The Scary Supplier Practices of Apple and Samsung

Both Apple  (NASDAQ: AAPL  ) and Samsung  (NASDAQOTH: SSNLF  ) release a sustainability report that trumpets their social and ecological progress. While both are improving their suppliers' practices, each tends to encounter the same repeated issues. The latest reports detail continued poor labor practices. Just what kind, and will these issues ever materially affect the companies or investors?

Source: 2014 Samsung Sustainability Report.

Issues in detail
The above list comes from Samsung's own on-site surveys of 200 Chinese suppliers. While the results of the survey were only reported with these numbers and no specifics, Samsung also published findings from a third-party audit, which goes into greater detail.

Out of 100 Samsung suppliers:

  • 48 had minors involved with chemical handling processes.
  • 59 failed to provide safety gear like gloves, ear plugs, goggles, or masks.
  • A majority (no exact number given) don't comply with China's legally permitted overtime hours.
  • Nine discriminated based on either age, gender, or pregnancy in contracts or recruiting notices.
  • 33 omitted working conditions from contracts or did not provide contracts to temporary workers.
  • 33 delayed providing social insurance to workers.
  • 39 paid only a fixed wage to part-time workers without providing pay for overtime hours. 
  • 33 instituted fines or cut pay as a disciplinary action.
  • "Some" did not have emergency exits or working smoke alarms.
  • 33 didn't properly monitor sewage.
  • 35 failed to control air pollution from manufacturing. 

To give credit, Samsung did actually publish these findings instead of hiding them and, more importantly, corrected each issue that it found. But Samsung isn't alone, as Apple faces many of the same issues.

In the audit of 451 Apple suppliers:

  • Four conducted pregnancy testing, which Apple classifies as discrimination.
  • 105 failed to provide workers with social insurance.
  • 71 incorrectly calculated and underpaid overtime work.
  • Eight were found to have underage labor.
  • 209 lacked proper approval for fire safety, construction, or lightning regulations.
  • 90 failed to provide safety gear like gloves, ear plugs, goggles, or masks.
  • 159 did not have proper hazardous waste storage.

Apple addressed and corrected each issue that it found as well.

Workers in Shanghai eat lunch. Source: Apple Supplier Responsibility 2014 Progress Report.

Potential effects
These findings are nothing new, and it seems even when widely reported on, as in 2012 with Apple and supplier Foxconn, customers just don't care. And since customers don't care, investors don't care, at least concerning the top line of the income statement.

But what about increased costs? As Apple and Samsung demand fair practices from their suppliers, the latter might face higher expenses to actually install smoke detectors and pay overtime. For example, after Foxconn's undesirable attention in late 2011, it bumped factory worker salaries by 16% to 25%, and surely some of that must have increased the cost of putting together an iPhone. But looking at the iPhone numbers specifically, labor is one of the smallest costs.

Analyst Horace Dediu broke down iPhone costs in 2012, and estimated labor costs to be between 2% and 5% of the retail price. While increasing labor costs would nibble into margins, it's easy for Apple (with net margins around 22%) to stomach. Additionally, industry trends mean that both companies can take on higher labor costs. First, the cost of materials to build phones is dropping: One analyst puts the bill of materials for a Samsung Galaxy S5 between 10% and 15% less than an S4. Second, as the phone maker targets growth at lower price points, like with the iPhone 5c, it's expected that margin percentages may fall as earnings rise.

Improving, slowly
Apple began auditing its suppliers in 2006 and conducted 173 first-time audits last year. As these companies expand both their production relationships and auditing programs, working conditions will continue to improve. And while customers never seem to care, investors can at least shrug off any worry of increased expenses of such programs given how little labor factors into cost and where the industry is headed.

What does Apple have its suppliers working on now?
Apple recently recruited a secret-development Dream Team to guarantee its newest smart device was kept hidden from the public for as long as possible. But the secret is out... and some early viewers are even claiming its everyday impact could trump the iPod, iPhone, AND the iPad. In fact, ABI Research predicts 485 million of these type of devices will be sold per year. But one small company makes this gadget possible. And its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early in-the-know investors. To be one of them, and see Apple's newest smart gizmo, just click here!


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 06, 2014, at 2:23 AM, marv08 wrote:

    "These findings are nothing new, and it seems even when widely reported on, as in 2012 with Apple and supplier Foxconn, customers just don't care."

    Well, you do realise the irony ("sarcasm" might be the better word here) of making this statement on an investment related site?

    It was investors who were never satisfied with any reasonable margin or growth, and they forced each and every business into destroying "first-world" labor and moving to the cheapest places imaginable. Every single car, every single appliance, most clothing (including "premium" stuff) no matter if assembled in the US, Europe, South America or Asia itself is today unobtainable without at least a significant amount of parts from those suppliers; customers can't buy anything without them, except for maybe some good-guy-eco-stuff at unaffordable prices.

    Blaming consumers for the insatiable greed of others is perverted. It is not even 3% of the Western population cashing in, the rest is left without means and choices. Calling out Apple and Samsung when just about everybody is doing exactly the same is hypocrite BS.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 3015907, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/24/2014 4:49:16 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement