This Obamacare Health Exchange Satisfaction Study Yields 5 Surprising Finds

Nine months following the start of open enrollment for Obamacare, officially known as Affordable Care Act, its success or failure is still largely determined by personal perceptions.

For those of you that attempted to use the federal exchange, Healthcare.gov, prior to December you likely ran into untold technical issues which may have prevented you from enrolling for health insurance. Chances are you may not have a very positive perception of the enrollment process because of these glitches. Conversely, If you signed up in January or beyond, with the exception of a few state-run exchanges such as Nevada, Vermont, and Hawaii, you likely had few technical problems enrolling for health insurance.

However, feedback from consumers... let me rephrase that... constructive criticism and genuine feedback from consumers that used the exchanges has been sparse at best. In other words, how are health exchange architects and insurance companies supposed to more effectively market their insurance plans without actionable feedback?


Source: White House on Flickr.

The good news is that J.D. Power has heeded the need for feedback and earlier this week published its inaugural Health Insurance Marketplace Shopper Study. In total, J.D. Power examined the satisfaction of 1,632 U.S. consumers that shopped for insurance on either state or federally run Obamacare health exchanges between Nov. 2013 and April 2014 in order to identity what factors drove consumer satisfaction, and what kept consumers from being satisfied during their shopping experience. 

Here are the five most surprising finds from J.D. Power's survey.

1. Personalization is vital.
According to J.D. Power's shopper study, the overall enrollment satisfaction of consumers was 615 on a 1,000 point scale – a fairly mediocre mark. However, the readings varied drastically depending on how consumers chose to sign up.

Raise your hand is you thought signing up for Obamacare in person would have yielded the highest satisfaction rating (719). You can all put your hands down because your nose is growing! Conversely, the 67% of consumers who chose to enroll online were the least satisfied of all with a satisfaction of 597, a full 122 points lower than those who signed up in person. Additionally, those who signed up by phone had a satisfaction rating of 623, with the use of a navigator boosting satisfaction (631) relative to those who didn't use a navigator over the phone (611).

Source: Rusty Ferguson, Flickr.

The main point here is that while technology is meant to streamline the enrollment process and save on costs over the long run, the exchanges need to find a way to be considerably more personable when courting consumers. These responses demonstrate that human-to-human interaction is still a more satisfying experience for most consumers, although glitches associated with Healthcare.gov could easily have played a role in dragging down online satisfaction. Accenture (NYSE: ACN  ) , the lead architect behind Healthcare.gov, is going to have to tackle this balancing act between streamlined technology and person-to-person interaction head on in 2015 if it hopes to improve consumer satisfaction going forward and get its contract renewed this coming year.

2. Cost is still king.
High premium costs are one of the decisive factors that have kept consumers from purchasing health insurance in the past. When asked, 89% of respondents noted in the affirmative that cost was a main reason why they had been uninsured prior to Obamacare's implementation.

However, cost is still king, even after the advent of the ACA's health exchanges. Specifically, 59% of respondents noted that costs weighed heavily in their overall plan purchasing decision with doctor visit co-pay costs (36%), out-of pocket maximums (32%), and annual deductibles (32%) being the three most prominent costs that consumers honed in on.

Source: Tax Credits, Flickr.

The implication here is that insurers really need to emphasize the quality-versus-value proposition of each tier of their plans. Although platinum and gold plans have higher monthly premiums, insurers could actually see bigger profits from bronze and silver plans since it requires more out-of-pocket cash from consumers for procedures and prescriptions.

This is one reason why a smaller insurer like Molina Healthcare (NYSE: MOH  ) has such a good chance at success on Obamacare's health exchanges. Molina only recently ventured into the individual care market. Previously it only enrolled individual citizens and families that qualified for government assistance (i.e., Medicaid). Consumer perception of Molina as an insurer for low-cost individuals and families could transfer over favorably and lead to healthy enrollment figures as long as it continues to emphasize the quality and value of its plans.

3. Plan tier and satisfaction are correlated.
This may not come as a complete shock, but plan tiers and consumer satisfaction were perfectly correlated.

Obamacare exchanges were set up in such a way that consumers would have their choice of four plan tiers: platinum, gold, silver, and bronze. A platinum plan has the highest upfront premium, but requires the insurance company to cover 90% of out-of-pocket fees with the consumer covering only the remaining 10% (up to their annual out-of-pocket expense limit). A gold plan offers a slightly lower premium and an 80%-20% split between insurers and consumers on costs. Silver and bronze plans offer a 70%-30% split and a 60%-40% split.

According to J.D. Power, platinum consumer satisfaction came in at 766, gold at 655, silver at 621 (silver was the most commonly purchased plan, totaling more than platinum, gold, and bronze plans combined), and bronze at 556.

What caused this 210-point satisfaction swing? I'd speculate it has to do with the comfort level in paying ACA premium prices. As we learned a moment ago cost is still king when selecting a health plan. If consumers are willing to pay upwards of $400 or $500 in monthly premiums for a platinum plan then monthly costs probably aren't a big concern for these citizens. On the flipside, a consumer who believes they'll struggle to afford health insurance, or won't use it, will be much more likely to purchase a bronze plan because it's the cheapest. Chances are this shopper isn't thrilled to be looking for insurance in the first place.

4. The law trumps desire.
As much as optimists would like to believe that the majority of new enrollees wanted health insurance, a majority of respondents (50%) noted that they were compelled by the ACA being a law to obtain health insurance rather than their desire to purchase health insurance (40%) because they couldn't previously afford it.


Source: LaDawna Howard, Flickr.

This has a couple of potential implications. First, it demonstrates that the penalty associated with non-compliance of the individual mandate (i.e., not purchasing health insurance) is doing its job of coercing uninsured individuals and families to sign up. More so, it could mean that as the magnitude of these penalties increases in 2015, 2016 and beyond we could see an even larger surge in Obamacare exchange enrollments, which would be beneficial to the insurance industry and hospital providers.

5. Media still plays a key role in ACA awareness.
Finally, J.D. Power's Marketplace Shopper Study also notes that consumers first heard about the marketplace through the news media (55%) significantly more often than through a state or federal agency (4%).

The takeaway here is that insurers, states, and the federal government need to work together to reach consumers on a broader scale. WellPoint (NYSE: WLP  ) , for instance, teamed up with Walgreen last year to not only offer brochures in Walgreen stores that would describe was the ACA was and how it could affect consumers, but also to develop a website, LearnAboutReform.com, which served as a one-stop shop to answer consumers' Obamacare questions. Going forward insurers are going to need to work with regulators to develop a plan to reach out to more consumers and allow ACA information, and not the media, to be their primary source of news.

With health-care costs rising, perhaps it's time you took advantage of this little-known tax "loophole"
Recent tax increases have affected nearly every American taxpayer. But with the right planning, you can take steps to take control of your taxes and potentially even lower your tax bill. In our brand-new special report "The IRS Is Daring You to Make This Investment Now!," you'll learn about the simple strategy to take advantage of a little-known IRS rule. Don't miss out on advice that could help you cut taxes for decades to come. Click here to learn more.


Read/Post Comments (5) | Recommend This Article (0)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 12, 2014, at 2:06 PM, Panth wrote:

    Dear Motley Fool,

    Please fire your web page writers! One of my personal pet peeves when on the internet is stupid popup screens that you cannot close. I wanted to find out more about that stock mentioned, not sign up for watch lists or anything like that. A popup without a way to close is a crime!

    I am a member, and consider rethinking my membership when I see that stuff!

  • Report this Comment On July 12, 2014, at 3:12 PM, RFTECH3000 wrote:

    Value is defined by two key factors :

    1.) how much Services you are getting for your money

    2.) how many of the services that you pay for you are actually going to use.

    #2 becomes especially important if you have to pay more for a plan that offers more services.

    A plan for example that includes contraceptive coverage, maternity care, pediatric dental care and breast exams and cost $400 a month will be considered a good value for a 25 year old female who paid $300 before for a plan who did not include all those services , sure the plan costs more but chances that she is going to use at least some of the services down the road are pretty good !

    But things change if you look at the same plan from the view of a 50 year old female or a 25 year old Gay male , those people will not consider this plan a good value because they are paying more to have a plan with services they are more than likely never going to use !

    If you can buy full coverage for the same cost on your old 75 chevy pickup then more than likely you will go for it but if you compare $175 a month for full coverage on your old bucket of rust to $25 for liability then it more likely that you will just stick with the basics !

  • Report this Comment On July 12, 2014, at 3:23 PM, RFTECH3000 wrote:

    One of the basic problems is our culture and how our definition of value has been changed over the last 20 years mostly thanks to the advertising industry .

    We are used to getting more for the SAME PRICE or preferably LESS , ads are full of buy 1 get one free deals, bonus buys that give you 25% more laundry soap or cereal for the same price and similar marketing ploys and we have learned to embrace them.

    As a result we have gotten into the mindset that we have a right to get more without paying more and this is why the basic advertising message of the ACA supporters - you pay more but you get more - is failing to resonate with consumers.

    Sure if we get more we will go for it but only if it doesn't cost more or - if it does - we can see a need for the services we are getting in the future !

    The ACA packed up a bunch of so called "essential benefits " in a one size fits all approach , as a result some people will find most if not all of the essential benefits useful to them and therefore wont mind paying a little more or some even may pay less than before while others don't see a need for most any of the essential benefits in their lives and therefore don't want to pay for it !

    All the talk about the greater good and explanations on why this approach is needed mostly falls on deaf ears with the exception of some bleeding heart liberals.

  • Report this Comment On July 13, 2014, at 9:37 AM, leobowdyo1 wrote:

    well part of the problem is I am forced to pay for medical care that I can't use...specially the law states that I ( a gay man) must pay for women's contraceptive/her pap smears/breast exams/maternity/her vaccume pumps while nursing etc.

    This is why the affordable health care plan is too expensive..I not only have to float older/unhealthy/those with expensive preexisting condition..but I also have to pay for women only related health care because obama decided to play santa claus for votes.

  • Report this Comment On July 13, 2014, at 9:38 AM, leobowdyo1 wrote:

    This is what is wrong with obamacare...those with subsidizes pay 95 dollars and the tax payer has to pick up the rest ( calculated at 500 dollars a month per person)...it is just throwing money at the problem instead of solving it

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 3025319, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/21/2014 4:58:22 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement