Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.



Why I'm Skeptical About the Apple iWatch

Though the world seems to be expecting that Apple's (NASDAQ: AAPL  ) allegedly upcoming smart watch (dubbed by some as the iWatch) will be a game changer, there's a real chance that the iWatch won't do as well as many seem to expect.

Smartwatches are the latest attempt at the "next big thing"
Ever since the launch of the iPhone in 2007 and then the iPad in 2010, the investment community has been anxiously awaiting the next big thing from Apple as the smartphone and tablet markets mature. 

Now, the argument is that cell phones were just cheap, uninteresting commodities before the iPhone, so Apple can similarly transform the watch market. But it's important to note that Apple's gigantic smartphone profits have, in no small part, been due to a very innovative carrier subsidy model that brought what would otherwise be rather expensive, inaccessible devices to the masses. 

The iWatch would not only need to be a fundamentally game-changing device in terms of the usage model (similar to the iPad or iPhone), but it would need to be accessible at a low enough price so as to drive meaningful volumes and fairly rapid upgrade cycles (the iPad didn't have this, so it couldn't replicate the iPhone's financial success). That's not to say that a company like Apple can't achieve a meaningful financial uplift from the introduction of a smartwatch, but it's not going to be easy. 

The expectations seem to be going ballistic
One important factor that could lead to a perceived "disaster" for the iWatch is that there are a number of analysts putting out some pretty optimistic numbers for sales of this still-fictional device. For example, Morgan Stanley's Katy Huberty seems to think that Apple could sell between 30 and 60 million of these devices at an average selling price of $300 in the first year of availability. 

Driving home this point, Seeking Alpha contributor Paulo Santos recently made a very nice argument illustrating just why even if Apple's iWatch is a smash success, it still might not be a large driver of Apple's revenues/profits.

Moreover, Santos notes that Swatch Group  (NASDAQOTH: SWGAY  ) , the leading vendor of watches, generates only $9.86 billion in annual sales across a wide spectrum of watch offerings from the low end to the very high end. Is Apple likely to surpass Swatch Group's entire revenue base in just the first year of availability of the iWatch? It's possible, but this seems very optimistic. 

Foolish bottom line
Only time will tell whether the iWatch -- if it's even real -- will be a commercial success. The real question isn't so much about how well the iWatch does as whether the demand will ultimately keep up with some of the expectations floating around the investment community.

Even if the iWatch is successful in defining a fundamentally useful new product category, it's not at all clear that long-term demand profile for this product category will approach that of the iPad, let alone the iPhone. In that sense, the iWatch seems to be destined for disaster, even if it ultimately ends up being yet another nicely profitable product category for Apple. 

Leaked: Apple's next smart device (warning, it may shock you)
Apple recently recruited a secret-development "dream team" to guarantee its newest smart device was kept hidden from the public for as long as possible. But the secret is out, and some early viewers are claiming its everyday impact could trump the iPod, iPhone, and the iPad. In fact, ABI Research predicts 485 million of this type of device will be sold per year. But one small company makes Apple's gadget possible. And its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early in-the-know investors. To be one of them, and see Apple's newest smart gizmo, just click here!

Read/Post Comments (5) | Recommend This Article (2)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 20, 2014, at 11:11 PM, SimchaStein wrote:

    I'm skeptical of anyone who uses the word iWatch. So I did not read a word of your article. Watch is the wrong metaphor; it's a copy cat phrase.

  • Report this Comment On July 21, 2014, at 12:53 AM, actreal wrote:

    What does it say about technology sector articles when the comments are usually more interesting and informative than the articles.

    No one knows anything about the " I watch".

    Therefore no one can make any meaningful comments about it. Unfortunately that does not stop them from commenting.

    I am excited to see if there is an "I Watch" and what Apple can bring to the table to make it desirable. End of story.

  • Report this Comment On July 21, 2014, at 1:22 AM, Nohjnogias wrote:

    To compare the Apple iWatch to the Swatch is pure, unadulterated nonsense.

  • Report this Comment On July 21, 2014, at 4:04 AM, zippero wrote:

    Ashraf, it will beat the pants off of any Swatch, just as an iPhone beats the pants off of any feature phone. Tim Cook and Eddy Cue didn't say Apple had the best pipeline in 25 years coming this year for nothing.

  • Report this Comment On July 21, 2014, at 4:20 AM, zippero wrote:

    Ashraf, the iWatch will ride on the back of the iPhone's carrier model or get its own subsidies because it will have its own cellular account. Either way, it's a phone, so the carrier model will benefit it the same way it benefited the iPhone. Eventually, the iWatch will be bigger than the iPhone because it's just fundamentally more convenient to have a computer/phone attached to one's wrist at all times (and also is not creepy like Google Glass). There's no more losing it or scrounging around for it when one needs it. It'll always just be there on your wrist, and one will wonder later why people ever even kept separate smartphones around. Tim Cook mentioned the voice messaging he observed while walking down the street in China, and such functionality would naturally be better with iWatch. The same goes with many other simpler functions that don't require a ton of screenspace.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 3033955, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/3/2015 11:26:26 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Ashraf Eassa

Ashraf Eassa is a technology specialist with The Motley Fool. He writes mostly about technology stocks, but is especially interested in anything related to chips -- the semiconductor kind, that is. Follow him on Twitter:

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 16,533.57 182.19 1.11%
S&P 500 1,970.64 21.78 1.12%
NASD 4,795.48 45.50 0.96%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

9/3/2015 11:10 AM
AAPL $112.29 Down -0.05 -0.04%
Apple CAPS Rating: ****
SWGAY $19.37 Up +0.28 +1.44%
Swatch CAPS Rating: **