Is the Kinect-less Xbox One a Flop for Microsoft?

The introduction of a $399 Xbox One SKU wasn't enough to drive sales of the platform above Sony's PlayStation 4. What does this mean for Microsoft?

Jul 23, 2014 at 10:05AM

June 9 saw the release of a $399 Xbox One SKU that doesn't include the Kinect camera. The move coincided with Microsoft's (NASDAQ:MSFT) highly games-centric E3 conference and arrived after months of Sony's (NYSE:SNE) PlayStation 4 posting superior sales. With the introduction of the Kinect-less Xbox One, versions of the competing consoles now retail at price parity, but that hasn't been enough to elevate sales of Microsoft's new platform above the competition. Does this mean that the new SKU is a flop for Microsoft? What will be the company's next big gaming moves?

How effective was the $399 Xbox One in raising sales?
Sales tracking from NPD Group lists combined Xbox One sales for the month of June at 197,000 units, while the PlayStation 4 sold approximately 269,000 units in the same period. Putting this in context with previous months sales, Xbox One sold approximately 77,000 units in May and 115,000 units in April, with May sales having been depressed by the announcement of the new SKU. Over the last two months, Microsoft's new console has sold an average of 137,000 units in North America, hardly representative a big jump over April's numbers. Meanwhile, PlayStation 4 sold approximately 200,000 units in April and 197,000 units in May. When looking at sales over a three-month period, it doesn't appear that the introduction of the $399 SKU has dramatically improved Xbox One's market prospects. That said, the introduction of the less-expensive console is one of the first moves in a more long-term strategy to better challenge the PlayStation 4.

It's still far too early to measure how successful the Kinect-less Xbox One is, as the real metric for its performance will be whether it creates a sustained hardware bump. The fact that PlayStation 4 still outsold the platform by a substantial amount indicates that Microsoft must improve the system's value proposition in ways other than bringing cost down. June's sales gap may make the console manufacturer more likely to implement price reductions across SKUs within the fiscal year, but it also needs to address other aspects of its platform.

Will Microsoft purchase game developers?
With Xbox One and PlayStation 4 now available at the same price point, Microsoft is tasked with convincing consumers that its less-powerful hardware represents the better purchase. Given that most multi-platform games will run better on PS4, this means that the appeal of Xbox One is largely dependent on its exclusive content offerings. Microsoft's platform looks to enjoy an edge over its chief competitor in terms of high-profile exclusives this year, but it may need to increase its holdings if the goal is to gain market leadership over the hardware cycle.

Relative to competitors Sony and Nintendo, Microsoft is in much better shape to acquire promising development studios. The company has recently reaffirmed its commitment to Xbox and gaming, and growing its business on these fronts could be dependent on making the right acquisitions. At present, purchasing game companies or exclusive rights to high-profile software looks to be one of Microsoft's best options for combating Sony's mind and market share advantages.

With Microsoft now emphasizing a games-first strategy, flexing its financial muscle to secure top-notch content would help Xbox One's value proposition. Purchasing a company like Japanese publisher Capcom could give Microsoft access to some of the most celebrated series in gaming, as well as resources for making an inlet into Japan's highly lucrative mobile market. Recent comments from Microsoft indicate that the Xbox brand might play an increasingly large role in the company's mobile efforts, and Capcom's properties and mobile infrastructure could prove helpful. Microsoft might also want to look at German games company CryTek, which is currently in the midst of some financial trouble and may be looking for outside help. Of course, these two companies represent just a small fraction of those that Microsoft may be interested in, but some games-related acquisitions remain a likely move.

What does the Kinect-less Xbox One mean for Microsoft?
The introduction of the $399 Xbox One can be viewed as one of Microsoft's first steps in a broader comeback strategy. The system's June sales show that there's solid interest in the platform, but also that more will have to be done if it is to match or outperform PlayStation 4. Sales remain relatively close in North America, but Sony's platform continues to build a commanding lead in other territories. Now that Microsoft has introduced a more gaming-focused version of its platform to market, attention turns to how it will convince consumers that Xbox One offers the best software. Acquiring developers and exclusive content stands a likely answer to that question.

Leaked: Apple's next smart device (warning, it may shock you)
Apple recently recruited a secret-development "dream team" to guarantee its newest smart device was kept hidden from the public for as long as possible. But the secret is out, and some early viewers are claiming its everyday impact could trump the iPod, iPhone, and the iPad. In fact, ABI Research predicts 485 million of this type of device will be sold per year. But one small company makes Apple's gadget possible. And its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early in-the-know investors. To be one of them, and see Apple's newest smart gizmo, just click here!

Keith Noonan has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of Microsoft. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information