Why Isn't the WWE Network Working?

The WWE Network is a big gamble, but will it pay off?

Jul 5, 2014 at 6:59AM

I confess, I enjoy World Wrestling Entertainment (NYSE:WWE). And if you're here, you probably like it too. You have to admire the passion the company instills in its fan base, who turn out in droves to watch their favorite Superstars do their thing. 

These folks will pay up for T-shirts, hats, championship belts, and beer, just to get more from their experience. With over 350 million fans, the trending announcements on Twitter, and a seemingly endless supply of new and original content, at $9.99 per month, the WWE Network should be a no-brainer.

So why isn't it? Why have only 670,000 taken the plunge? The content is solid, the popularity is there: So where are the subs?


Source: YCharts.

Have we seen this before?
For some perspective, let's look at Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX). It you watch the broadcasts, the WWE network claims to be like Netflix only better. While that may be, the numbers don't support that claim. Netflix has a member base of over 48 million -- that's 72 times more than the WWE Network by its last count.

And that's OK. Netflix is a dominant force that has disrupted one industry and is working on disrupting another. But when it first started, it had a similar subscriber count as the WWE Network. Fast forward 10 years and Netflix has grown to more than $1 billion in quarterly streaming revenue.

Now, I'm not saying the WWE Network will grow up to be a Netflix-type juggernaut. But I am saying the precedent is there, the content is a great value, and there are enough fans to push the WWE Network way past where it is right now. For those interested in the rise of Netflix, perhaps you might find World Wrestling Entertainment interesting.

It's bigger than you think
World Wrestling Entertainment is popular ... strike that, it's very popular. From its recent investor presentation; it has the number 1 cable program, 350 million social media followers, is in 150+ countries, and has 2.6 billion YouTube views. All that adds up to a top 10 social media brand, according to the Dachis Group Social Business Index.

According to Nielson Media Research, average prime time views totaled 4.6 million for its flagship show Monday Night Raw. For perspective that was double the amount that watched ESPN. And its content is rich -- the company executes over 300 live events per year, it has 130,000 hours in its library, and it adds 500 hours or original programming to its lineup per year. If content is king, World Wrestling Entertainment produces plenty of it.


Source: wikicommons.

According to a recent WWE investor presentation, there are 116 million TV watching homes in the U.S. and 54 million of them don't care about the product. Well, that means that 53% or 62 million homes have some sort of love for sports entertainment. WWE estimates that 13 million are passionate about the company. 

By last count the Network has 670,000 subscribers, so its growth potential is significant. Let's say a portion of its 13 million passionate fans eventually buy the Network. Management has stated that it needs 1.3 million to 1.4 million subscribers to break even. That means it needs to double its current count, or harvest just 10% of its passionate fan base, to make up for what it's losing in its pay per view business. Anything more than that, and we're talking about some serious outperformance.

Judging by the recent collapse of the stock, many believe that the WWE Network will never make money. Those same pundits probably think the acting is equal to a bunch of bad one-liners from a Michael Bay movie. They also complain that the action is staged. And frankly, I would have to say they're mostly right.

Except for Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson, the performers are not great actors and the dialogue can get a bit goofy. But one thing the WWE does very well is put on a good show. Fans are aware that everything is bologna, yet they gobble the stuff up anyway. WWE no longer hides the fact that it is an entertainment company. 

Once you get past that, you can start to appreciate the performances. It is 100% original and the WWE is the only one who does it well. Other wrestling organizations pale in comparison. The UFC is considered by many to be a sport, which makes it more of a threat to boxing than an entertainment company. 

Foolish final words
So with all these data points, I think the only reason why the WWE Network isn't working is that it's only been around for a few months. I believe it needs time to push its platform. Time to work out the kinks, time to tap into just 10% of that passionate fan base.

With time, I think the WWE Network will be a major success. There are too many fans, there is too much content, and the value is just too good for it to fail. Ultimately, Vince McMahon may be thought of as a pioneer. If successful, the WWE may be the first of many companies that create a network so that customers can buy what they want, when they want.

Your cable company is scared, but you can get rich
You know cable's going away. But do you know how to profit? There's $2.2 trillion out there to be had. Currently, cable grabs a big piece of it. That won't last. And when cable falters, three companies are poised to benefit. Click here for their names. Hint: They're not Netflix, Google, and Apple. 


Wade Michels has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Netflix. The Motley Fool owns shares of Netflix. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information