Here's Why Pfizer Should Buy GlaxoSmithKline

The same benefits Pfizer wanted out of AstraZeneca--a boosted pipeline and international exposure--could be had from Glaxo, along with a strong consumer franchise that Pfizer lacks.

Jul 8, 2014 at 9:00AM

In the aftermath of pharmaceutical giant Pfizer (NYSE:PFE) failing in its repeated attempts to acquire European drug maker AstraZeneca (NYSE:AZN), investors may be wondering what's next. After all, Pfizer's enormous offer and seeming willingness to pay quite a premium to no avail has left a bit of egg on management's face.

In its post-Lipitor era, organic growth has been hard to come by. And, since taking new drugs all the way to market is an extremely costly and time-consuming effort, management probably feels the easiest way to get the growth it needs now is by buying up a rival company.

Now that Pfizer has been rejected by AstraZeneca, it would be a mistake for the company to end its pursuits. The fundamental challenges facing the company, namely its severe patent losses, still remain. Since AstraZeneca is now off the table, Pfizer should bid for another U.K.-based pharmaceutical giant: GlaxoSmithKline (NYSE:GSK).

Going abroad for growth
To try to reenergize growth in its pipeline and in new overseas markets, Pfizer made several offers for AstraZeneca. AstraZeneca wouldn't budge, and now Pfizer is left by its lonesome.

Pfizer still faces tough patent expirations that continue to drag down the company's financial performance. Pfizer is enduring expiration on collaboration agreements of other key drugs, including Enbrel in the United States and Canada, as well as Spiriva in certain countries, and multi-source generic competition for Detrol LA, that are weighing on the top and bottom lines.

It's because of ongoing expirations that Pfizer's revenue fell 9%, or $1.1 billion, last quarter. This was due primarily to a 10% drop in its established pharmaceutical segment. Meanwhile, earnings per share fell 5% in the quarter.

GlaxoSmithKline can answer many of Pfizer's key questions. Glaxo is doing very well in emerging markets. Its pharmaceuticals and vaccines segment posted 2% sales growth in emerging markets and 13% sales growth in Japan last quarter.

In addition, Glaxo has a robust pipeline in some exciting new areas of therapy. For example, its HIV sales rose 4% last quarter thanks to the recent launch of integrase inhibitor Tivicay. In all, Glaxo holds 40 new molecular entities in either phase 2 or 3 clinical development.

However, it's worth noting Glaxo faces its own challenges. Sales in its pharmaceuticals and vaccines segment fell 10% in the U.S., mostly because of generic competition to its key drug Advair. Advair sales fell 30%, which matters a lot since it makes up about 30% of its respiratory sales.

At the same time, Glaxo is counting on recently launched COPD treatments Breo and Anoro take up some of the slack in its respiratory portfolio.

The vaccine portfolio will be helped greatly since Glaxo purchased the global vaccines business of Novartis earlier this year for $5.25 billion. The transaction is expected to be immediately accretive to Glaxo's EPS. In particular, Glaxo management is excited about the meningitis drug Bexsero.

Glaxo also has a strong consumer business, led by popular brands such as Aquafresh, Nicorette, and Tums. Pfizer doesn't have much of a consumer business to speak of, since it derived just 6% of its sales from consumer health care last quarter.

What Glaxo can offer Pfizer right now is clear. Pfizer expects full-year revenue to decline as much as 5% and flat earnings, while Glaxo projects modest sales growth and 6% earnings growth.

The Foolish bottom line
In summary, many of the same benefits Pfizer sought from AstraZeneca, including a favorable tax structure and a rebuilt pipeline, could be had with Glaxo as well. In addition, Pfizer would also receive the benefit of an expanded consumer health care business, which it currently doesn't have. It seems that Pfizer management intends on shifting the company toward being a nearly pure-play on pharmaceuticals, but that could be a double-edged sword.

The potential for blockbusters is compelling, but it's also a riskier pursuit than some of the diversified health care companies. Bringing Glaxo's established consumer brands and vaccine segments in might not seem sexy, but they would provide a valuable dose of consistency to Pfizer's financial performance, which has been fairly volatile over the past several quarters.

But why worry about Glaxo and Astra when there is an even bigger opportunity?
The best investors consistently reap gigantic profits by recognizing true potential earlier and more accurately than anyone else. Let me cut right to the chase. There is a product in development that will revolutionize not just how we treat a common chronic illness, but potentially the entire health industry. Analysts are already licking their chops at the sales potential. In order to outsmart Wall Street and realize multi-bagger returns you will need The Motley Fool’s new free report on the dream-team responsible for this game-changing blockbuster. CLICK HERE NOW.

Bob Ciura has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information