What Would It Mean for Manufacturers if Congress Were to Kill the Export-Import Bank?

Congress must decide by September whether to reauthorize an obscure but influential trade-focused federal agency.

Jul 13, 2014 at 4:01PM

A political shake-up in Congress has potentially put a little-known federal agency on the chopping block, much to the dismay of major American manufacturers, particularly Boeing (NYSE:BA), but also General Electric (NYSE:GE) and Caterpillar (NYSE:CAT). The manufacturers claim they need the Export-Import Bank to keep American products competitive in the global market and support American jobs, but incoming Republican leadership in the House is opposed to the agency, which they allege is a tool of crony capitalism.

What does the Export-Import Bank do?
Created in 1943, the Export-Import Bank is a federal agency charged with encouraging the foreign purchase of American products. The bank has four major programs to help finance American exports: 

  1. Direct lending to foreign purchasers of American products.
  2. Providing guarantees to banks that lend to purchases of American products.
  3. Insuring American exporters and banks against losses from foreign borrowers.
  4. Guaranteeing bank loans going to provide working capital to U.S. exporters.

The Export-Import Bank finances its own operations by borrowing money from the U.S. Treasury, later repaying the funds borrowed with interest. The bank covers its operating costs through fees to its customers and interest charged on its own loans,

Who benefits from the Export-Import Bank?
There's a reason the Ex-Im Bank has been nicknamed the "Bank of Boeing." The aviation giant's jet planes have historically been by far the largest recipients of the Ex-Im Bank's loans and guarantees in terms of total dollar value. In 2013, the Ex-Im Bank provided over $8 billion in financing to Boeing, making up over 30% of the bank's total financial exposure. Foreign airlines purchasing Boeing jets are similarly benefiting by being on the opposite end of the transaction, receiving favorable financial terms under which to buy the planes.

Other big manufacturers to receive windfall financing from the bank include General Electric, which enjoyed loans and guarantees totaling over $2.6 billion in 2013, and Caterpillar, whose Solar Turbine subsidiary received guarantees totaling over $1.3 billion in 2013.

The Ex-Im Bank also assists much smaller American businesses seeking to export. Historically the largest manufacturers have eaten up the lion's share of the Ex-Im Bank's total financial assistance by dollar value, and 2013 was no different with the top 10 beneficiaries taking in over 75% of the bank's total financial assistance portfolio. But the Ex-Im Bank notes that small businesses account for over 90% of the bank's total number of transactions, and that the bank has made exports possible for over 3,000 American small businesses.

Who's opposed to the Export-Import Bank?
The primary industry opponents of the Ex-Im Bank are the big domestic airliner, like Delta (NYSE:DAL), who feel that their foreign competitors are getting rosier terms to purchase Boeing jets than they are, allowing foreign airlines to outcompete domestic airlines on U.S. -- international routes. Delta CEO Richard Anderson recently called for the Ex-Im Bank to be renewed, albeit with the critical "reform" that it be prohibited from financing the purchase of wide-body aircraft by foreign state-owned or state-subsidized airlines -- which is basically all of them.

Critics also charge that the Ex-Im Bank is in the business of picking winners and losers, and it's hard to disagree. Small businesses that receive preferential Ex-Im Bank financing have significant advantages over their direct competitors that don't, making it unclear just how many jobs the Ex-Im Bank supports on net.

Beyond picking winners and losers, the Ex-Im Bank has also been accused of being a taxpayer subsidy to big business, as it uses taxpayer money to finance risky private loans. For decades, the Bank has returned more to the Treasury than it borrowed, essentially acting as a free revenue source for taxpayers. However, critics up to and including the Export-Import Bank's own Inspector General believe that the agency is not assessing risk properly or responsibility. That could expose the Bank, and therefore the U.S. Treasury and the taxpayer, to massive losses in the case of customer defaults.

What would happen if the Export-Import Bank wasn't reauthorized?
The Ex-Im Bank would be permitted to carry out the terms of its current agreements, but could not originate new loans or guarantees, essentially winding itself down to nothing over time. American manufacturers currently enjoying access to the bank would need to arrange alternative financing or export fewer goods. Larger manufacturers with global exports typically have their own internal credit businesses specifically to make it easier for customers to buy their products, and in Boeing's case in particular, these captive finance arms would likely be expected to pick up the slack. Only Boeing would be seriously stressed by this, as according to credit-rating agency Standard & Poor the company could need to double or triple its customer finance portfolio, which could hurt its credit rating.

Longer term, supporters of the Ex-Im Bank warn that American exporters may be outcompeted by foreign firms that enjoy the favorable financing of their own export credit agencies, and again this is a more serious threat for Boeing than anyone else. While the advantage of favorable financing is relatively slight, Boeing's competition with European competitor Airbus tends to be close and brutal, and could therefore hurt Boeing's order book.

As far as broader economic repercussions, with the vagaries of international trade, it's impossible to know what effect this would have on the broader economy, but whether positive or negative the effect is unlikely to be noticeable. In 2013, the Ex-Im Bank authorized $27 billion to support $37 billion in export sales, accounting for about 1.6% of total U.S. exports.

Top dividend stocks for the next decade
The smartest investors know that dividend stocks simply crush their non-dividend paying counterparts over the long term. That's beyond dispute. They also know that a well-constructed dividend portfolio creates wealth steadily, while still allowing you to sleep like a baby. Knowing how valuable such a portfolio might be, our top analysts put together a report on a group of high-yielding stocks that should be in any income investor's portfolio. To see our free report on these stocks, just click here now.

Daniel Ferry owns shares of Caterpillar and General Electric Company. The Motley Fool owns shares of General Electric Company. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information