If You Want Decent Long-Term Care, Stay Away From These States

As baby boomers age, concerns regarding retirement are dwarfed only by worries about long-term health care during their later years. How can you know, for example, how your state ranks in this very important corner of the health care industry?

Wonder no more. The AARP Public Policy Institute, along with the SCAN Foundation and the Commonwealth Fund, has just published its Raising Expectations, 2014: A State Scorecard on Long-Term Services and Supports for Older Adults, People with Physical Disabilities, and Family Caregivers.

Based upon benchmarks first promulgated in 2011, the report rates each state and the District of Columbia according to five performance categories:

  • Affordability and access
  • Choice of setting and provider
  • Quality of life and quality of care
  • Support for family caregivers
  • Effective transitions

At the bottom of the heap lie Kentucky and Alabama, with Mississippi, Tennessee, Indiana and West Virginia close behind. The only state to be top-rated in all classifications is Minnesota.

Affordability still a problem everywhere
One issue that continues to affect each state is the fact that long-term care is expensive, outstripping the resources of middle-income families. Even in the highest-ranked states, this is an ongoing problem, according to the report.

Nursing home care is the most costly, gobbling up 246% of older households' median income per year. Home health care is much less expensive, but still consumes 84% of annual median income.

In addition, the study found that very few Americans have long-term care insurance, with only 10% of those aged 50 or older holding such a policy.

Why these 6 states are ranked so low
If affordability is a problem all over the country, why do the aforementioned six states get such lousy overall scores? Because each state's overall performance is compared to the median of all states, as well the best-ranked state, on 26 particular metrics.

For example, though Minnesota was the top-ranked state overall, it came in 49th in one of the cost metrics, median annual home care private pay cost as a percentage of median household income for those aged 65 years and older, due to its high costs. The No. 1 state in that specific category, the District of Columbia, was tops with only 47%, while Minnesota came in with 100% -- meaning that its costs would eat up every last cent of an elder's median annual income.

The Scorecard's interactive features allows you to compare each state to others, as well as view individual score sheets that can give you an enlightening snapshot of how each of these states are performing in the long-term care arena – as well as insights into how each state "earned" its own ranking. If you are a boomer who wants to plan ahead for your long-term health care, this study is worth its weight in gold.

How to get more income during retirement
Social Security plays a key role in your financial security, but it's not the only way to boost your retirement income. In our brand-new free report, our retirement experts give their insight on a simple strategy to take advantage of a little-known IRS rule that can help ensure a more comfortable retirement for you and your family. Click here to get your copy today.


Read/Post Comments (4) | Recommend This Article (26)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 29, 2014, at 11:32 PM, emailnodata wrote:

    Liberal states at the top, Conservative at the bottom.

    Big surprise.

  • Report this Comment On June 30, 2014, at 1:35 PM, 4pepper wrote:

    It looks like high tax states at the top. Low tax states lower. Start saving now.

  • Report this Comment On June 30, 2014, at 10:16 PM, jtlampert wrote:

    emailnodata - How is this related to politics? All liberal cities have higher crime rates than conservative rural america. Big Surprise.

    What is your point? Is it that liberal like to spend other peoples money and conservatives think you should take care of yourself?

  • Report this Comment On July 02, 2014, at 1:00 AM, KarenLorenzo wrote:

    The commitment of Minnesota's lawmakers made it possible to have an accessible and more improved long-term care support and services. While other states are struggling to enhance government long-term care services, they do not allocate funds for those projects and enactment.

    Too often, people do not have any kind of protection against long-term care. One way financing future long-term care cost is through long-term care insurance as discussed in infolongtermcareorg, however, majority of Americans prefer relying on medicare and medicaid. After all, why would you buy a product which is being offered for free. If you haven't started planning for long-term care, you might as well consider relocating to those states who excel in providing long-term care supports and services.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 3009265, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/27/2014 1:52:45 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement