Forget Earnings: Catalysts Incoming for Novartis Stock

Novartis's second quarter earnings were ho-hum, but that's not why investors are bullish about the shares

Jul 17, 2014 at 2:00PM

With Novartis (NYSE:NVS) in the midst of a business transformation process and management projecting significant improvements, investors are a little less interested in quarterly results for the time being. Results for the second quarter were OK, but sluggish growth in Pharma highlights the importance of good clinical data on LCZ696 in heart failure and progress over the next 12 months in the immuno-oncology portfolio.

The Street is pretty bullish on these shares, though the performance on a year-to-date basis has been more middle of the road between the likes of Merck (NYSE: MRK), Bristol-Myers (NYSE: BMY), Pfizer, and Roche. It would seem that a lot of optimism on LCZ696 and margin improvements is getting worked into the shares and while stronger-than-expected data on LCZ696 and/or the immuno-oncology portfolio would be well-received, I think investors already expect more from Novartis than virtually any other Big Pharma company.

A slight miss isn't a major problem ... yet
Novartis reported OK second quarter results, as sales and operating profits were slightly below expectations on a "core" basis and would have been a little weaker still if the discontinued operations (including the vaccine business being transferred to GlaxoSmithKline) had been included.

Revenue rose 2% on a constant currency basis, with Pharma up 1%, Alcon up 4%, and Sandoz up 4%. Consumer (which is going into a JV w/ Glaxo) was up 5%, while Vaccines were down 14%. Within Pharma, Glivec remains the revenue leader, with sales up 1% to $1.2 billion, while Gilenya was the fastest-growing major drug (up 29% to $606 million).

Gross margin declined a point from last year, but operating income rose 6%. Pharma led the way with 8% operating profit growth, while Sandoz saw profits up 3% and Alcon profits rose 2%. All told, this was a pretty solid result for Pharma from a margin perspective and a strong performance for Alcon, helped by a lower mix of equipment in the sales. Sandoz was relatively disappointing though not to a large degree.

Will LCZ696 deliver?
Investors and analysts were pleasantly surprised when the PARADIGM-HF study was halted early due to surprisingly good efficacy. The history of clinical development of heart failure drugs has been rather poor and this good news has raised hopes that LCZ696, a combination of Diovan and a neprilsyin inhibitor, can be one of the few drugs to show meaningful benefit and take advantage of what should be a multibillion-dollar market.

Given that the target for the PARADIGM-HF study was a 15% reduction in mortality, an early halt for positive efficacy would suggest a significantly better benefit – perhaps north of 25%. While there are around 11 million people in the U.S. and Europe with congestive heart failure, around half of those have reduced ejection fraction and would be likely candidates for this drug. At a price of $3,500/year (in line with Bayer's Xarelto), that would be a market opportunity in excess of $18 billion.

Not all of the 5.5 million or so patients with reduced ejection fraction will be in that patient pool (about two-thirds are/will be treated with drug therapy) and the actual annual price may be lower, but this is still a very large opportunity for Novartis. I would think that Novartis will need to show a 30% or better improvement in mortality to really maximize its potential and the effective price may be lower, but 50% share of the two-thirds getting drug treatment and a $2,000/yr ASP is still a $3.6 billion opportunity.

Right now analysts are estimating $1.5 billion in 2018 sales. Remember that most analysts use risk-adjusted numbers in the models so "$1.5 billion" can really mean something closer to $2.5 billion. All that said, it would seem that the market is already pricing in more than $3 billion in sales, so Novartis really does need to deliver good data on August 31.

Late to the immuno-oncology game, but this is a long race
Other than its CART-19 platform, Novartis had been seen as a laggard in the immuno-oncology field behind the likes of Bristol-Myers, Merck, and Roche. The acquisition earlier this year of CoStim changes that perception to some extent. With CoStim, Novartis gains opportunities in PD-L1/PD-1 as well as less crowded opportunities (for now, at least) like LAG-3 and TIM-3.

The immuno-oncology story is going to play out over a decade or more, and this is why I've been a little skeptical about the hype over the programs at Bristol-Myers and Merck; just as almost every Big Pharma eventually had a statin, there will be many immuno-oncology competitors. With that, taking an early lead may be exciting for shareholders, but likely won't mean much in terms of durable market share. Novartis is behind, but the company appears to be taking a broader approach to the market, more akin to Roche in at least some respects, and that may ultimately be a better strategy compared to Bristol-Myers' early mover advantage and Merck's partnering strategy.

The bottom line
Unless investors are prepared to use a very low discount rate, Novartis's share price already seems to factor in expectations for close to double-digit annual FCF growth for the next decade. That is one of the largest/strongest growth expectations in Big Pharma. It's not impossible – congestive heart failure, immuno-oncology, combo therapy for breast cancer, and smart contact lenses could all be huge opportunities – but it's not exactly a conservative expectation. What's more, management has been fairly aggressive in projecting significant margin improvements in the coming years (despite the need to invest in immuno-oncology and, presumably, support an LCZ696 launch). Add it all up and Novartis really has its work cut out to deliver results strong enough to exceed these elevated expectations.

But expectations for this stock may seriously understate the opportunity
Let's face it -- the best investors consistently reap gigantic profits by recognizing true potential earlier and more accurately than anyone else. Let me cut right to the chase. There is a product in development that will revolutionize not just how we treat a common chronic illness, but potentially the entire health industry. Analysts are already licking their chops at the sales potential. In order to outsmart Wall Street and realize multi-bagger returns you will need The Motley Fool’s new free report on the dream-team responsible for this game-changing blockbuster. CLICK HERE NOW.

Stephen D. Simpson, CFA owns shares of Roche. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

A Financial Plan on an Index Card

Keeping it simple.

Aug 7, 2015 at 11:26AM

Two years ago, University of Chicago professor Harold Pollack wrote his entire financial plan on an index card.

It blew up. People loved the idea. Financial advice is often intentionally complicated. Obscurity lets advisors charge higher fees. But the most important parts are painfully simple. Here's how Pollack put it:

The card came out of chat I had regarding what I view as the financial industry's basic dilemma: The best investment advice fits on an index card. A commenter asked for the actual index card. Although I was originally speaking in metaphor, I grabbed a pen and one of my daughter's note cards, scribbled this out in maybe three minutes, snapped a picture with my iPhone, and the rest was history.

More advisors and investors caught onto the idea and started writing their own financial plans on a single index card.

I love the exercise, because it makes you think about what's important and forces you to be succinct.

So, here's my index-card financial plan:


Everything else is details. 

Something big just happened

I don't know about you, but I always pay attention when one of the best growth investors in the world gives me a stock tip. Motley Fool co-founder David Gardner (whose growth-stock newsletter was rated #1 in the world by The Wall Street Journal)* and his brother, Motley Fool CEO Tom Gardner, just revealed two brand new stock recommendations moments ago. Together, they've tripled the stock market's return over 12+ years. And while timing isn't everything, the history of Tom and David's stock picks shows that it pays to get in early on their ideas.

Click here to be among the first people to hear about David and Tom's newest stock recommendations.

*"Look Who's on Top Now" appeared in The Wall Street Journal which references Hulbert's rankings of the best performing stock picking newsletters over a 5-year period from 2008-2013.