Is It Time to Kill Lockheed Martin's $398.6 Billion F-35 Program?

Oil leaks, fires, and groundings. Is it time to put the F-35 out of its misery?

Jul 12, 2014 at 9:32AM


An F-35B Lightning II aircraft lands aboard the amphibious assault ship USS Wasp (LHD 1) during the second at-sea F-35 developmental test event. Source: U.S. Navy courtesy of Lockheed Martin by Andy Wolfe.

Thanks to an engine fire, Lockheed Martin's (NYSE:LMT) F-35 has been grounded. Further, thanks to this grounding, the F-35 won't fly at Britain's Royal International Air Tattoo, or RIAT, and could miss the Farnborough International Airshow, which starts on July 14.

Moreover, this latest development is just part of a series of problems plaguing the F-35, which now has a revised price of $398.6 billion just for accusation and development. Accordingly, this leads to the question: Is it time to kill the F-35?

Sky-high costs and massive problems
The F-35 is no stranger to problems. In addition to its recent engine fire, the F-35 is billions over budget, almost a decade behind schedule, and plagued by technical flaws. Plus, critics like Sen. John McCain are quick to point out that while the F-35 is supposed to reach initial operating capability in 2016, it will only do so by using a less lethal version of the software. 


F-35 Lightning II. Photo credit: Lockheed Martin via Northrop Grumman.

Furthermore, both Boeing (NYSE:BA) and USAF Col. Michael W. Pietrucha have questioned the F-35's ability to survive evolving threats, and this isn't the first time the F-35's been grounded due to engine problems. In early 2013, the F-35 was grounded due to a crack in the plane's engine -- and that's not the only issue.  

Chronic engine problems
Unfortunately, the F-35's recent engine fire isn't the first glitch to face United Technologies' (NYSE:UTX) Pratt & Whitney made F135 engine. In fact, according to, some of the F135's engine problems include: burning hotter than desired, repeated problems with the turbine blades, problems with the redesigned engine including failure to meet specifications, significant test failures, and a major oil leak -- which happened on June 13, just 10 days before the June 23 engine fire. 

More importantly, as points out, these complications -- many of them recurring -- could indicate that the F135 engine has serious design and structural faults. 

No "kill" order, yet...
So far the good news for Lockheed is that despite all of its problems, U.S. lawmakers still seem committed to supporting the F-35. Florida Sen. Bill Nelson described the recent engine fire as a "hiccup," and even longtime F-35 critic Sen. McCain said, "In some ways [the F-35's] too big to fail, but it's a debacle. We've been fighting this battle of cost overruns and glitches for a number of years," reports The Hill


F-35. Photo credit: Lockheed Martin via Northrop Grumman.

Plus Frank Kendall, Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, recently told the House Armed Services Committee that, "There's a growing body of evidence that this may have been an individual situation, not a systemic one. But we don't know that for certain at this point in time."  

The bad news is that the problems facing the F-35 continue to crop up, and one has to wonder how long the Pentagon will continue to support this program. Further, as Reuter's reports, a failure to appear at both the RIAT and Farnborough could cost Lockheed F-35 sales, as several countries are "weighing orders" for the F-35 and a grounding isn't exactly the best sales pitch.

What to watch
When it comes to Lockheed's bottom line, arguably no program is as important as the F-35. In 2013, the F-35 made up 16% of Lockheed's total consolidated net sales, and when Lockheed reported its first-quarter results for 2014, it said, "Aeronautics' net sales for the first quarter of 2014 increased $200 million, or 6 percent, compared to the same period in 2013. The increase was primarily attributable to higher net sales of about $190 million for F-35 production contracts due to increased volume."  

As such, anything that negatively, or positively, impacts the F-35 program is something to watch. Hopefully, whatever caused the latest engine problem will be an "easy" fix, and Lockheed's F-35 will return to the skies. However, the recurring engine problems could be cause for investor concern -- no matter how advanced it is, a warplane isn't much good without a working engine. Consequently, this is something investors should continue to closely monitor.

Top dividend stocks for the next decade
The smartest investors know that dividend stocks simply crush their non-dividend paying counterparts over the long term. That's beyond dispute. They also know that a well-constructed dividend portfolio creates wealth steadily, while still allowing you to sleep like a baby. Knowing how valuable such a portfolio might be, our top analysts put together a report on a group of high-yielding stocks that should be in any income investor's portfolio. To see our free report on these stocks, just click here now.

Katie Spence has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of Lockheed Martin. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information