A Lesson in Diplomacy for Pipeline Companies

A proposed Canadian project provides a better model for dealing with opposition.

Jul 11, 2014 at 12:08PM

Big energy projects often bring out opposition groups. Investors often think of such groups as intractable opponents and as obstacles to overcome. But a proposed project in Canada shows that this isn't always the case.

Opposition groups have blocked Canada's efforts to bring its oil and gas to international markets at every turn. TransCanada's (NYSE:TRP) Keystone XL pipeline encountered environmental concerns, while Enbridge Energy's (NYSE:ENB) Northern Gateway line met resistance from First Nations groups.

But on July 8, Steelhead LNG and the Huu-ay-aht First Nations (HFN) announced a joint project to develop a liquefied natural gas (LNG) facility on Vancouver Island. The proposed $30 billion project would produce up to 30 million tons of LNG per year, using gas from northern British Columbia. While this project is a long way off, and Steelhead isn't a public company, its approach to the project should interest energy investors.

A new model of cooperation
Representatives of both Steelhead and HFN compose a panel that will oversee the Steelhead LNG project. The project will only proceed after extensive consultation with Huu-ay-aht citizens. Contrast this constructive, consultative approach with what happened between Enbridge and First Nations.

First Nations are a group of 634 indigenous cultural communities across Canada. While such groups have opposed Enbridge's Northern Gateway pipeline and other energy projects, this didn't have to happen according to Doug Eyford, the Prime Minister's special envoy on aboriginal and energy issues.

According to a report in the Globe and Mail, Mr. Eyford feels that the Canadian government failed to help Enbridge navigate complex First Nation issues, and failed to consult First Nations groups early in the process. The report quoted the envoy as saying, "I was struck that some of the communities that are today threatening judicial proceedings and civil disobedience were at one time requesting meetings with federal officials and making what I believe, in retrospect, were feasible proposals to address the environmental and other issues associated with the project. Regrettably, there was no uptake."

More opportunities for investment
There are energy projects in Canada worth about $100 billion, and people like Mr. Eyford are working to gain aboriginal support for them. The way to do this is exemplified by the Steelhead LNG proposal. This is just a first step, but it may open the door to improved relations between the energy industry and First Nations groups in Canada.

The Steelhead LNG project will also be working with pipeline companies to deliver gas from northern B.C. to Vancouver Island. Such a pipeline company, by developing relationships with First Nation groups, could gain a strong competitive advantage.


Source: Enbridge Energy.

Enbridge and TransCanada are certainly candidates for involvement in the project. For Enbridge, it might go a long way toward mending fences with First Nations, and may even lead to an accommodation on its Northern Gateway Project. TransCanada has experience in similar projects. Its proposed Coastal Gaslink pipeline is part of a $9 billion project to move LNG to a proposed liquefaction plant at Kitimat on the Pacific coast.

Another company looking for pipeline projects in British Columbia is Spectra Energy (NYSE:SE) and its master limited partnership Spectra Energy Partners (NYSE:SEP). In 2012, Spectra helped develop plans for a pipeline from B.C. to a proposed LNG plant in Prince Rupert. The Financial Post quoted Spectra's CEO, Greg Ebel, as saying of British Columbia, "I don't think we are done with proposals." He went on to say, "The investment opportunity in U.S. LNG is hundred of millions, as the infrastructure is mature there, as opposed to billions of dollars in B.C."

The Zen of Foolishness
Investors in pipeline companies like Enbridge, TransCanada, and Spectra know how frustrating opposition to large capital projects can be. Look for companies that try to consult with opposition groups early on instead of taking a confrontational approach.

Also, keep an eye out for companies that get involved with the Steelhead LNG project. Any such company could gain a large competitive advantage through its relationship with First Nations. Such a company also demonstrates a more successful approach to working with potential opposition groups.

Top dividend stocks for the next decade
The smartest investors know that dividend stocks simply crush their non-dividend paying counterparts over the long term. That's beyond dispute. They also know that a well-constructed dividend portfolio creates wealth steadily, while still allowing you to sleep like a baby. Knowing how valuable such a portfolio might be, our top analysts put together a report on a group of high-yielding stocks that should be in any income investor's portfolio. To see our free report on these stocks, just click here now.

Scott Percival has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Spectra Energy. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information