Is Samsung’s Shortfall Bad for Qualcomm?

A little while back, an analyst from BMO Capital Markets downgraded shares of Qualcomm (NASDAQ: QCOM  ) on checks suggesting that Samsung's (NASDAQOTH: SSNLF  ) smartphone shipments were falling a bit short for the quarter.

With Samsung's CFO having recently made a statement suggesting that the second quarter didn't go all that well, the question now becomes whether Samsung's weakness spills over to Qualcomm, for which Samsung is a large customer.

If it's share loss to Apple, then probably
One possible explanation for Samsung's shortfall is possible share loss to smartphone giant, Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL  ) . Note that while Apple is a large customer of Qualcomm's, there are two principal factors that would make share shifts from Samsung toward Apple at the high end unfavorable to Qualcomm:

  • Royalty per device is likely lower. Samsung manufactures its own handsets, and as a result it pays a percentage of the selling prices of those devices to distributors/carriers to Qualcomm. Apple, on the other hand, enjoys a licensing loophole in which the royalty is paid based on the price that Apple pays its manufacturing partners rather than the price that Apple sells the phones to the end users/carriers for. Put simply, the royalty rate for a high end Samsung phone is likely materially higher than that of a high end Apple phone. 
  • Chip content is lower. As detailed in my prior article, Samsung's flagship Galaxy S5 uses a lot of Qualcomm silicon content including integrated apps processor/baseband, transceiver, audio CODEC, envelope tracker, and power management IC. The iPhone 5s, in contrast, uses a discrete cellular baseband (not an integrated apps processor/baseband, which is likely more expensive) and an audio CODEC from Cirrus Logic. Qualcomm simply has more silicon inside of a flagship Samsung phone than a flagship Apple phone.

So, if it turns out that Apple is gaining share at the high end on Samsung, then Qualcomm could see a negative revenue impact. If Samsung is merely losing share to other Android vendors, then the situation is pretty neutral for Qualcomm as LG, HTC, and other high end players use similar silicon from Qualcomm.

If the high end device market is simply slowing down or seeing average selling price erosion, then Qualcomm gets hit on the royalty side of things (as these royalties are usually based on device selling price). It's a bit trickier to call on the chip side of things.

Low end phones are a source of strength, not weakness
Although the high end may be a weak-spot for Qualcomm, it is important to not underestimate the power of the low end in driving Qualcomm's business. The growth in low end 3G and the beginnings of the LTE ramp are at the expense of 2G devices that did not bear royalties. This means that while blended average selling prices for royalty calculations will go down, the sheer total number of units that bear royalty goes up.

On top of that, in the low end of the handset market, Qualcomm is well ahead with its LTE solutions, capturing about 80% share of LTE platform solutions among the China handset vendors with its Snapdragon 400 solution.

Keep in mind that despite the fact that the Snapdragon 400 is a lower end apps processor (and thus lower priced) than the Snapdragon 800 that goes in the high end, attach rates for other components like connectivity combo chips are very high for the apps processor vendor, driving potentially increased content share. The smartphone OEMs playing in the low end don't want to "mix and match" components -- they want the platform to be as cheap as possible since the competitive pressures are high and margins relatively thin.

The negative here is that while Qualcomm has a virtual monopoly on high end smartphone platforms, there is competition in the 3G market (MediaTek is a particularly fierce competitor)

Foolish bottom line
If Samsung's troubles are reflective of the overall smartphone market, then Qualcomm -- which is very dependent on the success of cellular devices -- will be negatively affected. Further, a mix shift from Samsung to Apple would also likely be a negative.

That said, Qualcomm is likely to see an offset to that as the low end of the market moves toward LTE, where Qualcomm would not only benefit on the licensing side of things (most LTE phones are LTE and 3G multimode so Qualcomm gets paid for its full suite of patents), but from the chip side of things as well considering its LTE modems are well ahead of those from competitors such as MediaTek and Marvell. 

Leaked: Apple's next smart device (warning, it may shock you)
Apple recently recruited a secret-development "dream team" to guarantee its newest smart device was kept hidden from the public for as long as possible. But the secret is out, and some early viewers are claiming its everyday impact could trump the iPod, iPhone, and the iPad. In fact, ABI Research predicts 485 million of this type of device will be sold per year. But one small company makes Apple's gadget possible. And its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early in-the-know investors. To be one of them, and see Apple's newest smart gizmo, just click here!


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (2)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 26, 2014, at 3:30 PM, keeperoftheq wrote:

    AMD provides the graphics and CPU for the PS4, Xbox One & the Wii U.

    AMD FY 2014 revenue estimates from analysts are way off and need to adjusted. On average AMD revenue is growing by over $300 million per quarter.

    Q1 2014 revenue was $390 more than Q1 2013

    Q2 2014 estimates are $270 million more than Q2 2013

    Q3 2014 estimates are $200 million more than Q3 2013

    Between Q1 2014 earnings and Q2 & Q3 estimates that comes to $860 million more than Q1-Q3 2013

    Yet FY 2014 estimates are only $300 million more than FY 2013

    When analysts adjust the FY 2014 upwards, AMD will be off to the races.

  • Report this Comment On June 27, 2014, at 6:28 AM, JeffreyHF wrote:

    I must have missed the many AMD references in this article. My bad.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 3008682, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/23/2014 4:49:06 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement