Will the Clean Power Plan Kill the Coal Industry?

The EPA's newest energy plan could crush the coal industry -- but it's not set in stone, yet.

Aug 16, 2014 at 1:55PM


Source: Wikimedia Commons; wy.blm.gov 

The Obama Administration has it out for coal. The EPA's new Clean Power Plan is cutting coal's cost advantage to push power beyond dirty fossil fuels. But states and corporations are fighting back, and it's still unclear who will win this bureaucratic battle. Here's what you need to know.

Cutting out coal
On June 2, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced a "commonsense plan to cut carbon pollution from power plants." While other plans have beat around the climate change bush by imposing limits on arsenic or mercury emissions, this is the first time the EPA has directly targeted carbon, the primary greenhouse gas culprit behind climate change.

Rather than impose direct caps or limits on emissions, the EPA has developed an algorithm that allows each state to balance carbon emissions with their current power generation portfolio. The Brookings Institute visualized the new plan in a series of simple equations pitting emissions rates per MW against total current generation:

Brookings Equation

Source: Brookings Institute; "E" is emissions rate and "G" is current generation

Number crunching aside, the new policy pits clean energy against dirty energy like never before. The message is clear: Start cleaning up your act by 2020 or face federal wrath.

The good, the bad, and the ugly
The proposed plan has been both lauded and loathed. For environmentalists, the Clean Power Plan marks a major win. Power plants are the single largest greenhouse gas polluters, accounting for around one-third of our nation's total emissions.

Epa Poll

Source: EIA.gov 

If all goes as planned, "steady and responsible steps" (quoted from the EPA's press release) will put the U.S. in a significantly cleaner position by 2030:

  • Power sector carbon emissions cut by 30% from 2005 levels
  • A concurrent 25% cut in particle pollution, nitrogen oxides, and sulfur dioxide
  • An estimated $93 billion in climate and public health benefits via reduced premature deaths, child asthma attacks, and fewer missed work or school days
  • An approximately 8% drop in electricity bills due to increased energy efficiency and reduced overall electricity demand

Not a bad list -- but not everyone's elated. States and corporations are leveling lawsuits at the EPA, challenging the legal right and economic validity of such an unprecedented plan. Among the challengers are Alabama, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, South Carolina, West Virginia, and Wyoming, as well as Murray Energy, the U.S.'s largest privately held coal mining company.

West Virginia, the 38th poorest state in the U.S., has taken an especially hard line against the Clean Power Plan. Attorney General Patrick Morrisey issued a press release:

This lawsuit represents another effort by our office to invalidate the EPA's proposed rule that will have devastating effects on West Virginia's jobs and its economy. Our Office will use every legal tool available to protect coal miners and their families from the Obama Administration and its overreach.

The announcement came a day after Alpha Natural Resources announced 1,100 potential layoffs and reduced production at 11 West Virginia coal mines.

Other states and corporations are worried that their own new standards will force similar cutbacks. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the coal industry directly employs 80,030 Americans with an average hourly wage of $26.15. The West Virginia Coal Association estimates that in their state alone, coal creates 20,000 direct jobs, 70,000 indirect jobs, and over $6 billion of economic growth.

Coal ain't cut yet
The EPA's new policy is well-intended. With the right push, our nation's energy portfolio can clean up its act. But critics suggest that the plan asks for too much, too fast. But with unclear legal precedent, contentious benchmarks, and corporate backlash, the plan isn't set in stone, yet.

Do you know this energy tax "loophole"?
You already know record oil and natural gas production is changing the lives of millions of Americans. But what you probably haven't heard is that the IRS is encouraging investors to support our growing energy renaissance, offering you a tax loophole to invest in some of America's greatest energy companies. Take advantage of this profitable opportunity by grabbing your brand-new special report, "The IRS Is Daring You to Make This Investment Now!," and you'll learn about the simple strategy to take advantage of a little-known IRS rule. Don't miss out on advice that could help you cut taxes for decades to come. Click here to learn more.

Justin Loiseau has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information