The Truth Behind Comcast's $1.50 Retransmission Fee

The cable giant tacks on an extra $1.50 each month for many of its customers.

Jul 25, 2014 at 10:03AM

Comcast (NASDAQ:CMCSA) proudly lists the prices of its various cable packages in its commercials, on its website, in its mailed solicitations, and in its print ads. But for many Comcast customers, that's not what they actually pay. In addition to applicable taxes, many customers also get hit with a $1.50 broadcast TV fee each month.

These aren't surprise charges the company was unaware of when it created its website and ads. The broadcast TV fee is a way for Comcast to recoup the money it must pay to retransmit various channels -- an expense that's been rising in recent years.

Basically, increasing costs have made it impossible for Comcast to deliver the promised service at the advertised price while still making its desired margins. So, instead of changing the price or making the added fee clear, Comcast advertises one price and charges another.

The other major cable companies pass the cost on as well, but they add it into their overall price, according to Kevin Hunt, a business columnist at The Hartford Courant.

Even late-night TV ads for pajama jeans make it clear you pay extra for shipping and handling. But Comcast chooses to hide the full cost in its disclaimer text.

What exactly is happening here?

Over the last few years the major broadcast networks -- CBS (NYSE: CBS), ABC, NBC, and Fox (NASDAQ: FOX) -- have fought over retransmission fees, money paid by the cable company for the right to show a channel to its subscribers. The networks have huge leverage to keep pushing these fees higher because customers get very unhappy when negotiations stall and a cable provider removes a channel. This can cause subscribers to leave for another provider (likely DirecTV (NASDAQ: DTV) or Dish Networks (NASDAQ: DISH)).

Geekwire printed a statement from Comcast spokesman Steve Kipp explaining the issue, sort of. 

Beginning in 2014, we will itemize a portion of broadcast retransmission costs as a separate line item to be more transparent with our customers about the factors that drive price changes.... In 2014, we will not increase the price of Limited Basic or Digital Preferred video service, and adjustments to other video service prices will be lower than they would have been without the Broadcast TV Fee.

That makes sense for existing customers who had the fee added to their bills. It does not explain why the company keeps advertising prices without including or mentioning the added fee.

The company does explain the fee -- and the prospect of additional ones -- under a small "details and restrictions" link posted near the advertised price. That might make adding the charge legal, but hiding extra costs in a disclaimer will do little to endear Comcast to its customers. 

Why is Comcast doing this?

In short, advertising 12 months of service for $49.99 is sexier than advertising it for $51.49. 

For its existing customers Comcast itemizes the fee in order to avoid raising its base rates while still charging more. But by breaking it out separately, the company is also telling its customers, "Hey, we don't want to charge this but those mean networks keep asking us for more money."

That argument might fly a little better if Comcast did not also own NBC, which benefits from rising retransmission fees. 

What should Comcast do?

Comcast should either raise its prices across the board to cover the fee or drop it. Eliminating the extra charge seems unlikely as the company finished 2013 with 21,690,000 subscribers, according to Leichtman Research Group. Some of those users have low-end packages, which don't pay the fee, but if 75% of the company's subscribers pay an extra $1.50 a month, that's $24.4 million a month or $292 million a year. Even for Comcast that's not small change.

The basic agreement between cable companies and subscribers is that a customer pays for a set of channels and the provider delivers those channels. Charging a distinct extra fee for a cost related to providing exactly what customers have ordered is questionable behavior. It's like The Cheesecake Factory listing a piece of cheesecake for $5.99 then adding a $1.50 sugar surcharge when you get your bill.

The practice might be legal, but it's wrong. Comcast should stop intentionally misleading its current and potential customers. 

Your cable company is scared, but you can get rich
You know cable's going away. But do you know how to profit? There's $2.2 trillion out there to be had. Currently, cable grabs a big piece of it. That won't last. And when cable falters, three companies are poised to benefit. Click here for their names. Hint: They're not Netflix, Google, and Apple. 


Daniel Kline has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information