Can NVIDIA Outsmart Intel in High-Performance Computing?

Intel and NVIDIA are competing in the high-performance computing market, with Intel seemingly on the offensive. Will NVIDIA suffer, or does it have a trick up its sleeve?

Jul 18, 2014 at 11:00AM

For several years, NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been looking to branch out beyond gaming. The company found that its GPUs can be used to drastically speed up code that can be run in parallel, which makes NVIDIA's technology perfect for accelerating high-performance computing, or HPC. As a result, NVIDIA released a product called Tesla in 2010, which combines the company's GPU with software to provide HPC acceleration.

Currently, NVIDIA has a dominant share in HPC accelerators, but recently, Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) has been trying to muscle in on this market with a new line of co-processors, called the Xeon Phi. Intel already provides processors for many HPC environments, so is its move into accelerators really bad news for NVIDIA?

Intel gains ground in HPC
Tesla saw 37% revenue growth in 2013, and NVIDIA's management expects accelerating growth down the line. Furthermore, according to the TOP500 supercomputer ranking, 67 of the world's top 500 supercomputers use some kind of co-processor or accelerator, and of these, almost two-thirds use NVIDIA's Tesla.

Intel's Xeon Phi, introduced in 2012, is featured in 16 of the 67 top supercomputers that use accelerators. This trails NVIDIA, but Intel has had some high-profile wins, including the Tianhe-2, the world's largest supercomputer. Additionally, the upcoming release in the Xeon Phi line, code named Knights Landing, combines both the CPU and the accelerators, possibly posing even more of a threat to NVIDIA.

Why NVIDIA isn't worried
NVIDIA is confident that its technology is superior, and independent reviews show significantly better performance on financial benchmarks using Tesla over current versions of Xeon Phi. In addition, the company has a first-mover advantage, since programs have already been written and optimized for its Tesla platform.

On the other hand, Motley Fool analyst Timothy Green sees Intel's upcoming Knights Landing processor as a big threat to NVIDIA. He cites the power efficiency of Intel's next-generation chips and the unified processor/accelerator architecture as advantages that might disrupt NVIDIA's growth in the HPC market. But, NVIDIA might still have a move to turn the tables on Intel.

Who's chasing whom?
NVIDIA recently announced that Tesla is now compatible with ARM-based chips, the kind of low-powered processors that run smartphones and tablets, which are increasingly taking business away from Intel's x86 architecture. The ARM/Tesla approach is already gaining traction, and is planned to be used in a next-generation supercomputer that is to be built in Barcelona and will attempt to overtake the Tianhe-2 in performance.

So, in spite of looking like the aggressor, it is actually Intel that might see a decrease in its overall HPC share. Current HPC revenue is not very significant for either company, with NVIDIA estimating that its data center products, which include Tesla, earn "tens of millions of dollars" per year, a tiny slice of its $4 billion in annual revenue. But, trends in HPC signal more widespread changes later, giving Intel something to worry about.

The bottom line
Intel and NVIDIA are fighting it out in the high-performance computing processor market, with Intel appearing to be the aggressor and gaining share. However, NVIDIA's accelerators still lead in terms of performance, and NVIDIA's support for ARM-based chips might even undermine Intel's position in HPC. While this wouldn't be a huge blow in terms of revenue, Intel should worry that ARM-based chips are taking even more of its business away.

Leaked: Apple's next smart device (warning, it may shock you)
Apple recently recruited a secret-development "dream team" to guarantee its newest smart device was kept hidden from the public for as long as possible. But the secret is out, and some early viewers are claiming its everyday impact could trump the iPod, iPhone, and the iPad. In fact, ABI Research predicts 485 million of this type of device will be sold per year. But one small company makes Apple's gadget possible. And its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early-in-the-know investors. To be one of them, and see Apple's newest smart gizmo, just click here!

Srdjan Bejakovic has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Intel and Nvidia. The Motley Fool owns shares of Intel. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information