1 Thing Holding Smartwatch Sales Back

Despite numerous attempts, early smartphones lack this "got to have it" feature.

Aug 9, 2014 at 1:00PM

A killer app is a piece of software that's so attractive that consumers will buy the hardware necessary just to run it. In the early days of personal computing, Visicalc -- the first spreadsheet computer program -- made the Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) II computer attractive for buyers. Later, email was considered a killer app for Internet access.


The Moto 360 featuring Android Wear Source: Wikimedia Commons

A killer app doesn't have to be a specific piece of software. It can be the way a device is applied. For example, with smartphones, the killer application was having the mobile web everywhere you went. With tablets, it was consuming the media the Internet had to offer -- streaming movies, reading eBooks, perusing news articles -- in a much more attractive (physically and fiscally) package than a laptop.

Smartwatch manufacturers and developers have yet to find the killer application for these wrist computers. Google (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) has thrown its hat in the ring with Android Wear and Google Now. Apple is expected to unveil a smartwatch with its own suite of built-in applications. And several other manufacturers have made smartwatches that aren't much more than fitness bands with better specs.

Health-conscious technology
A lot of people are excited about the fitness-tracking potential of smartwatches. The Galaxy Gear 2, for example, has a heart rate monitor built in, and Apple announced HealthKit at its WWDC this summer.

A smartwatch should be able to let people leave their phones at home when they go out for a run or do some crazy Crossfit workout. Gym goers would likely prefer to have their phone safely in a locker out of the way of rogue dumbbells. But for the most part, fitness bands already solve this problem.

The Fitbit Flex can track all your activities already for less than $100. Source: Wikimedia Commons

There are a few nice additions in smartwatches compared to fitness bands, such as a heart rate monitor and display, but the idea that these features would appeal to a much wider crowd than less expensive fitness bands doesn't make sense to me. A killer app has widespread allure.

While a smartwatch should be able to replace a fitness band, offering a slight upgrade at a significantly higher price point won't draw consumers to the new category en masse.

Give me information now
Google unveiled Android Wear, its modified version of the mobile OS for wearables, in March. Google put the focus on its Google Now service, which provides you with pertinent information based on context -- time, place, etc. It's also able to quickly fetch data like sports scores, stock prices, and weather.

Google Now is great for the smartwatch form factor because it produces "cards" that are meant to be viewed at a glance. The problem is that using Android Wear usually requires you to have your phone nearby. Google Now is excellent on Android phones, and it's even pretty good on iPhones through the Google Search app. I'm not sold on the idea that people will pay $200 to $300 just for the convenience of leaving their phone in their pocket.

Apple might be working on something
Apple's long-awaited iWatch is expected to be part of this falls new product lineup. If any company has a killer app up its sleeve, it's Apple.

After speaking with Tim Cook, UBS analyst Steve Milunovich says that he expects Apple's killer app to be voice messaging. Although slightly different from Android Wear's voice controlled text messaging, voice messaging is not unique. WhatsApp just added voice messaging as part of its Android Wear update.

Itime Patent

Apple recently filed a patent for a smartwatch called iTime. Source: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

Moreover, voice messaging likely has limited appeal. Nobody wants to be that weirdo that's telling his watch to send a message for him. The best use is for people driving or riding a bike, who can't easily use their phone. Why voice messaging is better than placing calls or text messaging is beyond me.

Still, Milunovich has high expectations for the iWatch. He thinks Apple can ship 21 million units in fiscal 2015, which at an ASP of $300 would translate into $6.3 billion in revenue. That would barely move the needle at Apple, which generated $171 billion in revenue during fiscal 2013. Those expecting the iWatch to be a game changer for Apple may want to rethink.

The world awaits
It usually takes some time before software developers catch up with the hardware available. While Apple's closed system puts in the best position to have a killer app at launch, we haven't heard anything that makes me believe that it has that piece of the puzzle yet. As a shareholder, I'd love to be proven wrong.

Meanwhile, smartwatch sales have underwhelmed thus far, with just 500,000 units sold in the U.S. between October and the beginning of June, according to NPD. Until there's a killer app, sales are unlikely to pick up speed. If developers take too long, the smartwatch may suffer the same fate as the netbook.

Leaked: Apple's next smart device (warning, it may shock you)
Apple recently recruited a secret-development "dream team" to guarantee its newest smart device was kept hidden from the public for as long as possible. But the secret is out, and some early viewers are claiming its everyday impact could trump the iPod, iPhone, and the iPad. In fact, ABI Research predicts 485 million of this type of device will be sold per year. But one small company makes Apple's gadget possible. And its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early in-the-know investors. To be one of them, and see Apple's newest smart gizmo, just click here!

Adam Levy owns shares of Apple. The Motley Fool recommends Apple, Google (A shares), and Google (C shares). The Motley Fool owns shares of Apple, Google (A shares), and Google (C shares). Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

A Financial Plan on an Index Card

Keeping it simple.

Aug 7, 2015 at 11:26AM

Two years ago, University of Chicago professor Harold Pollack wrote his entire financial plan on an index card.

It blew up. People loved the idea. Financial advice is often intentionally complicated. Obscurity lets advisors charge higher fees. But the most important parts are painfully simple. Here's how Pollack put it:

The card came out of chat I had regarding what I view as the financial industry's basic dilemma: The best investment advice fits on an index card. A commenter asked for the actual index card. Although I was originally speaking in metaphor, I grabbed a pen and one of my daughter's note cards, scribbled this out in maybe three minutes, snapped a picture with my iPhone, and the rest was history.

More advisors and investors caught onto the idea and started writing their own financial plans on a single index card.

I love the exercise, because it makes you think about what's important and forces you to be succinct.

So, here's my index-card financial plan:


Everything else is details. 

Something big just happened

I don't know about you, but I always pay attention when one of the best growth investors in the world gives me a stock tip. Motley Fool co-founder David Gardner (whose growth-stock newsletter was rated #1 in the world by The Wall Street Journal)* and his brother, Motley Fool CEO Tom Gardner, just revealed two brand new stock recommendations moments ago. Together, they've tripled the stock market's return over 12+ years. And while timing isn't everything, the history of Tom and David's stock picks shows that it pays to get in early on their ideas.

Click here to be among the first people to hear about David and Tom's newest stock recommendations.

*"Look Who's on Top Now" appeared in The Wall Street Journal which references Hulbert's rankings of the best performing stock picking newsletters over a 5-year period from 2008-2013.

Compare Brokers