Why Shareholders Should Be Patient With Bank of America Corp

This year's stress test wasn't just a head-ache for Citigroup. It also created more stress for Bank of America (NYSE: BAC  ) , leading to halted dividends and share buybacks, and has held Bank of America's share price back.

In this episode of The Motley Fool's Where the Money Is, Motley Fool financial analysts David Hanson and Tyler Riggs shed light on the ways in which Bank of America's actions following the discovery of an accounting error could pioneer a culture of self-reporting in the banking industry.

Although the error may have lowered the company's share price in the short-term, this could be an encouraging sign for Bank of America in the long-term. But what's the incentive for banks to self-report errors to the Fed if headlined events ultimately diminish shareholder trust and destroy value?

You don't have to receive Fed-approval for these dividends
The smartest investors know that dividend stocks simply crush their non-dividend paying counterparts over the long term. That’s beyond dispute. They also know that a well-constructed dividend portfolio creates wealth steadily, while still allowing you to sleep like a baby. Knowing how valuable such a portfolio might be, our top analysts put together a report on a group of high-yielding stocks that should be in any income investor’s portfolio. To see our free report on these stocks, just click here now.


Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (3)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 07, 2014, at 8:28 AM, funfundvierzig wrote:

    Long-suffering BAC shareholders have been patient for 8 years since the stock hit a peak of 55, and has lost over 70% of its value since, thanks to colossal malmanagement. …funfun..

  • Report this Comment On July 08, 2014, at 12:58 AM, sluggo47 wrote:

    Spoken like a true short and not a real investor Mr. Fun Fun. Obviously you were one of the poor investors that lost that 70%. Go long now and recoup some of your losses.

  • Report this Comment On July 08, 2014, at 7:27 AM, funfundvierzig wrote:

    Readers and fellow Fools, as you can see in this thread vindictive supporters and surrogates of Bank of America Management keep up their drumbeat of off-topic, distracting personal attacks on independently-speaking investors who dare to question the quality and performance of Bank of America leadership.

    Their unprofessional misconduct over the internet is a waving Red Flag for investors. What is being hidden and covered-up in this historically fraud-infested Bank that investors cannot discuss candidly and openly without personal harassment and threats?

    Disclosure: The undersigned has no position in BAC currently, neither short nor long. Nor have we ever lost money on a trading or investing position in BAC.

    funfundvierzig...funfun..

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 3017664, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/1/2014 12:07:26 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement