Why Apple’s iWatch Will Crush the Cheaper Competition

Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL  ) recently hired Patrick Pruniaux, VP of Sales and Retail for LVMH's high-end TAG Heuer Swiss watches. Pruniaux is Apple's third major hire from a luxury retailer over the past year. Last July, Apple hired Yves Saint Laurent CEO Paul Deneve as a vice president. Last October, it hired Burberry CEO Angela Ahrendts as its retail chief.

Source: Wikimedia Commons.

The hiring of this "luxury triumvirate" strongly suggests that Apple's iWatch -- currently rumored to be on track for an October launch -- could be far more expensive than current smartwatches. While it may seem risky to launch a high-end smartwatch into a sea of cheaper ones, it's actually a solid approach that could make the iWatch every bit as disruptive as the iPod, iPhone, or iPad.

The business of luxury
Apple has traditionally ignored the low-end market due to its lower margins. Steve Jobs famously compared Apple to BMW and Mercedes to illustrate the point that margins and reputation matter more than market share.

Apple's aim has always been to dominate the high-end market. The iPhone 5s costs $649 to $849 without a contract. Its only real competitor in that price range is Samsung's (NASDAQOTH: SSNLF  ) Galaxy S5. Yet Apple still comfortably dominates the U.S. smartphone market with a 42% market share compared to Samsung's 27%, according to comScore mobiLens.

That's why launching the iPhone 5c was a mistake. The colorful plastic 5c was only slightly cheaper than the 5s at $549 to $649, but it was doomed by its reputation as the "poor man's iPhone." The problem is that Apple listened to Wall Street analysts, who were convinced that Apple needed a low-end device to compete against cheaper Android devices, instead of following its instinct to maintain the "BMW and Mercedes" path that Jobs had set the company on. The 5c wasn't a complete bomb, but it was a pointless device that cannibalized 5s sales instead of converting Android users.

Let's not do that again. Source: Apple.

According to research firm Forrester, iPhone users in the U.S. have an average household income of $105,200, compared to an average household income of $89,300 for Android users. The same trend can be seen in Mac sales -- the average household income of Mac owners is $98,560, compared to $74,452 for PC owners.

Considering how well Apple's market share has held up, its popularity among affluent customers, and the lackluster reception of the 5c, it makes sense to launch the iWatch at a higher price than the $150 to $300 price of Samsung's Galaxy Gear watches.

The business of delayed disruption
Yet pricing is only half of the big picture. Customers aren't simply going to line up to buy a more expensive smartwatch that is inferior to the other ones on the market.

Apple didn't invent the MP3 player, smartphone, or tablet, but it disrupted all three markets. The reason is that Apple took its time and studied its competitors' weaknesses. With the iPod, Apple addressed the issue of limited storage for MP3s. With the iPhone, Apple removed the cramped smartphone keyboard and introduced a touchscreen-based mobile OS. With the iPad, Apple reinvented the tablet as a larger version of a smartphone, rather than a smaller version of a laptop.

Before and after Apple. Source: Wikimedia Commons and company websites.

These three examples demonstrate what Apple did the best. Instead of following the market, it fixed the flaws in existing devices and launched better ones. That's where the smartwatch industry is today -- companies are all scrambling to launch rushed devices to stake their claim in the wearables market.

That chaos means that Apple, once again, has a real opportunity to disrupt the market and crush the competition with a delayed but superior product.

Why the iWatch will be superior
There are three key problems with current generation smartwatches -- appearance, battery life, and usefulness. With so many high fashion executives on board, Apple likely will launch a sleeker device than the boxy Samsung Galaxy Gear or Sony SmartWatch. Meanwhile, Apple's recent acquisitions and hires indicate that it could also solve the second and third problems.

In May, Apple acquired LuxVue, a power-efficient LED company, which suggests that the iWatch could last longer on a single charge than current smartphones. Apple has also hired top designers from Nike's FuelBand division and other medical device companies, indicating that its watch could include plenty of biometric sensors.

That data will naturally be compatible with Apple's HealthKit platform, which will combine data from compatible fitness apps and wearable devices into a single iOS 8 dashboard known as Health. Health is connected to Epic Systems, a major electronic health records (EHR) company that covers over half of all patients in the U.S.

EHR connectivity, which can directly provide health data to doctors, could make the iWatch a more useful health monitor than current smartwatches, which lack that level of doctor-patient connectivity.

The Foolish takeaway
Despite these clear strengths, Apple will face fierce competition when it launches its iWatch.

Google (NASDAQ: GOOG  ) (NASDAQ: GOOGL  ) intends to flood the market with cheap Android smartwatches with Android Wear, a streamlined version of Android specifically designed for smartwatches. Samsung recently launched Simband, a modular wearable device that allows third-party companies to make custom devices with swappable health sensors. Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT  ) is also reportedly working on a new wearable device that will be compatible with Android, iOS, and Windows Phone devices.

However, there's plenty of room for all of these companies to coexist. Research firm ON World forecasts that the number of smartwatch shipments will soar from fewer than 4 million in 2013 to 330 million by 2018.

Apple just needs to concentrate on capturing the high end of the market with the iWatch, which could be much sleeker, pricier, and more feature-rich than customers imagine.

Leaked: Apple's next smart device (warning, it may shock you)
Apple recently recruited a secret-development "dream team" to guarantee its newest smart device was kept hidden from the public for as long as possible. But the secret is out, and some early viewers are claiming its everyday impact could trump the iPod, iPhone, and the iPad. In fact, ABI Research predicts 485 million of this type of device will be sold per year. But one small company makes Apple's gadget possible. And its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early in-the-know investors. To be one of them, and see Apple's newest smart gizmo, just click here!


Read/Post Comments (6) | Recommend This Article (7)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 10, 2014, at 10:43 AM, twolf2919 wrote:

    You say that bringing out the iPhone 5c was a mistake because Apple "listened" to the analysts who insisted Apple bring out a cheap iPhone to better compete in the emerging markets. Well, the analysts will say that the iPhone 5c was a mistake because Apple didn't price it low enough. No matter what Apple does, it's a mistake, apparently.

    I don't believe Apple made a mistake with the 5c - given that it was made of cheaper plastic, the price reflected that - but, like all Apple products, it still carried a premium price. And, contrary to popular belief, it is actually a successful product! At launch, it was the second-best selling phone - only the iPhone 5s sold better! In other words, how can a phone that sold better than any other non-Apple phone model be considered a failure???

    I don't think Apple will price its iWatch in the stratosphere. Since it will be a companion device - i.e. a device that doesn't do much if not paired with an iPhone - it will be priced substantially below an iPhone. Like existing smart watches, it'll be priced around $300. Unlike existing smart watches, it'll sell like hotcakes - because it'll be more functional and more stylish.

  • Report this Comment On July 10, 2014, at 11:02 AM, jdmeck wrote:

    I still think the 5C is a great first phone for the kids and I hope Apple does not rush to get rid of it.

  • Report this Comment On July 10, 2014, at 11:15 AM, pk22901 wrote:

    I know several friends who loved getting the 5c for 'free' when they renewed their 2 year commitment to Verizon. They just saw it as good enough and didn't think it was much different from the 5s (They didn't discuss this with me!).

    The 5c kept them in AppleLand. For all I know, they might have innocently chosen a GS5!

    So, from where I sit, the premium priced 5c is a brilliantly clever, profitable, and subtle strategic move by Team TC.

  • Report this Comment On July 10, 2014, at 11:31 AM, Oldfool103 wrote:

    I have never understood the complaints about the 5c. Putting aside the stupid c is for cheap/colourful discussion, it is pretty clear that this was a way of featuring last year's i5 at the expected $100 discount in a less expensive body. By creating the new look, it likely set up the c to replace the i4 as the lower priced model in emerging markets, and possibly for some period of time. Where I live in the Puerto Vallarta region, I drove a friend who needed to replace his old cell to the big TelMex store. The only Apple phone on display was the 5c, in a sea of Samsungs. It seems in poorer economies, the distinctive plastic look may have been designed to function in the same way as the white earbuds.

  • Report this Comment On July 10, 2014, at 2:00 PM, ConstableOdo wrote:

    Analysts believe they are smarter than the people who actually run Apple. I'm not sure why but everything that Apple does, most analysts will say Apple isn't doing it properly and that it could be done a lot better. I'm not sure if any of those analysts out there ever ran a business but they obviously think that Apple as a business isn't being run properly and the company is always making poor decisions concerning prices and acquisitions.

    It's really strange that although Apple is probably the most wealthiest company around by a huge margin, the analysts always say that Apple doesn't quite know what they're doing in order to compete against rival companies. I suppose analysts never consider that Apple may have different goals from them when it comes to selling products. I'd honestly like to know what gives analysts the right to tell Apple how to run their business. It doesn't make any sense at all.

  • Report this Comment On July 11, 2014, at 7:39 AM, lrd555 wrote:

    I don't think Apple needs an iWatch to crush the cheaper competition.

    Look at Samsung. Profits down 25%!

    HTC glad they made a meager profit!

    Motorola- who?

    Google I/O: High School kids could have done a better job at bascally saying we're copying Apple.

    If Apple does come out with a compelling product; it's basically the death nail for at least two of the above.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 3023794, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/21/2014 10:18:30 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement