Can Microsoft’s Windows 9 Succeed Where Windows 8 Failed?

In his short time as CEO of Microsoft  (NASDAQ: MSFT  ) Satya Nadella has shown little desire to stick with things that aren't working. He made massive cuts to the company's workforce, unbundled the Kinect motion sensor from Xbox, and closed down the division making original television-style programs for the game console. Now he's moving on from one of the company's biggest failures by pushing up the release of WIndows 9 instead of continuing to patch up the little-liked WIndows 8.

Though the company has not confirmed the information, The Verge reported Thursday that sources familiar with Microsoft's plans say Microsoft has tentatively planned a press event for Sept. 30 to introduce the new Windows, which has a codename of "Threshold." This news follows a similar report earlier in the month from ZDNet, which had pegged the announcement as coming in late September or early October.

Whatever the exact timing is, it appears the days of WIndows 8 are numbered. 

Why was Windows 8 not popular?
Fans of Windows 8, of which I am one, would say that it's an idea that's ahead of its time. The OS dropped the traditional Start screen and menu in favor of an icon-based interface similar to the one used on an Apple  (NASDAQ: AAPL  ) iPad. It was still possible to get to a version of the traditional desktop but it lacked the Start menu, which was the path to opening programs on previous version of Windows.

The biggest challenge for Windows 8 is that it's optimized to work on touchscreen computers but many of the desktops and laptops sold with the OS lacked that capability. Using the icon-based interface without touch is not particularly intuitive and has a bit of a learning curve.

When customers upgraded Windows previously, say from Windows XP to Vista or Windows 7, new features were added but the core interface was basically the same. Windows 8 was designed for a touch-based world, which is likely the direction computers are going in, but that world has not arrived yet. 

How bad is Windows 8 doing?
Windows 8, which includes the original launch version and the Windows 8.1 update, is being used as the operating system on 12.48% of all desktop and laptop computers as of July, according to NetMarketShare. That's well less than immediate predecessor Windows 7, which has a 51.22% share, and the defunct Windows XP at 24.82%. The XP number is particularly disturbing as Microsoft stopped supporting the OS in April and made a push for customers using it to upgrade to Windows 8.  

The company posted the following text, along with a countdown clock on its website in advance of the day support ended.  

There will be no more security updates or technical support for the Windows XP operating system. It is very important that customers and partners migrate to a modern operating system such as Windows 8.1. Customers moving to a modern operating system will benefit from dramatically enhanced security, broad device choice for a mobile workforce, higher user productivity, and a lower total cost of ownership through improved management capabilities.

Windows 8 has not sold well despite Microsoft pushing it very aggressively. Though there are some neat features offered in the icon-base interface, including "live" tiles which update things like sports scores, stock prices, and news headlines, the OS largely alienated desktop users.

Despite the failure to get people to adopt Windows 8, revenue for the Windows division has stayed remarkably similar for the last three fiscal years. The business segment had $18.8 billion in revenue in 2011, $18.84 in 2012, and $18.68 in 2013 though operating profit dropped for the division in 2013 to $8.9 billion from just over $12 billion in each of the two previous years. 

Why Windows 9?
Before Nadella took over, Microsoft seemed committed to offering updates to Windows 8 that restore features users wanted. As recently as April ZDNet was reporting that its sources inside Microsoft were saying the company would be releasing an update that would put the traditional Start menu back. In a post on the Windows blog in April Microsoft acknowledged that it needed to update the OS faster and more often.

As we've said before, Windows 8.1 Update along with the new Server and Embedded updates reflects Microsoft's commitment to providing a more rapid cadence of feature improvements for our customers. More than ever, these updates are driven by customer feedback and the need to refine and innovate to meet their growing needs.

If the company is listening to user feedback than the number one thing it needs to do is restore the Start menu. Doing that in Windows 8 may have worked, but doing it under a new product name -- presumably Windows 9 -- may resonate better with customers. The Windows 8 name has a taint with users that may be hard to overcome. Launching a new OS under a new brand name while highlighting that you listened to what people were saying has been a successful strategy for other companies.

The most famous example would be when Coca Cola (NYSE: KO  ) angered its user base in 1985 by launching New Coke to replace its classic formula. That move was met with consumer outrage and the company ultimately brought back "Classic Coke" less than three months later, propelling the brand to new heights.

Microsoft has a history of launching a Windows version people don't like (Windows Vista) and rebounding with one they do (WIndows 7). WIndows 8 may be a failed experiment but the company can recover from it if it makes the launch of WIndows 9 about giving the people what they want.  

Leaked: Apple's next smart device (warning, it may shock you)
Apple recently recruited a secret-development "dream team" to guarantee its newest smart device was kept hidden from the public for as long as possible. But the secret is out, and some early viewers are claiming its everyday impact could trump the iPod, iPhone, and the iPad. In fact, ABI Research predicts 485 million of this type of device will be sold per year. But one small company makes Apple's gadget possible. And its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early-in-the-know investors. To be one of them, and see Apple's newest smart gizmo, just click here!


Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On August 24, 2014, at 12:40 AM, AsokAsus wrote:

    Windows 9 will be successful ONLY if it is BETTER than Windows 7 in facilitating the daily work that PC users perform worldwide; successful, ONLY if Windows 9 is the operating system people need and want, and NOT the operating system Microsoft needs and wants.

    Despite any actions Microsoft might take, Windows 7 won't "end" until they make something better. Period. After all, the world still needs to carry on with its vast and varied IT work regardless of the latest flimsy, self-serving product that Microsoft might wish to cram down their throats.

    And Windows 9 better be better than Windows 7 or Microsoft is in serious trouble.

    Unfortunately, given the steady stream of disasters coming out of Redmond lately, something tells me that the hurriedly rushed Windows 9 may not save Microsoft because it's not likely to be better than Windows 7. After all, how many business people has anyone heard lately begging to have Cortina, integrated Bing, integrated Microsoft Store, Metro UI integrated into the Start Menu, or Integrated Microsoft Could? I'm thinking pretty much exactly zero.

    I don't think Microsoft has truly learned its lesson yet, since it seems that they're simply going to careen from their massive UI disaster to new, but different disasters of their own making, including attempts to tightly integrate Microsoft store, cloud and other MICROSOFT services into Windows 9.

    And you can also be assured that both consumers and the enterprise will be looking with a severely jaded eye upon the worthiness of Windows 9, particularly since Microsoft hasn't given anyone enough time to spit the terrible taste of Windows 8 out of their mouths before the hurried introduction of Windows 9.

    The bottom line is that Microsoft is facing a headwind of skepticism (and alternatives) like never before in their history of introducing new operating systems, and I wonder if they know that Windows 9 is not just the next OS to be introduced to a naive and adoring audience with their typically lame publicity barrage, but may be in fact be the last OS they ever introduce that anyone will actually give a hoot about.

  • Report this Comment On August 24, 2014, at 9:13 AM, SkipPlummer947 wrote:

    The easy answer to the question at hand is "no".

  • Report this Comment On August 24, 2014, at 9:32 AM, SkipPlummer947 wrote:

    You are right, Asok. My three desktops are running Windows 7 Ultimate (through 2020) but the latest one arrived with Windows 8/8.1 pre-installed.

    I messed around with it for a few weeks, deflated it to the point where it would emulate Windows 7 Ultimate, thought about it for awhile and decided that the whole situation was silly and too much work.

    I threw away anything to do with Windows 8 and did a fresh install of Windows 7 Ultimate.

    I am presently dual-booting one Linux OS after another on these machines (I think that Zorin 9 Ultimate will turn out to be my favorite) and I seem to have until 2020 to decide which of them will be my replacement for Microsoft.

    The Zorin 9 Ultimate installation media wasn't free but it was completely reasonable. Updates for OS's like that are free and when new releases come down the line, they slide right on in without disturbing your present setup.

    Of course maybe by 2020 MS will be finished with silly season and have something available that will meet my needs. Time will tell but I'm really not worried about it any longer.

    I've been piddling around with this stuff since before Windows (DOS 5.0) and have lived through the good and the bad. This latest debacle with MS (force feeding) has really put me off with them.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 3079996, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/21/2014 4:21:02 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement