "brains behind" the technology.

Steve Symington has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Facebook and Twitter. The Motley Fool owns shares of Facebook. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information