Has Intel's Technological Lead Exhausted?

Historically, Intel's (NASDAQ: INTC  ) chip fabrication process has been more advanced than its peers'. The chipmaker, for instance, is the first to mass-manufacture computing chips based on a 22nm and 14nm FinFET lithography. This technological lead, in turn, has allowed Intel to repeatedly deliver impressive performance gains under a comparable power draw, before its peers. 

Heading further into 2014, however, Intel's hegemony may be challenged. GlobalFoundries and Taiwan Semiconductor (NYSE: TSM  )  -- leading pure-play chip manufacturers -- are catching up fast. More to the point, their shift to 14nm and 16nm FinFET fabrication process, respectively, may be detrimental to Intel's growth going forward. 

The story so far
It's worth noting that, technologically, Intel's highly touted tri-gate, introduced with its Ivy Bridge launch, is essentially the FinFET technology that Global Foundries and Taiwan Semiconductor are currently perfecting. In fact, tri-gate FETs, or field effect transistors, are a subset of FinFETs, originally manufactured as bi-gates. 

By adopting a smaller process node, Intel was able to cram more transistors onto the same die. By covering its FETs with a thin silicon coating (which gave birth to the term FinFET), electrical leakages were reduced, thereby making Ivy Bridge chips power-efficient. Consequently, Ivy Bridge chips are about 20% faster and 20% power-efficient than their equivalent Sandy Bridge predecessors. 

Intel's 14nm fabrication process, used to manufacture its latest Haswell chips, was believed to have extended its competitive lead. But, earlier this year, GlobalFoundries and Taiwan Semiconductor announced plans to mass-manufacture FinFET chips based on 14nm and 16nm lithography, respectively. This is something that should, in theory, bring all three companies at par, technology-wise. 

Taiwan Semiconductor claims that its 16nm process improves the chip's power-efficiency and performance by up to 55% and 35%, respectively, compared to its 28nm chips. GlobalFoundries, on the other hand, claims that its 14nm chips offer a 20% performance improvement and a 35% power-draw reduction, compared to its currently available 20nm chips. 

Probable impact on Intel
These performance increments can prove detrimental to Intel's growth going forward. First, Intel is currently the only chip manufacturer to fabricate low-power system-on-chips using FinFET technology. Once GlobalFoundries and Taiwan Semiconductor catch-up, Intel's Atom lineup won't be able to fiercely compete with the companies' latest smartphone and tablet-targeted ARM-based chips, which could hamper Intel's growth in the mobile segment.

Second, several fabless computing chip providers, including Advanced Micro Devices, Texas Instruments, and Qualcomm, are reportedly developing their own iterations of ARM-based 64-bit server CPUs. These tech giants outsource manufacturing to pure-play chip manufacturers like GlobalFoundries and Taiwan Semiconductor. 

By using an advanced fabrication process, these companies will now be better-equipped to compete fiercely with the tried-and-tested high-performance Intel Xeon line-up. Intel generates approximately 20% of its revenue from the sale of server chips, and commands a 90% market share in the segment. ARM, however, aims to aggressively enter the server chip segment and hopes to control 10% of the industry by 2017. Naturally, intensifying competition in the space will have a negative impact on Intel's top-line. 

Foolish final thoughts
Currently, both GlobalFoundries and Taiwan Semiconductor are perfecting their FinFET technology, with plans to mass-manufacture these chips by early 2015. Whether the chips pose a threat to Intel's dominance will actually depend on their performance and power efficiency improvements.

In the end, the competition will boil down to whose fabrication process is more efficient, rather than which entity manufactures chips using the smallest process nodes. Investors, therefore, might want to keep a close eye on relative performance and efficiency benchmarks, and make informed decisions accordingly.

Leaked: Apple's next smart device (warning, it may shock you)
Apple recently recruited a secret-development "dream team" to guarantee its newest smart device was kept hidden from the public for as long as possible. But the secret is out, and some early viewers are claiming its everyday impact could trump the iPod, iPhone, and the iPad. In fact, ABI Research predicts 485 million of this type of device will be sold per year. But one small company makes Apple's gadget possible. And its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early in-the-know investors. To be one of them, and see Apple's newest smart gizmo, just click here!

 


Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (3)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 21, 2014, at 10:51 AM, golmal wrote:

    Too many factual mistakes.

    FETs with thin Si coating give FINFETs?

    Haswell has been in market for an year, so Intel released it's 14nm already?

    Global Foundries have currently available 20nm chips?

    You sir, need a semiconductor version of spell check before you attempt to ever write one more article.

  • Report this Comment On July 21, 2014, at 11:34 AM, BuzzVestor wrote:

    Corrections. There was a mix-up while editing.

    "Intel's 14nm fabrication process, used to manufacture its upcoming Broadwell chips..."

    "[GlobalFoundries']14nm [FinFET] chips offer a 20% performance improvement and a 35% power-draw reduction, compared to currently available 20nm chips. "

    Apologies for the errors.

    Thanks,

    Author

  • Report this Comment On July 22, 2014, at 11:45 AM, Fsteddie81 wrote:

    Author,

    There are many more factual and conceptual errors in this article and I must agree with the first commenter that you need some education in semiconductors before you attempt to write such terrible articles.

    The precursor to a finfet (trigate...same thing) is not a bi-gate(? not even clear what that means) it is a planer FET. Finfet takes us from a flat 2d gate to a gate that is wrapped over a fin of silicon. Intel calls it a trigate because you can think of the wrapped gate as covering the sides and top of the fin.

    "But, earlier this year, GlobalFoundries and Taiwan Semiconductor announced plans to mass-manufacture FinFET chips based on 14nm and 16nm lithography, respectively. This is something that should, in theory, bring all three companies at par, technology-wise. " This is utter non-sense. You cannot compare a couple of companies announcing plans for 16/14nm chips that will likely not see a store shelf for a minimum of 2 years to a company that is already shipping a 14nm product and call it on par?? Intel will likely ship 10nm chips in a similar time frame to anyone else shipping 16nm.

    The quote which you restated in your comment is still not accurate "[GlobalFoundries']14nm [FinFET] chips offer a 20% performance improvement and a 35% power-draw reduction, compared to currently available 20nm chips. ". Global foundries nor Samsung nor TSMC have ever sold a 20nm chip. Even their 20nm chip lines are behind Intel's 14nm chips which are being shipped and will be on store shelves in months.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 3036486, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/2/2014 1:16:13 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement