5 Companies Al Gore Thinks Are Doomed

Former Vice President Al Gore. Photo credit: Flickr user simone.brunozzi

Former Vice President Al Gore thinks energy investors stand to lose $7 trillion when the carbon assets that are littering the balance sheets of multinational energy companies become worthless. He gets this number from a report by the Carbon Tracker Initiative, which suggests that the balance sheets of fossil fuel companies are littered with "unburnable" carbon.

This unburnable carbon is the oil, gas, and coal that is still in the earth that, if extracted and burned, would push the globe over the edge in terms of climate change. Because this is an edge we can't cross, it would suggest that the companies owning the assets are all but doomed.

The warning
This is why the former Vice President has continued to push against fossil fuels, and recently launched a new climate change awareness campaign as part of The Climate Reality Project. The new campaign, which is called "Why? Why Not?" is targeting youth and encouraging them to step forward as advocates for the climate change movement. The goal is to let their voices be heard at the U.N. Climate Summit later this year. It's all part of his campaign to warn the world that we can't keep burning carbon.

Gore, however, isn't just warning the world of the dangers of climate change. He's warning investors of the ominous future of their energy holdings. In an interview last year he noted that the carbon assets sitting on the balance sheets of multinational energy companies will one day go up in smoke, saying:

The valuation of companies and their assets is now based on the assumption that all of those carbon assets will be sold and burned. They are not going to be burned. They cannot be burned and will not be burned. No more than one-third can ever possibly be burned without destroying the future.

In essence, the former Vice President is suggesting that as much as two-thirds of the value of companies like ExxonMobil Corporation (NYSE: XOM  ) , Royal Dutch Shell plc (NYSE: RDS-A  ) (NYSE: RDS-B  ) , ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP  ) , Total SA (NYSE: TOT  ) and BP pcl (NYSE: BP  ) are based on these soon-to-be worthless carbon assets. The suggestion implies that these companies and those investing in them are in big trouble.

A look at Gore's biggest losers
The reason these companies in particular are doomed is because all five have exposure to the Canadian oil sands as well as deepwater oil projects. The oil sands is an area that the Carbon Tracker Initiative has called special attention to. A recent study it conducted suggested that these investments are a big waste of investors' capital, as the study suggested that oil needed to be north of $150 per barrel in order for the projects to be profitable.

That study specifically noted that ConocoPhillips in particular was vulnerable because it's an investor in two of the most expensive projects on the list. The independent oil and gas giant owns 50% of Foster Creek, which the Carbon Tracker study suggests needs oil above $159 per barrel in order to make money. Further, ConocoPhillips owns half of Surmont, with Total owning the other half, which needs oil above $156 to make money. Not only that, but ConocoPhillips also drills for oil in the deepwater off the coast of Africa, which needs oil prices north of $115 to make money according to the Carbon Tracker Initiative's study.

Surmont. Source: ConocoPhillips.

Royal Dutch Shell is another company with a doomed oil sands project, according to the Carbon Tracker Initiative. Its Carmon Creek project needs oil prices to hit $157 per barrel in order to be profitable. On top of that, Royal Dutch Shell is seeking to drill for oil in the Arctic, which has already wasted $5 billion of investors' capital and would waste more money if drilling restarted.

Likewise, ExxonMobil has pricey oil sands projects that will likely hurt the company according to the Carbon Tracker Initiative. ExxonMobil has invested in the Aspen and Kearl projects, which need oil prices of $147 and $134, respectively, to make money. Meanwhile, it, along with BP, has loads of deepwater projects in Africa and Brazil, which according to the Carbon Tracker Initiative's study, needs oil prices over $127 to be profitable.

Floating Production, Storage and Offloading vessel offshore Angola. Source: BP

What's an investor to do?
The issue here is who to believe. Gore and the Carbon Tracker Initiative have an agenda: They want to get the world off of carbon. Among the tactics used are warnings to investors that their investments could one day be worthless if the carbon assets that form the basis of those investments stay in the earth.

However, each one of the five "doomed" companies would say otherwise. ConocoPhillips, for example, expects to pull a billion dollars in cash flow per year out of its oil sands assets starting in 2017 when the second phase of Surmont is complete. That cash flow is expected to continue at that level for the next two decades. Likewise, each of the other supposedly doomed companies is solidly profitable today and expects to continue to be profitable in the future thanks to these investments. So, unless an investor really thinks that the carbon assets backing their investments won't be burned, then it's safe to say these companies might not be in as much trouble as Al Gore would hope. 

An energy tax "loophole"?
You already know record oil and natural gas production is changing the lives of millions of Americans. But what you probably haven't heard is that the IRS is encouraging investors to support our growing energy renaissance, offering you a tax loophole to invest in some of America's greatest energy companies. Take advantage of this profitable opportunity by grabbing your brand-new special report, "The IRS Is Daring You to Make This Investment Now!," and you'll learn about the simple strategy to take advantage of a little-known IRS rule. Don't miss out on advice that could help you cut taxes for decades to come. Click here to learn more.

Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (4)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On August 25, 2014, at 9:35 AM, oldokie1 wrote:

    Hope he makes his millions from Al Jazzire.

    In 1988 I wanted to vote Demo so a Southern Demo was a high candidate---until I heard him talk about the same subject to two different audiences. He said 100% opposites for votes.

    I know he will hop in his jet to his mansion and talk about carbon credits which he would like to sell

    The Greek word for hypocrite means actor.

  • Report this Comment On August 26, 2014, at 7:43 AM, WinstonsBack wrote:

    This article confuses two very different things. The fact that many oil and gas companies are destroying shareholder value today by deploying capital (their shareholders money) into high cost, high risk projects that will require an extremely high break even oil price to avoid losing money let alone make a profit. This is one of the main reasons that the financial performance of many oil and gas companies has been so bad in the last 3 to 5 years. The second issue is the possibility that demand for oil will be depressed in future due to a response to climate change in an attempt to stay within the carbon budget. In fact the demand analysis for oil carried out by The Carbon Tracker Initiative found that there are a whole range of factors which could suppress demand for oil and the oil price. Only one of which was climate policy. Before discounting this I would suggest that you read this 50 page plus analysis (Oil Demand: Comparing projections and Examing Risks) carried out by some of the most experienced analysts in the energy sector from financial institutions such as HSBC, Citi Group, Deutsche Bank etc. Find it at

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 3078430, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/30/2015 12:16:03 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Matt DiLallo

Matthew is a Senior Energy and Materials Specialist with The Motley Fool. He graduated from the Liberty University with a degree in Biblical Studies and a Masters of Business Administration. You can follow him on Twitter for the latest news and analysis of the energy and materials industries:

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 16,643.01 -11.76 -0.07%
S&P 500 1,988.87 1.21 0.06%
NASD 4,828.33 15.62 0.32%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

8/28/2015 4:04 PM
BP $33.26 Up +0.23 +0.70%
BP p.l.c. (ADR) CAPS Rating: ****
COP $46.82 Up +0.95 +2.07%
ConocoPhillips CAPS Rating: *****
RDS-A $52.60 Up +0.66 +1.27%
Royal Dutch Shell… CAPS Rating: ****
RDS-B $52.62 Up +0.66 +1.27%
Royal Dutch Shell CAPS Rating: ****
TOT $46.09 Up +0.82 +1.81%
Total (ADR) CAPS Rating: *****
XOM $75.07 Up +0.22 +0.29%
ExxonMobil Corp CAPS Rating: ****