Intel Corporation Gets Back to Tradition With Skylake

Intel (NASDAQ: INTC  )  is widely known to have slipped from its traditional tick-tock product release cadence. For those of you unfamiliar with tick tock, the idea is that each year, Intel releases either a fundamentally new processor design on a proven manufacturing technology or brings a familiar design to a brand new manufacturing technology.

This has proven a very effective means of managing risk for the world's largest chipmaker by revenue, but as of late Intel has fallen off of that traditional schedule. It seems that with its 2015 "tock" product, Intel is trying to get back on this cadence.

The historical pattern explained
Here's a recap of Intel's recent processor launches:

  • Jan. 7, 2010: Intel launches the 32-nanometer shrink of Nehalem known as Westmere.
  • Jan. 3, 2011: Intel launches Sandy Bridge, the first new architecture on the 32-nanometer node. 
  • April 29, 2012: Intel launches a 22-nanometer shrink of Sandy Bridge known as Ivy Bridge (note that high volume manufacturing began in the third quarter of 2011).
  • June 4, 2013: Intel launches the first ground up design on 22-nanometers known as Haswell.
  • September/October, 2014: Intel is set to launch the 14-nanometer shrink of Haswell known as Broadwell.

Source: Intel. 

The move from Westmere to Sandy Bridge was flawless, but there was a slight hiccup in the transition from Sandy Bridge to Ivy Bridge, and then another in shifting from Ivy Bridge to Haswell. It is unclear if the Ivy Bridge and Haswell slips were due to technical issues or simply inventory management or demand problems.

By Broadwell, the slips had piled up
With Broadwell, Intel suffered production issues. The 14-nanometer processor wasn't yielding well enough to be commercially viable at Intel's desired gross margin levels, leading the company to delay volume production. 

Intel is very sensitive about its gross margins, and given that the chipmaker lacks any meaningful competition from Advanced Micro Devices (NYSE: AMD  ) in the PC space, it could afford to keep the fight going with the current Haswell products until Broadwell was ready to go at high yields (in a more competitive environment, Intel may have chosen to take a gross margin hit). That said, too many of these slips could open a nice window of opportunity for AMD.

Broadwell delay doesn't push Skylake
In October 2013, an analyst asked Intel CEO Brian Krzanich if the Broadwell delay would delay Skylake. Krzanich, surprisingly enough, said the Broadwell delay would not push Skylake out. Seemingly confirming this is a recently leaked Intel road map slide:

Source: VR-Zone (Chinese Edition).

As you can see, Intel plans to launch Skylake for mainstream and premium desktops during the second quarter of 2015, less than a year after the first Broadwell systems will hit the market.

While it's unclear what the road map will look like for Skylake for notebooks and convertibles, it may not be aggressive since Intel seems to be just outright skipping Broadwell for the majority of its mainstream and premium desktop products but is bringing Broadwell to mobile. 

Why did Intel do this?
In its core PC space, Intel must ensure that it maintains and grows its market segment share, as the long-term secular trends in personal computers remain uncertain. While AMD may be down, Intel still needs to take its rival seriously. Despite AMD's multiyear weakness in PC CPUs, a company with essentially nothing to lose will move aggressively, particularly if it senses that its larger rival has become complacent.

Additionally, as mobile system-on-chip products add additional functionality like HEVC/H.265 video encoding/decoding, Intel must keep pace in adding this functionality on the PC side of things to stay competitive on features and efficiency. The Gen. 8 graphics block inside Broadwell doesn't seem to include some of these key features, so bringing Skylake's much-improved (from a media standpoint, anyway) graphics block should be a key priority.

Foolish takeaway
Returning to its tick-tock cadence by pulling in Skylake would be absolutely fantastic for Intel. Though Intel's competitive problems are in tablets and phones, and not in the PC space, it needs to sufficiently advance the PC platforms in order to maintain a sizable performance and feature delta against the quickly improving mobile products.

Like owning Intel in 1993, this small technology company has nearly unlimited room to run
Apple recently recruited a secret-development "dream team" to guarantee its newest smart device was kept hidden from the public for as long as possible. But the secret is out, and some early viewers are claiming its everyday impact could trump the iPod, iPhone, and the iPad. In fact, ABI Research predicts 485 million of this type of device will be sold per year. But one small company makes Apple's gadget possible. And its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early in-the-know investors. To be one of them, and see Apple's newest smart gizmo, just click here!

 


Read/Post Comments (6) | Recommend This Article (3)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 03, 2014, at 1:56 PM, mtechac wrote:

    Great news..!! Though, you don't want Intel to continue losing money by paying their customers to use expensive hardware. The research, the process, and the facilities cost billions to build and maintain. APPLE already builds its own ARM chips so their Intel dependency is shrinking fast and may disappear in the future. Many other Intel customers have their own ARM chips now, so who will be buying all these chips in massive volumes so that Intel can even maintain its profits..?

    Few people buy overpriced hardware these days. Hopefully, Intel can survive with low-profit product margins in the same way the ARM community and AMD do..

  • Report this Comment On July 03, 2014, at 2:20 PM, TEBuddy wrote:

    Perhaps you could incorporate a few more slights towards AMD. It is traditional AE style.

    I love it, Intel slowing down because there is less competition. That is traditional Intel, delay global progress to pad its pockets.

  • Report this Comment On July 03, 2014, at 3:35 PM, guest1 wrote:

    @mtechac going to 14 nm and below INTC won't take much of a margin hit if any. It's those fabs that will since they are willing to go into production with horrible yields such as TSM producing 20 nm A8 chips for apple at 55% ish yields. INTC would never do that.

    @TEBuddy Since there are juicy margins there you and a few of your best buddies can just buy some equipment and build a fab to compete with INTC and force that greedy company to speed up their launches!

  • Report this Comment On July 03, 2014, at 4:15 PM, ta152h wrote:

    Ashraf,

    Intel has not done a ground up redesign since the first Atom. Haswell is certainly not, it's a derivation of Ivy Bridge.

    Sandy Bridge was a pretty extensive redesign, but even it wasn't from the ground up.

    Why would you expect a delay for Skylake? You almost sound surprised it wasn't. It's just a redesign, so any flaws with the manufacturing yields wouldn't matter, since they'd be resolved by then.

    This isn't a serial thing. Broadwell is being worked on by an entirely different team. Not only that, the design was probably finalized a long time ago, so it would be more surprising if Skylake was delayed by any significant amount.

    However, what follows Skylake could be, as improving manufacturing lithographies is getting more and more difficult, which this delay does show.

    Intel will not have any meaningful competition above the lower-end processors. IBM will continue to destroy them at the high-end, but that's not a huge market (margins sure are high though), and above the Puma market, there's no real competition for the next few years. I just don't see Excavator changing anything fundamentally, or they wouldn't be discontinuing it.

    2016 will be interesting though. If Intel slips on their manufacturing, and the K12 and associated x86 product are solid products, an noticeable shift in the market could occur. It's a lot of ifs, but it's possible. Before 2016, Haswell and what follows it should continue to take what they want where they want. It's only a question margins versus market share.

  • Report this Comment On July 03, 2014, at 8:13 PM, TEBuddy wrote:

    guest1, thats what AMD did in the late 90s, who drove the pace of innovation around the world.

  • Report this Comment On July 04, 2014, at 3:04 PM, raghu78 wrote:

    Ashraf

    Looks like desktop broadwell k shipping in Q3 2015

    http://chinese.vr-zone.com/120198/intel-14nm-broadwell-will-...

    http://wccftech.com/intel-broadwell-processors-delayed-arriv...

    You seriously expect Skylake to ship before Broadwell for desktop. Skylake is looking more like a late 2015 or even early 2016 event.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 3016963, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/30/2014 12:18:49 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement