What Google's Bet on Containers Means for VMware

Google is standing firmly behind a new technology called Linux containers, which could eventually displace virtual machines. Is this terrible news for the main provider of virtual machine technology, VMware?

Jul 22, 2014 at 10:00AM

The last ten years have been the era of compute virtualization, as applications became divorced from the hardware that runs them, thanks to the technology of virtual machines. One company, VMware (NYSE:VMW), has been tied more closely to virtual machines than any other, and it is VMware that succeeded in bringing this technology to enterprise. As a result, VMware's revenue grew from around $200 million ten years ago to over $5 billion in 2013.

But now, it seems like the landscape is changing, with a new technology called Linux containers seemingly taking the place of virtual machines at many major cloud companies. In particular, Google (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) already deploys more than 2 billion containers each week, and it recently announced support for Docker, a platform for transporting and deploying containers, in its Google Compute Engine. Does this increasing support for containers signal the beginning of the end of VMware's incredible run?

What's the difference between containers and virtual machines?
A virtual machine is a way of bundling the operating system and all its applications. Each virtual machine is run in a software layer called the hypervisor that runs on top of the native operating system and the underlying hardware. This way, different operating systems and associated applications can be run on the same supporting system, allowing for simpler management and greater resource use.


Virtual machines allow different operating systems to run on the same hardware. Source: VMware. 

Linux containers also encapsulate and isolate applications. However, they are a lightweight alternative to VMs, as they only include certain dependencies rather than the entire underlying operating system. Instead, the environment that the container runs in will provide the core, or kernel, of the operating system.


Containers on Google's infrastructure compared with virtual machines. Source: Google.

There are both advantages and disadvantages to containers when compared to virtual machines. The disadvantages are a lower level of isolation, and the restriction that the application in the container has to be runnable on the operating system of the enclosing environment. However, the corresponding advantages are containers' significantly smaller sizes and faster start-up times, as well as the ability to patch multiple containers by simply patching the underlying system.

The rising popularity of containers
Currently, containers are one of the hottest cutting-edge IT trends. Google runs all its internal as well as external services as containers, and it has already contributed several open-source tools to drive further Linux container adoption. Other cloud providers, including Microsoft, IBM, and Rackspace, are also providing support for container technologies.

And now, Red Hat (NYSE:RHT) has included support for containers in its most recent version of Red Hat Enterprise Linux, or RHEL, which was released in June. With the growing popularity of RHEL in enterprise server environments, this will give an additional push to containers and might transform them from a promising but experimental technology to a mainstream enterprise solution.

What this means for VMware
VMware already has a large base of paying customers that are effectively locked in to its virtualization technology. Containers are unlikely to threaten this in any meaningful way. Also, there will always be use cases for full-fledged virtual machines, such as running legacy or non-Linux applications on commoditized hardware.

But the server virtualization market is getting gradually tapped out, and VMware has been looking to new areas for growth, including to hybrid cloud computing. It is here that containers might seriously interfere with VMware's ambitions, as the excitement and support for containers among cloud companies indicates. VMware tied its fate to a technology that was wildly successful for a period of time, but unless it adapts, the company could easily find itself left behind. 

Warren Buffett: This new technology is a "real threat"
At the recent Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting, Warren Buffett admitted this emerging technology is threatening his biggest cash-cow. While Buffett shakes in his billionaire-boots, only a few investors are embracing this new market which experts say will be worth over $2 trillion. Find out how you can cash in on this technology before the crowd catches on, by jumping onto one company that could get you the biggest piece of the action. Click here to access a FREE investor alert on the company we're calling the "brains behind" the technology.

Srdjan Bejakovic has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Google (A shares), Google (C shares), and VMware. The Motley Fool owns shares of Google (A shares), Google (C shares), International Business Machines, Microsoft, and VMware. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information