Is Tesla Motors Inc. Headed for a Massive Short Squeeze?


Prototype of Tesla Model X, to launch later in 2014. Source: Tesla Motors.

Tesla Motors (NASDAQ: TSLA  ) has lapped the market in 2014 -- 10 times over. The electric-car maven's shares have gained 55% year to date, while the S&P 500 only increased by 5.5%.

As the stock raced higher, many investors bet against Tesla. The company has never reported a quarter of positive GAAP earnings, has burned $93 million of free cash during the last year, and generally raises hackles all around the automobile industry it disrupts.

That's fine. Short sales are an important part of a healthy market. There's nothing wrong with making money if Tesla's big profits never materialize, or if the stock has been traded up to unsustainable prices, or anything else goes wrong with CEO Elon Musk's electric dreams.

But then there's this chart:


Data from Nasdaq.

As you can see, Tesla's short-sellers appear to be setting themselves up for a terrifying short squeeze. It's taking longer and longer to cover the existing short positions out of Tesla's average daily trading volumes.

Hold that thought for a minute. Let me just remind you that the auto industry is no stranger to enormous short squeezes.

The classic example is Volkswagen (NASDAQOTH: VLKAY  ) . At the end of October, 2008, fellow German automaker Porsche bought a controlling 74% stake in Volkswagen as part of a hostile takeover attempt. But 13% of the stock was sold short at the time, and less than 1% of Volkswagen shares changed hands in a regular trading day.

In a panic, Volkswagen's short sellers had to liquidate their positions very quickly. Share prices quadrupled overnight, making a few fortunes, and destroying others. For a couple of hours, Volkswagen had a $364 billion market cap, all thanks to this sudden reversal in shorting fortunes.

The next day, Volkswagen shares fell 40%, and things went back to normal. The short squeeze was over -- but what a hurricane it was!

So, is Tesla headed for a sudden jolt like Volkswagen's 2008 adventure? The chart above might suggest as much, as the "days to cover" metric is climbing through the roof.

Well, not so fast.

For one thing, six days to cover is not a huge number. The real heavyweights in the short-sales game often require a month or more of average trading before closing out their very large negative bets. Less than a week? Bah! That's nothing in the grand scheme of things.

For another, consider this chart:


Data from Nasdaq.

Yeah. Days to cover may have skyrocketed lately, increasing by 85% during the last three months; but the number of shares sold short decreased 4% to land at 24.6 million. The real driver of that first chart is a 48% drop in average daily trades.

Long story short, Tesla is not headed for a showdown at high noon with the short sellers. Sorry to disappoint the day traders out there, but that's the truth.

It's just that the overall trading interest in Tesla shares is falling quickly. That's actually fairly normal as the market heads into the lower-volume summer months, not to mention the lull before July's earnings season kickoff, and the industry-specific lack of new product announcements at this time of year.

There may be many reasons to buy Tesla stock right now, as I did a couple of weeks ago -- but gunning for a tremendous short-squeeze payday is not one of them.

Warren Buffett's worst auto nightmare (Hint: It's not Tesla)
A major technological shift is happening in the automotive industry. Most people are skeptical about its impact. Warren Buffett isn't one of them. He recently called it a "real threat" to one of his favorite businesses. An executive at Ford called the technology "fantastic." The beauty for investors is that there is an easy way to invest in this megatrend. Click here to access our exclusive report on this stock.


Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (6)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 26, 2014, at 3:06 PM, pondee619 wrote:

    "Is Tesla Motors Inc. Headed for a Massive Short Squeeze?"

    Apparently, the answer to the headline is no.

    Kinda feel lied to by the Headline. Bad enough that the conclusion, by the author who wrote the headline, is that there may not be a short squeeze, it certainly won't be "Massive". Poetic License in fine, but not in technical writing. Those perusing Headlines will be misled.

    One last item, whe the change, in absolute terms is small (two or three days) it is dishonest t hype the percent change. " ..increasing by 85% during the last three months." All the way to less than 7 days. Like saying short increased 100% in one week, (from one day to two). Misleading and dishonest.

    Do you really have to resort to this type of writing to gain your eyeballs?

  • Report this Comment On June 27, 2014, at 8:15 AM, FTownBryan wrote:

    I didn't feel misled by the headline. Nice article.

  • Report this Comment On June 27, 2014, at 11:28 AM, JackB125 wrote:

    No short squeeze. The HFT's with a complete view of the various trade books (even many "dark" pool books) and the ability to front-run most order types available to us mortals will simply churn a small amount of stock until the shorts are covered. They will, of course, NOT be holding any stock at the end of the day -- that's not how they work. No investments allowed. You can lose $ with an investment. It's much better just to lobby Congress for arcane trading rules that they can use with zero risk. All perfectly legal -- and immoral.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 3008360, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/26/2014 4:23:49 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement